(There wasn't really anything to merge at Artukid, so I redirected it. Adam Bishop 21:52, 17 August 2005 (UTC))Reply

That's cool too. Removing the merge-from template here. --Skoosh 00:01, 18 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Anyone want to make a redirect from "Ortukid?" So many archaic spellings...

Was the move to Artuklu really necessary? Is "Artuk" any better a transliteration than "Ortoq"? It also seems to me that Muslim dynasties are usually referred to as Fatimid, Abbasid, Hamdanid, etc etc...even the Turkish ones, Zengid, even Seljukid sometimes. Why "Artuklu"? Adam Bishop 15:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I read your message only today. When one googles Ortoqid, the only hits are wikipedia and its extensions. I could understand Artuqid, Brittanica refers to the dynasty as such, but Ortoqid is definitely alien and distant to the Turkish original spelling of the name of the family (Artuk, hence Artuklu for those of the Artuk), and shocking for a Turkish eye. Osmanli is sometimes used for Ottoman in English too. Artuqid is fine with me as well. Cretanforever

Ok, Artuqid it is. Thanks. Adam Bishop 01:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

 

Here's a coin of Yuluk Arslan. Feel free to insert it in the article. Cheers PHG (talk) 21:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

 

And a coin of Kara Arslan. Cheers PHG (talk) 21:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

And a coin of Artuk Arslan. PHG (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

 

 

 

More coins. Feel free to insert them in the article. PHG (talk) 20:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Per Honor et Gloria ✍ 05:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

• "Artuqid dynasty" -Llc minimum 61
• "Artukid dynasty" -Llc minimum 20
• "Artuqid principality" -Llc 4
• "Artukid principality" -Llc 9
• Anatolia Artukids -Llc minimum 130
• Anatolia Artuqids -Llc minimum 158

Takabeg (talk) 11:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Artuqids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060219091202/http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.tcl?site_id=7725 to http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.tcl?site_id=7725
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070704025027/http://www.itudergi.itu.edu.tr/tammetin/itu-a_2006_5_2_M_Guler.pdf to http://www.itudergi.itu.edu.tr/tammetin/itu-a_2006_5_2_M_Guler.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply