Operation Woodrose was a military operation carried out by the Indira Gandhi-led Indian government in the months after Operation Blue Star to "prevent the outbreak of widespread public protest" in the state of Punjab.[1] The government arrested all prominent members of the largest Sikh political party, the Akali Dal, and banned the All India Sikh Students Federation, a large students' union.[1] In addition, the Indian Army conducted operations in the countryside during which thousands of Sikhs, overwhelmingly young men, were detained for interrogation and subsequently tortured.[1] Despite its purported success in controlling the armed insurgency in the Punjab region, the operation was criticized by human-rights groups for the suspension of civil liberties and habeas corpus, resulting in the disappearances of thousands of Sikh men. After the operation, the central government was criticized for using "draconian legislation" to repress a minority community.[1]
| Operation Woodrose | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the Khalistan movement & Insurgency in Punjab | |||||||
 State of Punjab shown in red | |||||||
| |||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| More than 100,000 Sikh civilians reported killed or missing;[2][4] true number unknown[5] | |||||||
Conduct of the operation
editThe operation consisted of the rounding up of thousands of Sikh youth and civilians. Troops would lay siege to targeted villages in the early-morning hours, confining the inhabitants to their houses and stopping all movement out of the village while conducting house-to house raids. Some villages experienced repeated sieges.[6] Sikh homes were raided indiscriminately, with an overwhelming number of detained being innocents.[2]
According to estimates published by Inderjit Singh Jaijee, approximately 8,000 individuals were reported as missing or killed by October 1984 as a result of Army operations during Woodrose alone (not including Operation Blue Star where over 5,000 civilians were killed[7][8]) by state media, though Punjabi-language media estimated much higher figures.[2] According to Dr. Sangat Singh, who served in the Joint Intelligence Committee of the Government of India in the 1970s, about 100,000 youth had been taken into custody within the first four to six weeks of the operation, with many not heard from again,[9] with many taken into custody beaten and tortured.[5]
The operation was mainly concentrated in the border districts, and all amritdhari, or initiated, Sikh men from ages 15 to 60, particularly between 15 and 35, were referred to as "potential" terrorists in Army communiqués and targeted and taken from border villages.[2][9] Since the most likely targets were youth, many would try to flee across the border to Pakistan as the army approached. At first, Pakistani authorities jailed them as trespassers, before realizing their potential use, exploiting their resentment and distress to return a number of them as armed, motivated militants.[6] About 20,000 fleeing youth are estimated to have crossed the border.[9] Extrajudicial abuse extended even to distinguished Sikh army veterans;[5] as Sikh ex-servicemen formed a large proportion of the rural Sikh population at about half a million at any given time.[6] Between the army's treatment of youth, veterans, and the old and infirm, rumors abounded in the countryside that the state was trying to wipe out the younger generation of a small minority and was systematically engaged in its suppression. An atmosphere of fear and suspicion continued in the countryside for several months.[6] Even after the formal end of the operation in September 1984, the community remained at the mercy of the authoritarian state apparatus; its deep, long-lasting sense of distress and disgruntlement would later become a significant factor in precipitating the subsequent militancy.[10]
Even after the operation, hundreds of men, women, and even children, picked up from the countryside, remained incarcerated.[11]
Punjab-Chandigarh Disturbed Area Act (1983) and other measures
editTo allow for the legality of the operation, the states of Punjab and Chandigarh had been declared by the Indian government as 'disturbed areas' by the enactment of the Punjab Chandigarh Disturbed Area Act 1983,[12] while the Army was given unprecedented powers to detain and arrest civilians by the enactment of the Armed Forces (Punjab and Chandigarh) Act 1983.[13] The act empowered any commissioned, warrant or non-commissioned officer of the Army if "of opinion that it is necessary so to do for the maintenance of public order, after giving such due warning as he may consider necessary, fire upon or otherwise use forces, even to the causing of death". The act also allowed such an officer to "arrest, without warrant, any person who has committed a cognizable offence or against whom a reasonable suspicion exists that he has committed or is about to commit a cognizable offence".
Fast Track courts were set up under the Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act 1984 [14] to try to sentence suspected terrorists rapidly.[15]
Outcome
editPunjab Chief of Police, Kanwar Pal Singh Gill described the actions as "suffering from all the classical defects of army intervention in civil strife" and stated that the Indian Army had acted "blindly".[16]
The army operations were overseen by Major General Jagdish Singh Jamwal, who was assigned the responsibility to seal the international border with Pakistan, in an attempt to control smuggling of arms and personnel, and by Lieutenant General Ranjit Singh Dyal, who was instructed to oversee the apprehension of militants in state of Punjab.[2]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c d e f Deol, Harnik (2000). Religion and nationalism in India: the case of the Punjab. Psychology Press. pp. 108–111. ISBN 978-0-415-20108-7. Retrieved 22 July 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f Jaijee, Inderjit Singh (1999). Politics of Genocide: Punjab 1984-1998. Ajanta Publications. pp. 108, 150. ISBN 978-81-202-0415-7.
- ^ Dhillon, Kirpal S. (2006). Identity and Survival: Sikh Militancy in India, 1978-1993. London, United Kingdom: Penguin Books. pp. 188–190, 207. ISBN 9780143100362.
- ^ Singh, Sangat (2010). The Sikhs in History (PDF). Gurmat Vacheer. p. 387. ISBN 9780955458736.
- ^ a b c Singh, Harjinder (2014). Reflections on 1984. Akaal Publishers. pp. 86–88. ISBN 9780955458736.
- ^ a b c d Dhillon 2006, p. 189.
- ^ Grewal, J. S. (1998). The Sikhs of the Punjab (The New Cambridge History of India II.3) (Revised ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p. 227. ISBN 9781316025338. Retrieved 16 April 2020.
...the total casualties of officers and men were about 700 and of civilians about 5,000.
- ^ Karim, Afsir (1991). Counter Terrorism, the Pakistan Factor. Lancer Publishers. p. 35. ISBN 978-8170621270.
As far as the competence of the Army the less said the better. In an age where a handful of Israeli or German commandos could, through a well-planned action overcome a well-entrenched enemy thousands of miles away from them, the best our generals could do was to storm the Temple complex with tanks and armoured cars, blast the Akal Takht to get at Bhindranwale and 200 of his men. In crossfire upwards of 5,000 people, a majority of them pilgrims, including women and children, lost their lives.... Far from doing a competent job, our army commanders botched up a simple operation.
- ^ a b c Singh, Sangat Singh (1995). The Sikhs in History. The University of Michigan. p. 387. ISBN 978-8172052768.
- ^ Dhillon 2006, p. 190.
- ^ Dhillon 2006, p. 207.
- ^ THE CHANDIGARH DISTURBED AREAS ACT, 1983 : Legal India :: Legal India : Law Information Portal of India
- ^ [The] Armed Forces (Punjab And Chandigarh)
- ^ Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act 1984
- ^ Darshi, A R (1999). The gallant defender. Sikh Students Federation. p. 108. ISBN 81-7601-468-0.
- ^ Art, Robert J. (2007). Democracy and counterterrorism: lessons from the past. United States Institute of Peace. p. 441. ISBN 978-1-929223-93-0.