[go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Chess opening

Latest comment: 1 day ago by 84.118.224.20 in topic Article requires chess knowledge

History?

edit

just a suggestion: maybe there could be history of openings section. Some openings must be newer than others. And the popularity of openings must have changed over time. Something along these lines may be interesting to read. I'm just starting to sketch out some things in the shogi world (Shogi_opening#History_of_opening_research) and didnt see anything similar here. – ishwar  (speak) 00:22, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nice way to summarize openings

edit
4 a4 b4 c4 d4 e4 f4 g4 h4
3 a3 or Na3 b3 c3 or Nc3 d3 e3 f3 or Nf3 g3 h3 or Nh3
  a b c d e f g h

This is how I liked to see the opening information presented. By hovering over the links, you can also quiz yourself about the move names. Jason Quinn (talk) 16:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

In practice the sensible flank openings often transpose; 1.g3 has little identity of its own for example. Double sharp (talk) 15:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Changing pronouns in openings

edit

It seems to me that the vast majority of the openings here often refer to the player with he/his pronouns instead of they/their suggested by MOS:GNL. Toron4 (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I took a crack at this Popsofctown (talk) 05:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

first move graph

edit

Hi. I made a bar graph of the 1st move percentage for the wikibook, so I mention it here in case you are interested. File:Chess firstMove.png However, I did include a non-master database into the average, which (if you are like most chess books) may displease you. Anyway, yall can use it or not. – ishwar  (speak) 17:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Article requires chess knowledge

edit

For me as a non-chess player, the meaning of the characters in the move sequence is unclear. Probably add some non-specialist explaination or at least a reference so people like me could follow this. 84.118.224.20 (talk) 09:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply