Talk:Orica
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed edits to page
edit| The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The user with the COI has been blocked indefinitely as a promotional account. |
Proposed draft
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orica Limited (ASX: ORI) is an Australian-based multinational corporation that is the world’s largest provider of commercial explosives and blasting systems to the mining, quarrying, oil and gas and construction markets, a supplier of sodium cyanide for gold extraction, and a specialist provider of ground support services in mining and tunnelling.
HistoryeditInitially formed over 140 years ago as Jones, Scott and Co., a supplier of explosives during the Victorian gold rush, the company was bought by Nobel Industries. Nobel later merged with several British chemical manufacturers to form Imperial Chemical Industries. In 1928, Imperial Chemical Industries of Australia and New Zealand (ICIANZ) was incorporated to acquire and coordinate all the Australasian interests of ICI Plc.
Financial PerformanceeditOrica's revenue in 2016 was AUD$5.1 billion and statutory net profit after tax (NPAT) attributable to the shareholders of Orica for the full year ended 30 September 2016 was $343 million.[2]
LeadershipeditChairman The Board chairman is Malcolm Broomhead, Non-Executive Director of Orica Limited since December 2015 and Chairman as of 1 January 2016. Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee.[3] Director of BHP Billiton Ltd & Plc. Former Chairman of Asciano Limited. Director of the Walter & Eliza Hall Institute, Chairman of the Australia China One Belt One Road Advisory Board and Council Member of Opportunity International Australia.
The Managing Director and CEO of Orica is Alberto Calderon. Non-Executive Director since August 2013. Appointed Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer on 19 May 2015. Former Group Executive and Chief Executive of BHP Billiton, Aluminium, Nickel and Corporate Development. Former Chief Executive Officer of Cerrejón Coal Company and Colombian oil company, Ecopetrol. Member of Investment Advisory Committee for New York Mining Fund AR Capital GP II Ltd.
SustainabilityeditOrica is a member of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), the Australian SAM Sustainability Index (AuSSI) and the FTSE4Good Index. These Indexes provide a benchmark for the performance of investments in sustainable companies and funds. Orica releases an annual Sustainability Report that outlines performance against key sustainability metrics.[4]
Markets/IndustrieseditOrica operates across the following markets and industries:
Products & ServiceseditOrica operates three primary business areas:
Orica is the world’s largest provider of commercial explosives and blasting systems to the mining, quarrying, oil and gas and construction markets. [6] Products and services include:
Trade names used for packaged explosives include: Senatel™, Fortel™, Apex™, Amex™, Impact™, Simex™, Powergel™ and Eurodyn™.[7] "Power Gel" was a U.S. Registered Trademark for Hercules Inc. in 1967, but it is now owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty Ltd.[8][9]
In 2015 Orica Limited restructured its ground support operations under a dedicated global management team, and re-established the well-known and highly regarded Minova name and brand.[10] Minova is a global manufacturer and supplier of chemical and mechanical earth control products, adhesives and support equipment. With manufacturing plants on five continents and operations in more than 25 countries, Minova is a provider of ground support solutions for the underground mining, construction, tunnelling and civil engineering industries. Minova is a member of the Orica Group. Products and services include:
For more information regarding Minova, please visit 'www.minovaglobal.com'
Orica is a supplier of sodium cyanide for gold extraction. Products and services include:
Cycling SponsorshipeditOrica is co-naming sponsor of the Orica–Scott men’s and women’s professional cycling team. In June 2016, Orica announced that it would be exiting its sponsorship of the men’s and women’s cycling teams at the end of the 2017 calendar year.[11]
Orica HouseeditOnce Australia's tallest building, the former ICI Building in East Melbourne, now Orica House, was Australia's tallest during the 1950s[citation needed] and was one of the first high-rise buildings in Australia's cities. It is one of the few post-war office buildings to be found on the Victorian Heritage Register.[citation needed]
IncidentseditCorporateeditBullying ScandaleditIn March 2015 then CEO Ian Smith was ousted from the business due to bullying of a female employee.[12] In AustraliaeditBotany, New South WaleseditChlorination of the Botany aquifereditRemediation began in 2005 after production of chlorinated solvents by ICI over many years resulted in significant contamination of the Botany aquifer, a high quality sand aquifer located below the eastern suburbs of Sydney, New South Wales. The main chemical contaminant found in groundwater around the old ICI site is EDC (1,2-dichloroethane), a persistent organic pollutant and byproduct of the manufacture of PVC. Orica has built an A$167 million Groundwater Treatment Plant (GTP) to achieve containment of this contamination and provide high quality industrial water to Botany Industrial Park. Water produced by Orica's GTP saves Sydney's potable water supply around 5 megalitres (1.1 million imperial gallons; 1.3 million US gallons) per day (approx 0.5% of Sydney's water demand). Residents in the area were banned from accessing the groundwater. Orica estimated in 2012 that the GTP had been in operation for seven years of its 30–year design life cycle.[13] Mercury leak, 2011editThe Botany chemical plant released mercury vapour into the atmosphere on 27 September 2011, breaching environmental standards for nine hours.[14][15] An air monitor located near residents at Banksmeadow[16] detected the mercury vapour and the Office of Environment and Heritage was notified.[14] Dr Mariann Lloyd Smith, said the length of time the emissions last was extraordinary, "Mercury is extremely toxic. It is recognised as one of the most important and most hazardous toxins that we deal with, and there is currently a UN negotiation for a global treaty on mercury to address this," she said.[15] The mercury vapour was associated with mercury which had polluted the soil on the Orica site, due to leaking pipes.[14] Robyn Parker, the New South Wales Minister for the Environment & Heritage said "I am incredibly angry and disappointed that yet again we have another incident with Orica."[15] In January 2013, the NSW EPA announced that it would conduct a review of off-site emissions of mercury.[17] Mercury leak, 2012editOn 17 January 2012 Orica reported a mercury leak at its Port Botany plant, the second mercury incident since August 2011. In a series of samples of environmental air, the EPA recorded a mercury level of 0.0049 grams per cubic metre (8.3×10−6 pounds per cubic yard); more than double the regulatory limit of 0.002 grams per cubic metre (3.4×10−6 pounds per cubic yard).[18] The leak occurred in December 2011 and Orica failed to report the leak to authorities until the following month.[19] The site of the breach was the thermal desorbtion stack at the company's carpark waste remediation project, which was closed when the breach occurred. The NSW Environmental Protection Authority said the incident was not linked to the mercury emissions breach in September at Orica's other Botany site on Beauchamp Road.[20] Gladstone, QueenslandeditCyanide leaks, 2012editOn 8 June 2012 the Queensland Department of Environment launched a legal prosecution against Orica in the Gladstone Magistrates' Court. The company was charged with 279 counts of willfully contravening its approvals in relation to alleged cyanide leaks into Gladstone Harbour.[21] The government claimed that in January and February 2012, Orica discharged effluent water containing heightened levels of cyanide into Gladstone Harbour.[22] "The charges are related to allegations that the company did not inform The Department of the Environment. The charges related to a breach of conditions rather than any environmental harm per se".[23] Kooragang Island, New South WaleseditThroughout August and December 2011 Orica had six major chemicals incidents or leaks in Australia. The first one was a leak of hexavalent chromium from its ammonium nitrate plant near Stockton that affected 70 households; the second one was the release of arsenic into the Hunter River at Newcastle; the third was of mercury vapours from its Botany site;[24] the fourth was a leak of ammonia from its site at Kooragang Island;[25] the fifth was an ammonium nitrate leak of 20,000 litres (4,400 imperial gallons; 5,300 US gallons) at its Kooragang Island plant, only a day after being allowed to reopen; and the sixth incident was a sulphuric acid leak of approximately 3,000–4,000 litres (660–880 imp gal; 790–1,060 US gal) at its Port Kembla site.[26] The fourth leak triggered a public forum and NSW Government investigation into the leaks, and the temporary shut down of the Kooragang Island plant.[25] Hexavalent chromium leak, 2011editOrica’s Kooragang Island chemical plant released hexavalent chromium into the atmosphere on 8 August 2011. The known carcinogen was released between 6 and 6:30pm and the spill continued for approximately 20 minutes.[27] An estimated 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) of hexavalent chromium was discharged from the Orica plant, with another 35–60 grams (1.2–2.1 oz) over the suburb of Stockton.[28][29] Approximately 20 workers at the plant were exposed as well as 70 nearby homes in Stockton.[30] Orica failed to notify government authorities until 16 hours after the incident and residents were not formally notified for three days.[31] Under a Prevention Notice issued on 11 August 2011, the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) closed the ammonia plant at Kooragang Island.[32] The hexavalent chromium leak was the subject of a New South Wales Parliament Upper House inquiry, that was concluded in February 2012. Hunter River arsenic leak, 2011editEffluent containing high levels of arsenic leaked into the Hunter River from the Kooragang Island chemical plant on 19 August 2011 at 3pm.[33] Arsenic had not been used on the site since 1993, however during a cleanup of a hexavalent chromium spill on the site the week prior, old deposits of arsenic leaked into a storage pond and drained into the Hunter River.[34] It was estimated the arsenic concentration was 0.067 milligrams per litre, exceeding licence limits.[34] Barry O'Farrell, the NSW Premier said "two spills in a fortnight raise reasonable concerns about systemic failures in the way in which this company is operating its facilities."[35] O'Farrell continued, "I've had a gutful of families being distressed, by potential threats to their safety and threats to their local environment."[34] Ammonia leak, 2011editOn 9 November 2011 more than 900 kilograms (2,000 lb) of ammonia was initially suspected of venting to the atmosphere from the Kooragang Island plant during a 45-minute period. The venting was due to a relief valve operating to prevent overpressure of a liquid ammonia tank. Engineering studies subsequently revised the amount down to ~90 kilograms (200 lb).[36] The leak was identified by firefighters responding to an alarm raised by the hospitalisation of two railway workers at Mayfield who were affected by the plume of escaping gas.[37] Six fire units and a hazardous chemicals unit were called to the chemical plant to deal with the leak of the ammonia gas.[38] Despite initial statements by Orica that the leak posed no public health risk,[38] two rail workers in the nearby suburb of Mayfield East were overcome by ammonia fumes and were taken to hospital with breathing difficulties.[36] Less than an hour before the ammonia leak, the Environment Protection Authority announced it would take Orica to court over the hexavalent chromium leak which occurred on 8 August 2011 at the same plant.[38] Ammonium nitrate leak, 2011editOn 7 December 2011, in excess of 20,000 litres (4,400 imp gal; 5,300 US gal) of weak ammonium nitrate (<35%) solution/fertilizer leaked onto grassed areas at the Kooragang Island chemical plant. Emergency services were called to the site including a HAZMAT team.[39] The spill occurred less than a day after the Environmental Protection Agency announced it would allow the reopening of part of the Kooragang Island plant. Local residents continued to criticise the company for failing to notify residents in a timely manner and called for the plant to remain closed.[40] Hydrogen stack fire, 2012editOn 8 January 2012 lightning ignited hydrogen being released from the plant. Flames higher than 20 metres (66 ft) leapt from the hydrogen stack and were reported by local residents to authorities.[41] Port Kembla, New South WaleseditSulphuric acid leak, 2011editA spill of approximately 3,000–4,000 litres (660–880 imperial gallons; 790–1,060 US gallons) of concentrated sulphuric acid occurred at the Port Kembla chemical plant on 16 December 2011.[42] The leak was suspected to be caused by a hole in the ship-to-shore pipeline. Acting chief environmental regulator Mark Gifford from the NSW EPA said he was concerned about the ongoing incidents with Orica.[43] In MexicoeditCoahuilaeditExplosion, 2007editWikinews has related news:
On 10 September 2007, 28 people were killed and over 250 injured in Coahuila, Mexico, as a result of an accident between a pick-up and a truck which resulted in an explosion. The truck was transporting about 25 metric tons of ammonium nitrate under contract for the company Orica near the cities of Monclova and Cuatro Cienegas. Exact numbers of the dead and injured vary according to source. Orica's website stated there were a total of 28 fatalities in 2007 - one worker and 27 contractors/members of the public.[44][45][46] Referencesedit
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Oricacc (talk) 03:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Oricacc, and thank you for your suggestions. Unfortunately, your proposed text is too promotional and does not adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising, marketing or public relations, but the purpose of your proposed text is clearly to win over prospective customers and investors. As such, it cannot be added to the article unless it is substantially rewritten. The most obvious red flags are phrases that are frequently used in press releases, but are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. These promotional terms include phrases such as "global leader," "commitment to the safety, health and wellbeing of its people and customers," and the entirety of the "Our purpose," "Our strategy," and "Our values" sections. You see, a Wikipedia article is not supposed to act as a corporate "About us" page. Just as importantly, watch out for sentences that sound vaguely positive, but don't actually tell the reader anything specific. They should be condensed and written more tersely.
- If you would like to have just the financial figures updated, I can easily do that for you. But any modifications of the text that could be seen as promotional will face much heavier scrutiny. Best, Altamel (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback Altamel, this was very helpful. I have revised the proposed edits above in lieu of your feedback and Wikipedia's policies to ensure a neutral tone and position. Please advise if these edits would be suitable for publishing. Regards --Oricacc (talk) 03:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Style
editLanguage
editRephrase "pick-up and a trailer" re. incident. —DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 23:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC))
Undue weight?
editI'm not generally a wikipedia editor so forgive me if I'm doing this wrong, but I just happened across this article and it seems to me that the "Incidents" section is way out of balance with the rest of the article in length (it seems to be more than half the article!), and focuses entirely on incidents since 2007 and almost entirely on incidents since 2011, all within Australia. Perhaps this section should be shrunk down or the size of the rest of the article increased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.176.234 (talk) 21:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
australia
editOrica incidents could end up in court, AAP, September 28, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.108.227 (talk) 00:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Content
editI think that someone messed with the article by writing "With the growing global financial crisis, the Orica board opted to restructure its entire workforce. As of September 2013, the entire Orica workforce is composed of 100,000 Minions under their new line manager, Malanie Tran." in the History section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranic16 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Incidents in Australia
editThis section needs restructuring. There are six incidents listed under "Kooragang Island"
- Hexavalent chromium leak (KI)
- Arsenic leak into Hunter river (KI)
- Mercury vapours (Botany)
- Ammonia leak (KI)
- Ammonium nitrate leak (KI)
- Sulfuric acid leak (Port Kembla)
but two of them were not at KI. The mercury vapours leak at Botany is described three paragraphs earlier, while the sulfuric acid leak is described (correctly) under Port Kembla six paragraphs later.
The paragraph about the six incidents should be relocated to follow the In Australia heading. Perhaps list the incidents in chronological order rather than by site?