 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Minter Ellison should now be written as one word MinterEllison. This change occured as part of the 2015 brand refresh. Huckledust (talk) 04:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
There have only been certain minor edits to the article since 2005 when it was posted by someone with a Minter Ellison e-mail account. This is clearly corporate propaganda that has been dutifully maintained by wikimembers since 2005. Their updating and clarifying of links could have been done to an article that does not fall under the Wikipedia guidelines of spam. Please delete this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Derelictdan (talk • contribs) 01:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
The user with a Minter Ellison email account has their association with the firm outlined on user page. View page Maria.nadalin@minterellison.com119.225.81.203 (talk) 04:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Tags, wikification and upcoming stalking
editI have just done some edits to this article that involve removal of press-release-like text, wikification, tagging for sources, and more. Everyone is welcome to work together in doing the much needed improvement work for this article. That said, I foresee a delusional depressive user (who stalks every single edit I do) will come and revert all of my edits at once, and start working on this article as if he was ever interested in the subject. I could not emphasize more how stupid such behavior his. If a user wants to find sources statements I had tagged, he does not need to revert all my edits with a road roller as if they were vandalism.
If one wants to use my contribution history as a list of suggested articles to improve, one will have to learn to work collaboratively with me.
Thanks, --damiens.rf 02:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)