User talk:SovalValtos

Archives

2018/November 2018/December 2019/January 2019/February 2019/March 2019/May 2019/June 2019/July 2019/August 2019/October 2019/November 2020/February 2020/April 2020/July 2020/December 2021/March 2021/April 2022/March 2022/November 2023/January 2023/February 2023/August 2023/November 2023/December 2024/June

This page has archives. Sections older than 25 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Archives

Index 1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 25 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 10 sections are present.

To the user, Yes I would consider myself hypocritical now (I did change that picture of the cityscape, sorry for that) for changing that picture. But I Changed and lets discuss about it first. Sertyt (talk) 11:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actually I wont mind one picture in the infobox of that cityscape one.

It think remobve khandigiri and udaygiri caves. Sertyt (talk) 11:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sertyt. Please use the article's talk page to discuss its content.SovalValtos (talk) 11:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SovalValtos, I'm spamming everyone from the Portsmouth meetup last year. I'm hosting a meetup in Brighton on 3 February 2024 if you're interested. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HJ Mitchell sorry I cannot make it. The three week cough has turned into a five week cough. Best wishes to all.SovalValtos (talk) 12:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Harris (singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you reverted my addition of an IPA pronunciaton for Ponterwyd. I am a Welsh-speaker and have an academic background in linguistics. I can assure you that the IPA I have provided is correct. Moreover, what source would you ideally want? There aren't any Welsh-language pronunciation dictionaries because the orthography is almost entirely phonemic. 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:B0C7:6A2B:FF25:DB4F (talk) 19:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is required for such an addition is a reliable source WP:RS. The fruits of original research WP:OR even with an editor's assurances that they are correct are not acceptable whatever the editor's background.SovalValtos (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not 'original research'. I don't think you know very much about this matter.

I shall try to put it simply: in Welsh, a single letter (including digraphs) has a single pronunciation. It is entirely regular. So regular that the there are not pronunciation guides or dictionaries in Welsh. The only 'sources' that could be furnished would presumably be English guidebooks that happen to include an IPA transcription of the Welsh name in question.

I get the feeling that you do not much about the Welsh language or IPA? 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:B0C7:6A2B:FF25:DB4F (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:B0C7:6A2B:FF25:DB4F or I know about the Welsh language or IPA is irrelevant. I see that you have made IPA additions and then 'corrected' them. How do we know which 'correct' version or 'uncorrected' version of yours in articles are correct unless you give a source which verifies what you have added, see Wikipedia:Verifiability. There is no requirement to include an IPA transcription in English Wikipedia of Welsh pronunciations so if a source is not available leave it alone. You can always publish the fruits of your research work elsewhere. Incidentally, the edit summary is for a description of what you have done; use talk for explanations etc. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 01:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If that is so, then almost every IPA transcription for placenames on the English Wikipedia would have to be removed, as almost all of them are unsourced. The reasoning, I imagine, is likewise that those names have a standard pronunciation in the language it came from, especially, such as in the case of Italian and Welsh amd Finnish and so forth, when the language has a phonemic orthography. There is therefore nothing to source: what do you want, a link to an academic work which notes the correspondence between letters and sounds in Welsh? 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:BC5A:2F4E:F7D6:1E3F (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop reverting my additions of IPA pronunciation? As already noted, it is my background, and morevoer, Welsh orthography is phonemic, so there aren't many sources for pronunciations because the relationship between what is written and what is said is transparent. In fact, you only tend to find soures for when this is not the case, regarding those rare exceptions. 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:B0C7:6A2B:FF25:DB4F (talk) 19:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reasons not entirely clear, you seem to spend a lot of time tagging IPA transcriptions of Welsh-language placenames as needing a citation. The reason that the overwhelming majority of such instances on Wikipedia are unsourced is that Welsh orthography is phonemic. You could similarly waste your time in tagging all IPA transcriptions for Italian placenames as needing a citation, although the reason for their lack of citation is that Italian orthography is also phonemic. As with Welsh, the standard pronunciation is therefore self-evident. They'd only really need a citation if they were contrary to the standard, regular and transparent pattern.

For consistency, why don't you busy yourself by tagging IPA transcriptions of English-language placenames as needing citations, seeing as the vast majority of them don't have this? Otherwise one might come to conlusion that you, who I presume are English, have a strange vindictive obsession with the Welsh language? 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:2D99:5CAE:E071:6F48 (talk) 20:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:2D99:5CAE:E071:6F48 IPA transcriptions that I have tagged as needing a citation include those which good faith editors differ, both perhaps giving what they consider as being self-evident. Readers have no reason to prefer the work of one editor over another, even if one says they are Welsh-speaker and have an academic background in linguistics, unless their version is supported by a WP:RS. Might you consider opening an account? I am not interested in your speculation, presumptions or possible conclusions. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 15:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales#English-language pronunciations on these edits, if you're interested, although the discussion slowed down. DankJae 16:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SovalValtos, please do clarify the concern with the updates I've made regards WP:EL in case I've not realised a violation of some sort. The links in question are YouTube content which in itself isn't explicitly barred. I have no conflict of interest with the creator having never met them and being here long before their channel, the content does relate directly to the articles (I'm sure you'll have visited them), I genuinely think the series helps to showcase sometimes small geographical settlements which have little other exposure, and without saying it visually compliments the highly prose-based articles here. Regards, 15:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC) The Equalizer (talk) 15:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Equalizer Are you sure the links comply with Wikipedia:External links content guidelines? In particular WP:YOUTUBE, WP:COPYVIOEL and copyright music as well as copyright video contained in a YouYube posting are us linkers responsibility. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 21:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I can't guarantee completely. I saw the content is using YouTube library music, but on delving deeper I see mention that the vids may use other YouTube video music. It's a minefield so safest to remove. Cheers for pointing it out. The Equalizer (talk) 23:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cheltenham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Town Hall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on "staying the course" for 10 years. Well done. It has been a pleasure editing with you. Best wishes, Tony. Tony Holkham (Talk) 16:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tony for your kind words and moderating influence.SovalValtos (talk) 20:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rodric Williams, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 06:45, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SV. Hope all is well with you. I've forgotten how to align the commons category box to the left, and can't find an article where it is that way. Can you advise? Thanks, Tony. Tony Holkham (Talk) 11:39, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, first of all, thanks for the cool photos you've uploaded to Commons over the years. Regarding this one from 2016, I removed it (diff) from Warlock's article for the reasons I mention in the edit summary. Does it make sense to you, or am I missing something? Cheers — Gor1995 𝄞 17:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gor1995 I have found the photocopy of the plan of the Eastern portion of Nightingale cemetery that I got from the council offices in 2016. It was annotated by hand by them with the locations of the three plots I was interested in; Julius Caesar, Jack Philips and Heseltine. 2417 {sic) is what they gave for Warlock. I never saw the register of the burial records of the cemetery, have you? It is possible they transposed numbers particularly as Julius Caesar was 2217, the one they wrote above 2417. My photocopy is sufficiently clearer than the online version [1] that with a microscope I might be able to read the numbers. However a link to a non-free image would be good in any attempt to find the correct grave. A quick search came up with Ohio! I MIGHT be able to re-visit to correct the error. Best wishes SovalValtos (talk) 23:24, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering! So cool that they gave you that map... yeah, i hope that your map is sharper than the online version because i can't see anything there haha. For a link of a non-free image you can see List of burial places of classical musicians (which is why i initially got interested in his grave) or his memorial in Find a Grave. You can see that Find a Grave indicates his plot number is 2147. It is also the same number that appears in the burial records of the cemetery (link, Warlock's entry is number N7/5262, page 65). It would be fantastic if you could visit that spot and take pictures, it's a beautiful way to honor his enduring legacy in music. Best wishes — Gor1995 𝄞 08:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gor1995 The microscope and an ordinary magnifying glass were enough to find that with magnification in-between I should be able to read some of the plot numbers. However one of the additional images in Find a Grave [2] should give enough to locate the plot on foot with the copy I have printed. Are there any more musicians there?SovalValtos (talk) 11:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! No, i don't think there are any more famous people in that cemetery. — Gor1995 𝄞 23:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful when reverting a talk page comment. I was quoting an unclear sentence in the article and asking for clarification. NOTAFORUM is completely inapplicable.—Chowbok ☠ 22:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reading the source or tagging the article if you User:Chowbok don't understand text and want it explained might be a better route. Best wishes.SovalValtos (talk) 23:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]