User talk:Terlob

Archives

October 2006 - September 2013 October 2013 - December 2015

Jack Booth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Articles I've tagged had only one source each. Possibly more references have been added thereafter. If I am mistaken, please provide links to articles incorrectly tagged. Thanks! Moksh Juneja (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mokshjuneja: The articles Dick Campbell (Australian footballer), Jim Crow (footballer), Jim Stewart (footballer, born 1888)‎, Bobby Rowe (Australian footballer), Artie Pattinson, Ted Alcorn, and Billy Egan all have references to The Encyclopedia of AFL Footballers, AFL Tables and AustralianFootball.com, and had them before your edits. Terlob (talk) 10:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links are NOT references, the references/ notes section only has ONE reference in the notes section of articles I have tagged. Moksh Juneja (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Template:Refimprove page guideline on usage has the following in it's first paragraph:

This template indicates that the article needs additional inline citations. This template should be used only for articles where there are some, but insufficient, inline citations to support the material currently in the article. Don't use this tag for articles that contain no unreferenced material, even if all the material is supported by a single citation.

The provided reference supports all of the material in the page. Secondly, that same page also suggests:

Some editors understand this template to be redundant when it is used on articles clearly marked as stubs.

Every single one of the articles you have tagged is marked as a stub on the talk page. There is no benefit from tagging these articles. If you are that set on the fact that the single reference is insufficent, you can move the external link to a reference and site it in the article. Terlob (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In such a scenario, per WP:GENREF, you must add the links to the references section and not the external links section. Moksh Juneja (talk) 05:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mokshjuneja: I'm not understanding what you mean by "In such a scenario". The single in-line source supports all of the material in each article, so there is no need to tag it per the instructions at Template:refimprove. Even WP:GENREF gives the guidance:

The disadvantage of using general references alone is that text–source integrity is lost, unless the article is very short.

All of these articles are short. Where additional information is added, sources are given in line for the additional information - for example Stan Brady was created by me, and the new information added was supported by a new source. There is no information that is not referenced. Terlob (talk) 05:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have given your own answer when you quoted from GENREF as these articles are indeed short. I do not see the point in taking this conversation any further. Bye, Moksh Juneja (talk) 06:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It says "unless the article is very short". It looks like we're not going to get very far with this - I'm going to ask for a third opinion. Terlob (talk) 06:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• 3O Request Greetings, both. Terlob requested a 3rd opinion on this dispute, but this is a completely non-binding process, and my opinion carries the same weight as any other user's. After reviewing the guidelines, I believe that the use of a refimprove tag on an article such as this (which was the state of the article before it was tagged) is inappropriate, because there is no uncited material in the article. The template documentation is quite clear on that point. I would even go further and say that if in a longer article, a single section, or a single sentence, is uncited, you should use the inline or section tags, and not refimprove. That said, those articles really are very short, and this one, at least, was not tagged as a stub at that point. Therefore, the stub tag inserted by Moksh Juneja was quite appropriate, and takes care of all the issues at that point in time. Regards,Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed on both points. Thanks for your input Vanamonde93, much appreciated. Terlob (talk) 21:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding persondata to articles you create, it has been deprecated since May 2015. See WP:PERSONDATA for more information. MB298 (talk) 05:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MB298: Noted - thanks for letting me know! Terlob (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In case you were curious, Bill Beggs was previously created, talking about this guy; it was A7 speedied a few days after creation. There was also apparently a William Beggs article, because it was protected in 2008 with a rationale of CSD G4, biographies of living persons concerns, OTRS/private correspondance-related, see User:Daniel/SP for more information. Please email me if you have any questions. However, the page has no deletion log, and there aren't any deleted edits; I'm not clear if the log and deleted edit got removed somehow (oversight perhaps?) or if this were merely a preëmptive deletion. Nyttend (talk) 23:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyttend:Thanks for the info - I was a bit curious as to why it would be banned globally, I'd spent a bit of time trying to find out why! I guessed it must have been a Bill/William Beggs somewhere making the same article over and over again. Terlob (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Congratulations for getting through all remaining past VFL/AFL players, incredible effort. Jevansen (talk) 06:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jevansen: Thankyou! Very much appreciated! Terlob (talk) 08:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, congrats! Never thought we'd see the day. Jenks24 (talk) 10:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going through some of the early Melbourne players and when I came across Jim McCoy I noticed he doesn't have an entry in the Holmesby & Main's Encyclopedia (9th ed). The only McCoy listed is Jack McCoy and then it just skips on to Austin McCrabb. Does your edition have an entry for Jim McCoy? Or is there some other explanation (e.g. listed under another name)? Cheers, Jenks24 (talk)

@Jenks24: Just had a look, and there's no Jim McCoy in the 10th edition either. I've looked through all the Melbourne Mc's and Mac's but can't see his game tacked on anyone else. There were probably 5 or 6 players I came across that had this problem - hopefully the 11th edition (if there is one) picks them up along the way. Terlob (talk) 07:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, that's interesting. I knew there were some discrepancies in games/goals counts between the Encyclopedia and AFL Tables/AustralianFootball, but I didn't realise there were discrepancies in terms of actual players. My copy of 125 yrs of the Melbourne Demons also has no listing for anyone called McCoy. Melbourne did recruit someone called McCoy, brother of the umpire, at the start of the season [1]. But I can't find him mentioned in any of newspaper articles discussing the match vs Fitzroy he's supposed to have played in. His brother did umpire that match though [2]. Bit of a mystery. Jenks24 (talk) 09:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jenks24:The umpire for the game he supposedly played in was a McCoy [3] - my best guess would be that somewhere along the line somebody has read McCoy on a teamsheet/scorecard and found the only McCoy in the squad at that time was Jim, and credited him with a game. There has to be a game out of order somewhere, as there are already 20 players listed for Melbourne in that particular game not including Jim. Terlob (talk) 09:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking likely that the Encyclopedia might have it right and that he never played a match. I've emailed Supermercado (Demonwiki) to see if he can shed any further light on this. Jenks24 (talk) 09:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Think I might have found another one like this. Can you find an entry for Alec Mawhinney? Jenks24 (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, disregard. He's listed under McWhinney. Jenks24 (talk) 11:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And now I've found one that really is missing: Jimmy Nolan (footballer). Jenks24 (talk) 12:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jenks - I've had a look through my copy and can't see him. Demonwiki mentions the fact he's not in the Encyclopedia, and there's a thread on BigFooty about him that says the same. Based on the info there, I think this may be the other way in that he's a real player the encyclopedia has missed. Terlob (talk) 10:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, it looks conclusive. I've emailed BAS Publishing with the correction. Jenks24 (talk) 11:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Hewett (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collingwood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill McNabb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill McNabb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) 00:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bert Lucas (footballer, born 1921) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Evan Daniel Collett 04:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bert Lucas (footballer, born 1921) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Lucas (footballer, born 1921) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Evan Daniel Collett 04:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvanDanielCollett (talk • contribs)

Hello, Terlob. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

This may seem unnecessary but I thought I would say this to you anyway, and it could be deleted later after you read this however that is of course if you were the creator of the Herb Sawatzky Wikipedia page. Anyway I only found that he had a Wikipedia page on 29 September 2017 but Herb is my Grandfather and I didn't know much about his football career until you put this Wikipedia page up so Thank You very much. Much Appreciation.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Col Anderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Col Anderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Terlob. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Ron Rolfe, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jwood (leave me a message) See what I'm up to 19:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris McAsey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris McAsey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui ^雲_水 11:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Garry Scott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet criteria for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 09:51, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Rumney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Rumney until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JTZegers^Speak
_Aura 19:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Terlob: Thank you for documenting Australian Rules footballers. Your efforts have helped my family piece together historic dates and data that were significant in the football and running life of my grandfather. Again- thank you, it means so much to us, greatly appreciated! 1.127.106.119 (talk) 09:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graham Kemp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Kemp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aspirex (talk) 23:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Freyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Freyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IncompA 01:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ray Ritchie (Australian rules footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Ritchie (Australian rules footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 08:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lindsay Ellis (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Fred Patterson (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Matt Johnson (Australian footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NAFL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]