| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Southern Watch article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biased?
editI'm not sure where this is biased or how to unbias it. The closest thing to a bias I see is the mention that Iraq engaged in several aggressive acts -- but this is a military term, not a political one. The actions of the Iraqi military can be properly classified as aggressions, regardless of the intent. Perhaps rewording the sentence would help?
LordHedgie 23:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
I was the tagger. I agree with you that it's hard to see where it's biased, and I may have been a little too quick on the POV trigger. However, the whole article _feels_ Ameri-centric and imperialist. Don't know how that feeling can be translated into constructive edits though. Rusty 02:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)