Talk:Biddulph Grange

I removed the gallery and incorporated some of its images into the article because I thought that few of the images in the gallery improved the article.

• Image:Aa_biddulphgrange_dahliawalk.jpg - A picture of the Dahlia walk that doesn't have any Dahlias in it. File:Biddulph Grange view along Dahlia Walk.jpg which I've included in the body of the article gives a decent overview
• Image:Bieddulph Grange great wall of china.jpg - I put this image next to where it was mentioned in the text
• Image:Biddulph Grange China from top.jpg - possibly this one should be incorporated into the article but it doesn't look much like a willow pattern plate, if the intention of the image is to show this then I'm sure a better photo could be taken
• Image:Biddulph Grange the pinetum.jpg - I'm not sure what this adds to the article
• Image:Aa Biddulph Grange Egypt.jpg - I put this image next to where it was mentioned in the text
• Image:Aa Biddulph Grange Wellingtonia Walk.jpg - I'm not sure what this adds to the article
• Image:MVC-294F from great vase court.jpg - Not necessary for article
• Image:Aa Biddulph Grange lake.jpg - Hardly shows the lake, better picture of the lake in the infobox
• Image:Pm bg parterres.jpg - Poor picture, washed out at back, large bank taking up plenty of the foreground that isn't subject of image, I'm not sure what this adds to the article
• Image:Biddulph Grange back of house.jpg - Decent photo but there's already a photo of the front and side of the house
• Biddulph Grange - Poor photo, not necessary for article
• Image:Biddulph Grange view along Dahlia Walk.jpg - Included in body of article
• Image:Biddulph Grange view along Dahlia Walk from other end.jpg - No need for this photo and fairly washed out
• Image:Biddulph Grange flowers along Dahlia Walk.jpg - should be in Dahlia article if anywhere
• File:Aa rhododendron arborescens.jpg - should be in Rhododendron article if anywhere (which it is)

If a reader wants a gallery they only have to click on the Commons cat link and they get all these photos. JMiall₰ 14:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biddulph Grange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160808203044/http://www.staffsmoorlands.gov.uk/sm/park/biddulph-grange-country-park to http://www.staffsmoorlands.gov.uk/sm/park/biddulph-grange-country-park

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 18:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)Reply