User talk:Takometer

The mechanistic scheme should incorporate the solvent participation mechanism. For example in methanol, the carbonyl oxide undergoes attack to give an alpha-methoxyl hydroperoxide. This can be conveniently incorporated by an arrow going right in the current scheme. I lack the technical skills to do this. If you let me have the ChemDraw original, I can do the editting DavidRKelly 17:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the mechanism image- long needed! Walkerma 7 July 2005 19:20 (UTC)

Hi. I saw that you recently removed the Featured Article candidate sign from Talk:Enzyme because you didn't feel the article was good enough. While I agree with you, the procedure is to vote here on the subject instead of eliminating the candidacy. I've fixed the page, and any objections you can add on the candidacy page would help people improve the article. Enjoy your time here,

Dave (talk) 18:25, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks For the heads up on my shitty pyrophosphate, don't know how I missed it. Thanks again! It's all fixed now! Adenosine | Talk 10:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand the history correctly, you are responsible for posting the new dual image of insulin. Thank you and please thank its creator (not you if I understand correctly); it's a lovely image and very good work. It's a major contributor to the article's quality. I think it's now among the best on WP, at least the parts I see regularly. Thank you again. ww 22:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I did make this image, if you mean the one with the monomer and hexamer structures. I did not make the picture of the actual crystals, but I did make the one of the hexamer structure with zinc ions. These sorts of images are rather simple to make, with the free software pymol. Insulin's 3d coordinates were taken from the crystal nmr structure deposited in the PDB under 1ai0. Chang, X., Jorgensen, A.M., Bardrum, P., Led, J.J. --Takometer 01:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I read the history and checked image filename just to accomplish one thing: congratulate the image poster. THANK YOU! I am learning nutrition, and have no background in chemistry (I took French instead), so I'm infinitely grateful for the little explaining blurb below it. Nastajus 03:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Takometer! Will you please be so kind and move your picture to Commons, so that I can use it in the german version of Insulin. Kind Regards from Austria, Rudi PumpingRudi Now also in the en-Universe. PumpingRudi 20:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How did Programmed evolution evolve? -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 19:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article, which you seem to have written, appears to violate our Wikipedia:No original research policy. Please consult that policy, and also Wikipedia:Cite sources and revise the article accordingly - otherwise, it will be challenged. Slrubenstein | Talk 10:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... I just noticed that there's an error in the figure you made for the cyanogen bromide article. It's the peptide bond of the substrate, that has been drawn erronously. I haven't used chem drawing programs for a while, so I'm not so enthusiastic about fixing it myself... :-) Kjaergaard 05:25, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:B4p.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 17:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could respond to the question posted at Talk:Genetic code#Codon usage stats in the genetic code image about your picture of the genetic code ([1]). There seems to be a discrepancy / confusion about the codon usage bias numbers.

Is there an SVG version of this image? If it's trivial to do, you should consider uploading an SVG version since that's the preferred format for this sort of graphic.

Finally, although it's small, I think you shouldn't have a credit within the image. From Wikipedia:Image use policy#User-created images: "Always specify on the description page where the image came from (the source), such as scanning a paper copy, or a URL, or a name/alias and method of contact for the photographer. For screenshots this means what the image is a screenshot of (the more detail the better). Do not put credits in images themselves." As I understand it, it's contrary to the policy of wikipedia to claim credit for any contributions within the article itself, including images. Madeleine ✉ ✍ 21:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm taking it off. I've had pictures I've made stolen off of wikipedia frequently, this one was too important for me to just let go. I wasn't aware of the credit issue. I refuse to take my name off this particular image, it was too much work, simple. Takometer (talk) 03:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry the implications of the creative commons licensing weren't clear to you - images used on wikipedia must be released under with a copyright that allows reuse, modification, and commercial usage. I appreciate your intent to contribute and I understand that it's sometimes not worth giving up ownership. The image did look like a lot of work. :) Madeleine

✉ ✍ 22:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madeleine Price Ball (talk • contribs) [reply]

Uhm, I DO understand what the CC licence means, when I say "stolen" I mean reused WITHOUT CREDIT. I don't care if people copy it, so long as my name appears on it. Imprinting my name in the raster image was a (admittedly non-foolproof) way to ensure that the CC licence was honored. When the crediting information appears on the Image page, it is sufficiently decoupled from the image that a "right click/save as" does not preserve the crediting information. Sorry, I just don't have enough trust in people to not abuse and honor that. Most people, however, will not go to the trouble of removing the name from the raster image.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Programmed evolution, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Brainsik (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

on the genetic code talk page before the figure being discussed is inserted. Doug youvan (talk) 02:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the recent undo: Those really are the properties that K&D deduced from experimental values "inside" proteins. There are exceptions, such a the protonated glutamic acid at E104 in the photosynthetic reaction center. Mutation EL104L did not cause bisymmetric electron transfer, and that residue is particularly well-studied by spectroscopists. Also, I don't know if I can find the reference, but the K-D scale can be reduced from its current fine scale (~ -4.5 to +4.5) to a very coarse scale (-1, 0, 1) and it still predicts transmembrane protein domains just fine. Doug youvan (talk) 16:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there...

I am going through a number of images that have some minor licensing issues. I came across Image:Staudinger.png which you uploaded. The licensing on this image is not complete as it was uploaded many years ago. I wonder if you could follow the link to the image page and correct the licensing with a GFDL license (or other free license). If you have any questions or issues, please drop me a note on my talk page. Thanks. --Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Staudinger.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 20:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:15sigmatropic.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:25Aug09anthra.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:25Aug09anthra.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LDA.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ninhydrin.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Beckman-night.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Islet.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Crossbeta.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]