This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). U.S. Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) person(s). United States: Texas / State Legislatures Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force. Nursing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nursing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nursing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NursingWikipedia:WikiProject NursingTemplate:WikiProject NursingNursing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. African diaspora Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: "Scandal removed from Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson's Wikipedia page". Dallas Morning News. 2013-05-14. Archived from the original on 2013-05-15. Retrieved 2013-05-15.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Alexandria Baca (2013-05-15). "Scholarship scandal restored to Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson's Wikipedia entry". Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on 2013-05-15. Retrieved 2013-05-15.

THe map appears to be from a US Federal Government source. That usually means that it is in the pubic domaiin (although the trademarks may not be). You should double check this, but if it is, you should upload it,or a modified versioin of it, to WIkipedia, as internal content is always preferable to external links. --David Woolley 10:16, 19 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I removed the "Controversy" section per WP:BLP. There were no sources cited at all. First, to have a section named "Controversy", you need reliable sources characterizing something as controversial. We can't just say something is a controversy. There has to be notable opinion that it is controversial. The comment she made also needs to be reliably sourced, as well as the claims about her critics. So that's probably three (maybe only two) reliable sources that are required before that section can go back in. Crockspot 01:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I was alerted to an article about suspected improper edits of this page. Attempted a rough paste of the section that had been removed by looking at last revision before user boysinclair's revision chain. Someone please confirm I didn't miss anything and make it prettier if necessary. Also, if a higher power could lock the page against edits for a bit, or just stick on his/her/its watch list, that would be nice, too. BTW, section included cites and was about a 2010 scandal, so is *not* in conflict with Crockspot's notice above, dating to 2007. --Markzero (talk) 05:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The page is now on my watch list. I'll lock the page if it becomes necessary to protect the article's integrity, but not until I see evidence that this has become an ongoing problem. Rklawton (talk) 14:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

NOTE: I just tried to get some information on this and found all supporting links in the three footnotes in the section to be dead ends. Whether the Dallas newspaper changed their retrieval system or not, I don't know. Perhaps someone could check with them and correct the links. The only information I could seem to come up with is the interview at this link, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6s4qpmjJUE, which does have some facts. D.A.Timm (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

In a tangentially related note: I started HOURS AGO to edit the following section to give it references as well as a more WP:NPOV tone, but I had to get back to work before I could get anywhere looking for material. Could someone else please start tackling the campaign-flyer tone of the final sentences of the following paragraph? There may well be newspaper items or other legit references to demonstrate that Johnson's 2012 campaign was described by outsiders as particularly successful, but at present there are no such references in crucial sentences of this text:

===Elections===

In 1992, she decided to retire from the Texas Senate to run for the newly created Texas' 30th congressional district. She defeated Republican nominee Lucy Cain 72%-25%.^[1] In 1994, she defeated Lucy Cain again 73%-26%.^[2] In 1996, she won re-election to a third term with just 55% of the vote, the worst election performance of her congressional career.^[3] After that, she never won re-election with less than 72% of the vote. In May, 2012 Johnson faced two opponents in the Democratic Primary, and it was thought that they would present her first serious challenge since being elected. Johnson won a landslide victory crushing both opponents, one heavily funded and the other with good name recognition. In the end they were no match for Johnson's record of achievement and popularity with voters.

Will do what I can to assist when it is neither 3:26am with me still online longer after I should be asleep, nor 3:26pm when I have an actual, ya know, paid job to do. :) Lawikitejana (talk) 08:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hadn't seen this discussion, but I made some changes that I think addresses the "campaign flyer tone" you are referring to. Also fixed some lovely vandalism. Drwhapcaplet (talk) 13:58, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

We had a blanking incident again today - this one stemming from the Washington D.C. area. I've restored the affected section. Keep in mind that this could be whitewashing - or it could be someone trying to make the subject look guilty of whitewashing. We could investigate further, but in the overall scheme of things, this is both trivial and easy to fix. Rklawton (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Don't kid yourself, it was obviously one of Johnson's minions from her congressional office. They're doing all they can to keep this crime out of the news, and they're going to delete it from wikipedia over and over again. The page probably should be locked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.69.3.2 (talk) 15:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

In the world of dirty political tricks, it could just as easily be someone on the other side trying to make it look that way. Rklawton (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

(from fox news) It also opens the door for corporate donations and contributions from foreign governments to maintain the proposed park.

All i have to ask is (1) which political insider get's this unwatchable grant money and (2) if the Chinese caputure our flag on the moon if asking them nicely will get it back!

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eddie Bernice Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130504090910/http://ebjohnson.house.gov:80/ebj-bio/ to http://ebjohnson.house.gov/ebj-bio/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141024140107/https://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/mar04_169_state.htm?x=0&y=218&id=176 to https://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/mar04_169_state.htm?x=0&y=218&id=176

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply