This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Yes, I agree to make this an article on the concept in general instead of on one set of standards or another. That is why I am proposing a merge, although it may take a while since may of the other articles are not sourced very well. W Nowicki (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Is that the merger of the articles about particular EFM PHY layers into this article? If so, then if this article is about the concept in general, not about particular standards, wouldn't that suggest that the particular PHYs have their own pages (as at least some other PHYs do), especially given that the various EFM PHYs are somewhat different (copper and different flavors of glass)? Guy Harris (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree that any particular PHY could have its own page. But I am of the opinion that if there is not much to say about some particular topic, even though it otherwise qualifies for a page of its own, then we might as well merge the few words about that specific topic into a more general article.
