Talk:Annius of Viterbo

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2021 and 12 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Isabellazhang99.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

A number of issues need to be refined and clarified. A good place to start would be Anthony Grafton's 1991 book Forgers and Critics, which contains a good discussion of how Annius of Viterbo's works were used, discredited, etc., during the early modern period. 124.171.206.233 (talk) 23:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Humanistas estavam imbuído ideologicamente de desacreditar deliberadamente as obras judaico-cristãs existentes desde o inicio da idade média. Não se pode afirmar categoricamente que tais obras realmente eram invenções ou interpolações, como alguns descrentes querem afirmar, pelo contrário, o valor histórico-cultural de tais obras são inestimáveis e refletem com absoluta certeza uma mentalidade proveniente de uma tradição que faz parte do conjunto sócio-histórico-cultural que pelos métodos de análise historiográfico ajudam a construir a história mundial. É lamentável o puro desconstrutivismo sócio-histórico-cultural patrocinado e praticado por pessoas movidas exclusivamente por um sentimentalismo tóximo anti-judaico-cristão. 45.228.98.64 (talk) 18:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Annio da Viterbo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060219051905/http://www.italica.rai.it:80/rinascimento/parole_chiave/schede/borgia.htm to http://www.italica.rai.it/rinascimento/parole_chiave/schede/borgia.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The cited free paper doesn't indicate if De marmoreis volturrhenis tabulis is still unpublished or not. It was supposed since no work is listed under that title on WorldCat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.51.12.102 (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply