[go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Ithobaal I

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2A02:A472:E0B0:0:2022:427A:CC3B:56FC in topic Current sources not a solid base

Current sources not a solid base

edit

The story of Jezebel from 1 Kings and Contra Apion? Only good enough for 19th-century essays and today's biblical fundamentalists. The Bible doesn't deal with him directly, and Josephus only quotes another author who lived 7 centuries after the character we're talking about. It should be made clearer that the article isn't science. Arminden (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quite the contrary, the biblical source and Josephus' record may be shown to be correct:
https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2021/december/biblical-archaeology-top-10-discoveries-new-artifacts-2021.html
https://historycollection.com/20-pieces-of-evidence-that-support-events-in-the-bible/12/#cis_scroll_here
https://nypost.com/2018/06/09/3000-year-old-sculpture-of-mystery-biblical-king-found-in-israel/
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1328382/Archaeology-news-Bible-discovery-Queen-Jezebel-seal-Israel
Maybe you should consider what they have to say instead of being so dismissive of "19th-century essays and today's biblical fundamentalists"; one of them is even labeled as "science". Has the thought ever occurred to your brain that maybe, just maybe, they could be right? 69.113.233.201 (talk) 18:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
You are a sad suburban white supremacist who hides behind an IP adress. I can do it too, except that I know who you are and I know where you live. Stop trolling and stop harassing signed up users on their personal pages you pathetic sad excuse of a person. Watch your mouth. 2A02:A472:E0B0:0:2022:427A:CC3B:56FC (talk) 23:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply