User talk:Smith609

This user is not currently active on Wikipedia. Smith609 has not edited Wikipedia since 9 January 2024. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This user rarely has the opportunity to spend time on Wikipedia, so may not respond immediately to comments posted here, and is unlikely to see comments posted elsewhere. If urgent input is required, try e-mailing.

Because I have little time to edit Wikipedia, if there one of my edits needs copyediting and you are not able to perform this task yourself, the best thing to do is to tag the offending article with Template:Cleanup, leaving a note on its talk page if required. As I watch pages I edit, this means that I or other editors will be able to fix errors as necessary.

Please note: to avoid duplication, I'll reply to queries on this page.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

/DOI bot

I have some good images ×10 of lichenns that I captured on my olive trees today but I don't know how to propose them.to the author. I found your name at the beginning of lichens article. Ivanmellace (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Around 10 years ago, you created Taxobot and registered it on Toolforge. It appears to be inactive.

In 2021, Taxobot was created on the French Wikipedia (Github). We would like to attempt deploying that tool on Toolforge under its original name. Since your Taxobot is still registered, albeit inactive, would you be open to rename / delete it on Toolforge to free up the URL for this project?

Thank you. LD (talk) 10:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

🐲🐉 GinnyThomas (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating User:Citation bot 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 00:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I reverted you recent edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic. Your edit was badly formatted, and unencyclopedic. If you feel the given formula is incorrect, I encourage you to discuss this issue on the article's talk page. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 06:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the talk page already indicates that the forumla is incorrect. I've restored the edit in a more "encyclopaedic" format – if you feel you can improve the formatting, do please feel free to do so, but I think it's worth keeping the reference in there as in my view, it's better to have badly formatted but correct information than formulae that are perfectly formatted but with no indication that they are misleading! Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 09:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tremendous. Outstanding. 2800:BF0:155:E19:D75:1D68:E8FE:562A (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:-ve range has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Great appendage has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 6 § Great appendage until a consensus is reached. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 09:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]