Talk:FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007

FIS names its ski championships in the following format: FIS (discipline) World Ski Championships (year). I think Wikipedia should respect the official names, so this article's name should be FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007.--Nitsansh 22:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The problem with that is most people look at items as year first, then the championship name for clarity reasons. You don't see Winter Olympics of 2006 or World Series of 1993 as examples becasue they are called the 2006 Winter Olympics or 1993 World Series as examples. I disagree with that. Chris 13:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Different governing bodies have different name policies. In the case of the Olympics, the official name never include the year nor the term "summer", but instead the serial number. --Nitsansh 19:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Design 1:

Design 2:

Medal	Name	Nation	Time	Behind

Design 3:

Medal	Athlete	Time
align="center"|
align="center"|
align="center"|

I will stay with design #1. This is the standard used for the Winter Olympics and I prefer we stay with this format. Chris 14:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Now User:Brandenburg has changed some positions of the "nationality", and in my opinion it doesn't look better. I agre, stick with #1. --Pudeo (Talk) 12:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The compromise that is shown actually looks good and more organized. Now we will see how this comes out when the nordic combined team event happens tomorrow. Chris 17:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

On times: I think the best idea would be to do mass finishes as "+0.1, +0.2" etc., while time trials (of which there is only two...*groan*) should have the time actually achieved. Just a thought, I think this would better convey the nature of each event. Sam Vimes | Address me 22:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

• I have seem times similar to that in Formula One races as mentioned by Sam, but I have seen the times listed in athletics event where all of the times are recorded. For historical consistency, I think it would be best to keep the times as is on all events since they are shown that way on books I have seen of the Olympics. Chris 00:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I suggest we list the events in the order they occur(red); as of this writing, the order is non-chronological. Any comments? --Wernher 22:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

In most books I have seen on events like this, they are generally done shortest individual distance to longest team distance. To maintain consistency, I recommend it stays in non-chronological order. Chris 23:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211210239/http://fis-ski.com:80/uk/disciplines/skijumping/cupstandings.html to http://www.fis-ski.com/uk/disciplines/skijumping/cupstandings.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070324051432/http://www.sapporo2007.com/english/index.html to http://www.sapporo2007.com/english/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927202856/http://www.szon.de/news/sport/wintersport/200703040141.html to http://www.szon.de/news/sport/wintersport/200703040141.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on FIS Nordic World Ski Championships 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930133021/http://www.fis-ski.com/uk/newsinformation/pressreleases/press-releases-2007/doping-panel-may-sanctio.html to http://www.fis-ski.com/uk/newsinformation/pressreleases/press-releases-2007/doping-panel-may-sanctio.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312072606/http://www.fis-ski.com/uk/disciplines.html?actu_id_448=12&actu_page_448=1 to http://www.fis-ski.com/uk/disciplines.html?actu_id_448=12&actu_page_448=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070228215003/http://www.fis-ski.com/uk/604/1228.html?cal_suchsector=CC&event_id=22246 to http://www.fis-ski.com/uk/604/1228.html?cal_suchsector=CC&event_id=22246

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply