Talk:Charlie Clements

If there is a reliable source out there that this actor will be the new Doctor then please show this reliable source. Until then please do not add it to the article. Deckchair (talk) 14:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, people keep reverting the fact that Charlie hates being famous, hates being recognised and "wants his life back" (his own words).

Why should this be reverted?

It's something he has genuinely stated himself, backed up by the reference provided but people keep reverting it without stating why it should be reverted. Like I've said it's something he said himself and the reference is proof of that so it can stay in his article. If you don't want this in his article then please state your reasons and discuss it here :) --5 albert square (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The reference doesn't say he hates being famous, so I'm about to change it to something else that is confirmed by the source. _{anemoneprojectors│talk} 00:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ah ok, sorry I could've sworn that it did. I remember that the first reference did definitely say that but unfortunately that URL is no longer in action --5 albert square (talk) 01:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. I don't remember seeing that he hated being famous, and that's silly anyway because he's staying in acting. It's just EastEnders that gets him too much attention. I bet it takes longer than a couple of months though. _{anemoneprojectors│talk} 01:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, look at Mohammed George, I think he left EastEnders 2 or 3 years ago and he's not had an acting job since! --5 albert square (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I looked already :P Imagine if he hadn't been sacked. Would he still be in EastEnders now? Erk! _{anemoneprojectors│talk} 01:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Er, no, he wouldn't be. No way, no and never. if Gus was such an important character once the tabloid stories were proven to be untrue, why didn't Santer invite Mohammed back then? Mind you I did like in the link that I posted to Digital Spy, how he tried to lay the blame firmly at EastEnders door for all of this! Er, is it EastEnders fault that the tabloids supposedly printed untruths? I don't think so --5 albert square (talk) 02:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

can someone add a picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericdeaththe2nd (talk • contribs) 19:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

As soon as someone takes a photo that they are willing to release under a Wikimedia-compatible licence, it shall be added. –anemoneprojectors– 19:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Does anyone have a picture ?????????? Ericdeaththe2nd (talk

Not a free one, I just searched. –anemoneprojectors– 23:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why not use on from a website? Ericdeaththe2nd (talk • contribs) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.247.111 (talk) 23:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Because we need free images, not unfree (copyrighted/"fair use") ones. It has to be released with an appropriate licence. Otherwise we would just put the screenshot of Bradley Branning on the page. But we can't, because it's not a free image. –anemoneprojectors– 00:59, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlie Clements. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071117020027/http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile to http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=101124907

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charlie Clements. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100224102220/http://www.tvthrong.co.uk/eastenders/charlie-clements-%E2%80%98i-just-want-my-life-back%E2%80%99 to http://www.tvthrong.co.uk/eastenders/charlie-clements-%E2%80%98i-just-want-my-life-back%E2%80%99
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120527113950/http://www.faith-london.co.uk/ to http://www.faith-london.co.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120527113950/http://www.faith-london.co.uk/ to http://www.faith-london.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply