Welcome to the talk page of Welshleprechaun - long time diva

Userboxes

Languages en This user is a native speaker of the English language. fr-3 Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau avancé de français. de-3 Dieser Benutzer hat sehr gute Deutschkenntnisse. es-2 Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español. nl-2 Deze gebruiker heeft een middelmatige kennis van het Nederlands. cy-1 Fe all y defnyddiwr 'ma gyfrannu ar lefel syml y Gymraeg. ca-1 Aquest usuari pot contribuir amb un nivell bàsic de català. ... This user would like to be able to speak more languages. Mae'r defnyddiwr hwn yn Gymro/Gymraes This user is Welsh This user is European. This user lives in the United Kingdom. Travels  Australia  Cyprus  Germany  Poland  Spain  United Kingdom  Austria  England  Greece  Scotland   Switzerland  Wales  Belgium  France  Hong Kong  Singapore  Turkey About me This user has been on Wikipedia for 18 years, 3 months and 19 days. This user is male. This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know. This editor is a Veteran Editor and is entitled to display this Iron Editor Star. This user is a participant in WikiProject Wales. This user is a member of the Cardiff WikiProject – You can help! This user is a participant in WikiProject Eurovision. This user is a participant in WikiProject Cycling. This user is a member of WikiProject UK Railways. This user is a participant in WikiProject Buses. This user participates in WikiProject Skyscrapers. Preferences UK This user uses British English. This user prefers the metric system.

Barnstars
The Editor's Barnstar I have noticed that your edits on Cardiff (and many others), and I believe they deserve recognition and so I've decided to award you this Editor's Barnstar. Seth Whales (talk) 07:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply] The WikiProject Barnstar Great work in starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Cardiff. Seth Whales (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cardiff North (geographical area) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiff North (geographical area) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dear Project Eurovision Member,

There is a serious discussion been created at the WikiProject Eurovision talk page that requires utmost attention from all, or as many members as possible, as this could bear a huge impact on the project as a whole. Please click here to read the discussion, and participate peacefully. Thank you.
This message was delivered at 04:41, 23 November 2014 (UTC) by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of Project Eurovision Newsdesk

User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox5, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox5 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox5 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 06:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've also nominated User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox8, User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox6, User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox4, User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox7, User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox3/Baycar, User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox3/Capital City Red, User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox3/Capital City Green, User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox2, User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox3/Cardiff Bus route 52/52A, Cheers, –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 06:06, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

→ Issue 44 ← Headlines Review of 2014, and a look ahead to 2015. Voting fraud from Turkmenistan and Bosnia-Herzegovina at Türkvizyon 2014 Udo Jürgens winner of Eurovision 1966 dies aged 80.
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Number of articles	Good articles	A-class articles	Feature articles	Number of members
5620	21	1	4	111
• HOME • TALK • PORTAL • NEWSDESK • UNSUBSCRIBE • ARCHIVES • • Published by the Eurovision WikiProject •

This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of Wesley Mouse 18:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision inactivity notice for Welshleprechaun!

As part of our commitment to improve collaborations within WikiProject Eurovision we have now started to undergo annual checks for membership activity. Upon checking it appears that you have been inactive for more than 12 months, and we are sorry to see that you have not contributed and hope that you decide to return to Wikipedia in the near future. In the meantime in order to cease the receipt of any further correspondence from the project whilst you are inactive, we have removed your details from our members list. If you would like to rejoin the project upon your return to Wikipedia, then please feel free to re-add your details to this list.

We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your contributions throughout your time with WikiProject Eurovision, and hope that you return to active editing in the near future. Regards! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox5 your sandbox pages have been emptied. You are welcome to reuse them in the future. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox3/Cardiff Bus route 61, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox3/Cardiff Bus route 61 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Welshleprechaun/Sandbox3/Cardiff Bus route 61 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 19:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, great diagram, but do you have a present day one, please ? Sept 2017 ? Cheers,.Tony <><

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CrossCountry network map is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrossCountry network map until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jc86035 (talk) 13:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Major railway stations in the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusCapitalCityGreen.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute2.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute13.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute21.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute92.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusCapitalCityRed.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute30.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute52a.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute86.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusBayCar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute23.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute93.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute94.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute95.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute24.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute39.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute41.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute9.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute28.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute29.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute36.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute52.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute53.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute60.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute101.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute102.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute7.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute35.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute8.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute45.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute50.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute51.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute57b58b.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute9a.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute44.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute97a.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRouteU1.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute25.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute33b.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute96.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoutex91.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute11.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute29b.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute33a.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute97.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute5758.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute1718.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute12.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute98.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute33.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRouteU2.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute27.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:CardiffBusRoute49.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute61.jpg
• File:CardiffBusRoute8585a.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article See Monkey Do Monkey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/See Monkey Do Monkey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 20:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CardiffBusRoute6262a.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CrossCountry network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrossCountry network until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Capital Region Tourism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient secondary sources to demonstrate notability per WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 16:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As there is more than one Haymarket bus station, I have moved the one in Newcastle to Haymarket bus station, Newcastle upon Tyne. I would currently sign but I am having trouble finding the symbol. Difficultly north (talk) Time, department skies 17:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC) Difficultly north (talk) Time, department skies 18:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A4232 road has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]