Talk:Acer Iconia

There is a bit of confusion between the two articles. The Acer Iconia article has some content referring to the Acer Iconia Tab.

Acer considers both devices to be tablets (http://www.acer.com.au/ac/en/AU/content/group/tablets), so this suggests the articles should be merged, in one direction or another. I believe that a 'Tab' section of the Acer Iconia page would be more logical. Thoughts?

Maybe in the interim, a picture should be added to the Acer Iconia page to help disambiguate the pages on first-sight?

Shadow XVII (talk) 08:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think that, despite having similar names, these devices are very different. On the one hand, you have a two-screen laptop running Windows (Iconia); on the other hand, you have a serie of tablets running mostly Android (Iconia tab). It's only confusing because Acer has chosen to name them similarly. Zorun (talk) 12:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'd have to agree with Zorun. Despite similar form factors and names they're nothing alike. One is x86 based running Windows, the other is ARM based running Android. Acer differentiates the two by calling them Iconia Tab A(for Android) and Iconia Tab W(for Windows). I put forward adding that to the titles of the pages. Tului (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Acer Iconia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120729115023/http://www.cnbc.com/id/40346365/Acer_Unveils_New_Tablets_to_Compete_with_Apple to http://www.cnbc.com/id/40346365/Acer_Unveils_New_Tablets_to_Compete_with_Apple

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply