User talk:RandomUserGuy1738

Hello, I'm WNYY98. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ronna Romney McDaniel without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WNYY98 (talk) 04:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Ronna Romney McDaniel. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing images of people on Wikipedia to ones of poor quality. Jonathunder (talk) 22:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colorado gubernatorial election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marquardtika (talk) 06:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Andy Cook (Indiana politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.westfield.in.gov/department/?structureid=121. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jennifer McCormick, RandomUserGuy1738!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Some of the text here is copy/pasted from Ballotpedia] which is licensed under a GNU Free Documentation License. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Andrew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Kernan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GRuban was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The only source is an opinion piece. The relevant criterion is WP:CRYSTAL - for us to write an article about a future election, we need considerably more and more reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indianapolis mayoral election of 2019 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Indianapolis mayoral election of 2019, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GRuban (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GRuban (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Clere, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgetown, Indiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of mayors of Noblesville, Indiana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information Also, not sourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rklawton (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of mayors of Noblesville, Indiana, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

John from Idegon (talk) 22:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of mayors of Carmel, Indiana, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

John from Idegon (talk) 22:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Heath VanNatter, RandomUserGuy1738!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add relevant wikiprojects to the talk pages of articles you create.

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 07:51, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RandomUserGuy1738! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I’m inviting you to join other people who edit conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can ask questions and meet new colleagues. You'll also discover DYK: the easiest and funnest way to get your article on the Main Page. I hope to see you there! – Lionel^(talk) 11:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. RandomUserGuy1738, thanks for creating List of mayors of West Lafayette, Indiana!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of mayors of West Lafayette, Indiana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mayors of West Lafayette, Indiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nate • (chatter) 15:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. RandomUserGuy1738, thanks for creating P. Eric Turner!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please clean up the naked URLs. For more information see WP:CITE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Ditslear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 20:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Ditslear is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Ditslear until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 07:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your additions to Russell Fagg. I was having a hard time finding sourcing on his time in the Montana House so I'm glad you were able to! Marquardtika (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russell Fagg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page District Judge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I recently moved an article you created to Draft:Michael Cloud (texas politician).--SamHolt6 (talk) 01:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Phillip E. Gutman, RandomUserGuy1738!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please address the naked URLs in the sources. For more informatrion see WP:CITE

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:04, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rick Pate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Being the mayor of a small town and candidate for state cabinet is not presumed to meet the criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 20:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attempt to contribute to the Paul Manafort wiki page. However it's best if you vote on a topic that is under discussion instead of making unilateral edits with yet another subpar image. AlexOvShaolin 02:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to let you know users are repeatedly violating WP:MUG on the Paul Manafort page. For some reason they continue to remove the image you added in place of a mugshot. BOLO 97 (talk) 08:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indianapolis mayoral election of 2019".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 22:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Cloud".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:56, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you create bolded paragraph headers for 'committee assignments' sections rather than "Sub-section 1" headers? The table of contents looks nicer without 'committee assignments' and 'caucus membership'. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

However, each item in the list should not be bolded as RandomUserGuy1738 did here.- MrX 🖋 15:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I should have been clearer. What I had in mind was something along these lines:[1] Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Pierce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baron Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lee County Sheriff's Office (Florida). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Follow BRD John from Idegon (talk) 12:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a ruling somewhere on the use of "Judge" rather than "United States District Judge" for federal district court judges? Federal style guide is "United States District Judge"

Hello. Re this edit, please do not link New York City, per MOS:OVERLINK. I will fix this instance. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 15:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Megyn Kelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt Caldwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Horner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your recent edits to Florida legislator pages. I noticed that you've been editing legislator term dates to either the year following their election, or the date of the organizing session that happens in late November two weeks after the election. In Florida, legislators take office upon election (Art. III, Sec. 15(d) of the Constitution), so term dates should begin and end on the dates of election. Thanks! Starrfruit (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great photo of Ted Stevens, but I couldn't tell if it was public domain. Activist (talk) 01:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that at Soviet Union, you edited the link to a photo to be a link to the same photo, but with a different filename. (With the edit summary "Better quality image".) So I looked at your contrib page and I see that you have been doing a lot of that. For instance, I see that at Ronald Reagan, you did the same thing. What gives? Bruce leverett (talk) 01:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Potentially notable but needs the detailed information about how and when she ran for office, her platforms, election results in primary and general election.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michelle Salzman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michelle Salzman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Salzman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738

Thank you for creating Barry Richard.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating, remember to always try and not use bare URLs. See WP:CITE.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 July 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mike Enzi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 16:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see that you have checked on the Lee Zeldin article every so often. I would kindly invite you to participate in the current discussion about the article structure on the talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lee_Zeldin#Article_Structure Cheers, Capisred (talk) 02:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your your edits to Neil David Levin, had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. As I'm sure you know by now, since you're a veteran editor, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation. This includes the Infobox, succession boxes, etc. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I added the information from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_York_State_Banking_Department&oldid=1077998694 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Pataki#Governorship_and_political_positions. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 16:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mayor of Waterbury, Connecticut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the body of an article before adding citations to the article's lede paragraph(s). Citations in the lede are not appropriate when the body of the paragraph supports the facts given in the lede. Moreover, please properly cite your sources when you can instead of just using a single URL. Muttnik talk 19:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article James Zagel, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 19:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have a simple question to ask, how did you get a high quality version of this image from getty without the watermark?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/86/Richard_Nixon_In_1960.jpg KlaudeMan (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RandomUserGuy1738. Please discuss your decision to add responses here on the talk page for the 2024 shooting at a Donald Trump rally. It is currently being debated, as it will likely become outdated very quickly, and turn into a pain to edit later if we add reactions from every politician. Ornov Ganguly (talk) 01:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've recently been interested in starting pages for new member of the Florida Legislature. I noticed you uploaded the photo to Debbie Mayfield. I was wondering how you got the photo in such high definition. When I go to the site, it's a small and blurry image. Any help and advice is greatly appreciated! ZebulonMorn (talk) 07:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]