[go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Angie Ballard

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)
Good articleAngie Ballard has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 23, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 1, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Australian wheelchair racer Angie Ballard was named the Female Athlete of the Games for the 1999 Australia Junior Wheelchair Nationals?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 6, 2018.

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Angie Ballard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 11:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Will start the review tomorrow. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Great, thanks. 99of9 (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I know that these articles can be hard to assemble from a patchwork of sources

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
Ballard has held athletics scholarships at the Australian Institute of Sport (1999–2001), You should say "held" rather than "has held", and use "from 1999 to 2001" rather than a range.
also is used twice in the last sentences of the lead
  Done 99of9 (talk) 00:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Sources are okay
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
All the web sources require an access date, but it is missing from 1, 10 and 29
These should all be in the same format (I would prefer "23 April 2012" form but its up to you)
  Done 99of9 (talk) 00:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
  1. C. No original research:  
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
Early in her athletics career, Ballard and Louise Sauvage had the same coach Any idea who that was?
  Done Good idea. I found out it was Dawes too, which simplifies the sentence. Also added an extra cite about Sauvage as coach. --99of9 (talk) 01:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
  1. B. Focused:  
  2. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  3. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Appropriately tagged
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  5. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Weight?

edit

Does she really way 35 kilograms as it says in the source? That sounds like a typo to me; it seems dangerously underweight considering her height. Or does paraplegia have a huge impact on things like that? I hate weight fields anyway, as a person's weight constantly fluctuates. Graham87 01:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

My understanding is that it does have a big effect on leg-muscle mass, which is a pretty big component of overall weight. Competition weight is of serious interest to some athletes like boxers, but I'd be fine with leaving it off a track athlete. You're right about fluctuations, I think I saw a 40kg mentioned in another source, but I went for this because it was a competition-weight. --99of9 (talk) 02:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
I re-found the 40kg ref and have put it in. I'm happy to go with consensus on whether to exclude the info entirely. --99of9 (talk) 02:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good to me now. Graham87 03:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angie Ballard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Angie Ballard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply