[go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Bhima

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Seyamar in topic Rewritten

Reg Khatushyamji

edit

Removed "Khatushyamji" related info

  • 1 - Mahabharata has no mention of any "Khatushyamji" figure.
  • 2 - Seems like user's personal POV.

User needs to corroborate facts from Hindu literature viz Vedas/Sutras/Puranas etc.

Info about Khatushyamji

edit

It has been mentioned in Mahabharat about "Khatushyamji". In TV Serial "Mahabharat Katha" which is the modification of "Mahabharat" it has been mentioned. He had very important role in Mahabharat. Whoever has removed information about Khatushyamji, i think he does not have more knowledge about Mahabharat. Refer link: http://www.khatushyamji.com/legend.htm or Khatushyamji.

river bhima

edit

Soon we need to create a disambiguation page for river bhima which flows in maharashtra.

Bhima's parents

edit

Perhaps worth mentioning his parents as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.140.181.4 (talk) 02:06, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Issues

edit

This article has many issues:

  • Short paras that can be merged: violation of Wikipedia:LAYOUT#Paragraphs
  • "addresses the main aspects of the topic":
    • Suddenly "Along with other Pandava brothers, ... " after birth. Pandu's death and return to Hastinapur is missing.
    • Another gap: After lac-palace incident, Pandavas were presumed death. Even winning Draupadi in disguise. then their return to Hastinapur
    • Slaying of Hidimba
  • Neutrality: facts included in the article only glorify him, but other facts missed:
    • Killing Duryodhana by hitting on thigh against rules of combat
    • defeated by Karna in the war, where Bhima was struck unconscious but Karna spared his life owing his promise to Kunti
  • Prose:
    • Lists in "During the Kurukshetra War" need to be converted to prose.
    • "Thanks to Vidura, the Pandavas ... " Informal. Incorrect tone

IMO, the GA nomination should be withdrawn. Redtigerxyz Talk 05:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Azhagiya_manavalan

You still haven't updated the karna part Arjuna randi (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bhima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Killing Kauravas

edit

Bhima actually killed 99 Kauravas. Bhima didnt kill Yuyutsu. Yuyutsu fought on behalf of Pandavas. Karna DV (talk) 10:08, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

There were 102 Kaurava, not 100. 100 sons of Gandhari + Gandhari's daughter Dushala and Dhritrashtra's illegitimate son Yuyutsu.💠245CMR💠.👥📜 07:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Citations for alternative names?

edit

We need citations for the definitions of his alternate names. Jihnmayodhin is said here to mean "fighter against falsehoods," but most sources online say it actually means "unfair/unmoral fighter," (Jihnma = morally crooked; Yodhin = fighter, according to these sources), referring to when he broke the rules of combat. DaCashman (talk) 06:56, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

Much better sourcing is required for this article. As it is now, the article relies way too heavily on individual opinion and primary sourcing. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 01:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bhima s fights are inconsistent

edit

Bhima didn't win against karna on the16th day. Arjuna randi (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Missing days

edit

Other days of the war are missing Arjuna randi (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

added new references as well as a new section.

edit

https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01002.htm https://sanskritdocuments.org/mirrors/mahabharata/ https://sanskritdocuments.org/ https://sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07195.htm https://sanskritdocuments.org/mirrors/mahabharata/unic/mbh01_sa.html

I will add more references later.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit on 9 June 2022

edit

Can anyone please provide accurate sources than writing bogus on this page. Bhima never defeated karna other than the 14th day and even Then karna defeated bhima multiple times after that. This article is extremely biased and inconsistent. Shiraj chandra (talk) 18:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bhima and Rajasuya conquest

edit

Hello @Lord kai07:

I have noticed your change on Bhima's rajasuya conquest. You have edited the text stating that Bhima was defeated by Karna. Even though the reference link of KMG is stating otherwise. I would like to hear your thoughts on this.

I wanted to undo your revision. But noticed that you yourself has made this edit by undoing someone else's. I don't want to start an unintended edit war. Hence I am abstaining from it for now.

On another note. You have started an edit war with my previous edit regarding Bhima's fourteenth day of the war without providing a proper citation or starting a talk page topic as per the Wikipedia community guidelines. LakshmanReddy72 (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The problem is the KMG translation suffers from many issues. Most prominently, the translation isn't perfect and the source material (NC's compilation) is far from perfect, with many interpolations and additions from the author(s). For example, NC was a big fan of the Karna storyline, so he plays up a lot of those parts (for example, Karna doing a Rajasuya on Duryodhana's behalf is a complete interpolation).
But as a wikipedia editor, how do we solve this? The KMG version isn't any less worthy than the many other versions of the story. Take this specific issue of Bhima being defeated by Karna...regardless of where this "fact" originated from, it is definitely part of the Mahabhartha lore. It's there in the BORI edition, it's there in the ACK edition, it's there in the Rajagopalachari version, and it's there in BR Chopra's TV version. So personally, I'd have no problem just saying "Bhima was defeated by Karna on the 14th day". On the other hand, there's also a story of both Bhima and Satyaki independently defeating Karna but sparing him due to Arjuna's oath. This story, as far as I know, only exists in the KMG translation and the original NC source. So were I to include that in the article, I would say "per the Chathurduri compilation, Bhima defeated Karna". Pinkfloyd11 (talk) 20:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Pinkfloyd11: your reasoning only covers 14th day. However for Yudhishthira's Rajasuya conquest it is quite clear that Bhima is the victor. I gave chance to original editor to revisit it in case of a mistake. But he seems only intrested in Vandalising the page.
Regarding 14th day the text in Wikipedia is not consistent with Karna winning. Hence the query. LakshmanReddy72 (talk) 14:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
14th day battle is somewhat complex. With both Bhima and Karna winning and losing several times. How can we say that Karna ultimately won? That calls for a conclusion,based on interpretation. It's not like Karna completely eliminated Bhima for the day.
Regarding Rajasuya conquest I think it's ok to revert please let me know.
LakshmanReddy72 (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The details of Yudhisthira's Rajasuya conquest are an interpolation as well; they're only included in the KMG/NC version. Pinkfloyd11 (talk) 07:45, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Pinkfloyd11: this is the first time I am hearing about Yudhistira's Rajasuya conquest being an interpolation. Please share the source for my reference. Without it wouldn't entire story of Mahabharata be left with so many questions. The rest of the plot won't make sense. Bori too mentions Rajasuya yaga and Karma's defeat at the hands of Bhima (chapter 252(27))LakshmanReddy72 (talk) 18:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The Rajasuya conquest is not an interpolation, but the exact details of it are. IIRC, BORI edition choose to include the details (from the NC version) for the Rajasuya because the event itself is clearly part of the lore. Pinkfloyd11 (talk) 21:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
May I know the source for this. LakshmanReddy72 (talk) 14:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Pinkfloyd11:

The Karna s digvijay yatra isn't a complete interpolation. It's briefly mentioned in the BORI CE. Then bhima and satyaki beating karna isn't clear either. Multiple sources suggest that bhima had help from Arjuna and so did Karna.it wasn't an individual battle,rather a battle royale and Krishna helped satyaki by giving him his divine chariot. So these victories and defeats are uncertain with different outcomes across different versions. The 14th day edit clearly states "With the outcome changing every time". Meaning they both won and lost multiple times. Karna is given the victory, because he was the last man standing or the victor of the last battle, hence the winning conclusion. The rajasuya conquest is extremely unclear. Even the source says Bhima only subjugated Karna, but that doesn't mean it's a defeat. It could just have been a simple political discussion. Without any references,@Lakshmanreddy72:, personally attacks me for an unclear ,unsourced edit. Isn't that unprofessional? I don't want to start an edit war or any kind of discussion on that matter. If he has a verified source,which actually suggests bhima's Victory,then please be my guest and Change the edits , if not then end the discussion!Lord kai07 (talk) 06:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concluding the discussion about Rajasuya since it is already discussed on my talk page here [1].
In case anybody is interested, here is the link to BORI CE English translation which clearly states that Bhima defeated Karna in a battle in Rajasuya [2].
I am working on 14th day battle. Meanwhile adding Vikarna's defeat. I am surprised no one has added it till now. LakshmanReddy72 (talk) 16:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Rewritten

edit

This message is just to inform that the article has been rewritten with proper citations, so previous comments aren't applicable now Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 18:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply