This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
How is it that the "neutrality is disputed" when my comment is apparently the first one on this talk page? Stan 17:26, 27 Dec 2003 (UTC)
this should be an undisputed article
editI'm new here, but interested in the disputation cycle in wikipedia. I agree with the parent: there's been one post, and that was over a year and a half ago and it noted that no one posted a disputation. My post simply points that out and recommends the article be undisputed. Anyone who would have disputed it has had plenty of time to state their case, and obviously hasn't.
HW
this is an undisputed article now
editthat's the nature of wiki... just do it. ;-)