Talk:Nanded

The figure Population (2001)

 28,68,158 (2.8 million) sounds a bit higher .. can someone confirm the figure?

While article in Marathi language mr:गोदावरी नदी about en:Godavari River is developing we seek co-operation for more information related to

• Tributories coming from Karnatak,andhra,orisa,
• Erigation Projects on Godavari and Tributories
• Urban Settelements/Cities located on bank of Godavari
• Flood controll lines on Godavari for various cities
• Industries and industrial pollution on Godavari
• Translation from Marathi to English article also is welcome

-विजय 11:07, 18 ऑगस्ट 2006 (UTC)

The Infobox had the latitude and longtude values switched. As a result, the city was not located on the map show. I changed (77.0° N 18.5° E) to (19.09° N 77.27° E). Note that besides swapping the latitude and longtidude, I have also changed the values slightly. These values were taken from [1]. I don't know of an authoritative source, but these new values appear to correct by checking a map.

In article text itself says "Its Longitude 77.7 to 78.15. East and Its Latitude is 18.15 to 19.55". The new latitude value I have set in the Infobox falls just outside this range. However, I don't know the correct range for the limits of the city, so I have left it as it is. If anyone has accurate information, please update the text. --Chipmunk 18:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC) Aditya.raghavan (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The first paragraph is a little ambiguous "Nanded is a typical mid sized city in Maharashtra. However due in part to its location and history, it is more diverse than its peers. Majority of the people 95% speak Marathi. About 5%% of its population is Muslim and speaks a Deccan version of Urdu. Another 4% is Punjabi/Hindi speaking Sikhs. Also there is substantial amount of Telugu speakers."

The percentages don't make sense. In case some people are bilingual speakers, it should be mentioned. No references for the demographics.

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://srtmun.ac.in/Aboutsrtmun.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Danger (talk) 13:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

There has been mass edits and vandalism on this page by unknown IP addresses. So I am requesting for semi-protection where only registered users can edit the article.--Rizwanmahai (talk) 04:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC) @Vin09: and @Human3015: I need your consent.--Rizwanmahai (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Rizwanmahai: Semi-protection is usually done for recent vandalism. Last IP edit was yesterday which was not vandalism. Before that IP editing was on 5th August, 12 days ago, which is not recent, so it is less likely that page will get semi-protected as of now. If we find IP vandalism in future then we can request semi-protection by using twinkle. Regards. --Human3015^{Send WikiLove}  05:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Human3015: Bro, but there has been mass edits every alternate day in the month of June and I have tried cleaning up this article many times and each time a new IP creates non sense.--Rizwanmahai (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Rizwanmahai: June is not relevant today, admins semi-protect page only for recent ongoing disruptive editing. We can watch for page, if any IP repeatedly does any disruptive editing then we can ask for semi-protection that too for limited time. Even if I ask or 5 people ask for semi-protection of this article, still no admin will do that. --Human3015^{Send WikiLove}  05:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Support@Human3015:. Vandalism means a number of edits by IPs in the recent days. @Rizwanmahai: one or two can be tackled by users by reverting or correcting. Thanks.--Vin09 (talk) 06:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Not done requests for page protection must be made at WP:Requests for page protection and currently, this page would not qualify - Arjayay (talk) 08:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok--Rizwanmahai (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nanded/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 21:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

A Guru never dies but attains immortality. My family has been visiting the place since 25 years and the local people never say that Guru Gobind Singh Ji died here but they say he attained immortality here. We should restrict ourselves from using this terminology completely as it is disrespectful. The second thing is that it is mandatory to use Ji as we are referring to God here. It is a necessity. Let us all be respectful to God. Knowledge should teach us the right things in the way they are ought to be learned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paramdeeptung (talk • contribs) 20:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

• As I said elsewhere: Wikipedia is not a religious text. It doesn't use honorifics with the names of personalities of various religions (except in direct quotes), and it doesn't include religious beliefs presented as a fact. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nanded. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928012021/http://beed.nic.in/htmldocs/socioeco.htm to http://beed.nic.in/htmldocs/socioeco.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply