Talk:Facet joint

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Chiropractic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apophyseal

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The above word re-directs here, though there is no mention of whether it is an alternative word with the same meaning, or an antonym or anything else. I'm off to Google now, as I certainly can't help here yet :) Gondooley (talk) 12:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

It relates to the more general word apophysis, so I'm re-directing there instead.Gondooley (talk) 12:53, 21 October 2010 (UTC

Chiropractic

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Chiropractic is a controversial treatment. Valid citations showing that it is thought by a majority of medical doctors to be a conservative treatment option need to be provided before it is mentioned as such in the article. Pending this I have removed the mention of chiropractic from the article. Gb drbob (talk) 17:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 04 October 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. The consensus is the proposed title is the common name. Jenks24 (talk) 09:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Zygapophysial joint → Facet joint – Far more widely referred to and would match Facet joint syndrome and Facet joint injection pages – Iztwoz (talk) 18:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Iztwoz:: "Zygapophysial" seems to be the correct full name. The forms "Z-joints" and "facet joints" look like abbreviatory operating-room jargon whose use has spread. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is also the TA name but usage shows far more refs to facet joint on both N-grams and Google search. ? Being such an easier name to use can only see its usage increasing further. --Iztwoz (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Support per your rationale. A much easier name for lay readers to understand. We can include the other names in the title. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic