User talk:Peppage

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Peppage}} on your talk.

Archives

Archive 1

You helped me out with getting the article cleaned up, so I figured you'd be a good place to turn. There's an edit war going on involving part of the campus history. If you could come to the Talk page and throw in your two cents, it'd be appreciated. Thanks!  RasputinAXP  14:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up as well as taking time to review other editor's contributions. For the example you provided, I'd classify that as a start (the absolute minimum for a start though). Since we adopted the C-class, I've been more lenient in determining if an article should be upgraded to start. Usually though, I try to make sure there are at least four sections of information (but if three are well-developed) then that's okay. We don't need to worry too much about these lower classes, it's the higher ones that we should focus on (fortunately the majority of the Start-class articles have already been reviewed). --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for offering to help, I appreciate it. I've actually been doing the newsletter for a few years now, but I always welcome others who like to help out with the newsletter, so if you're interested feel free to start adding to it. I just started this month's, and I won't be able to edit it until I get home from work. If you want to get it started, I'd appreciate it. Let me know if you have any questions, and I'll get back to you later tonight. Thanks again! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 14:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You helped quite a bit and saved me a lot of time. I'll welcome any other assistance you can provide for future issues if you're still interested. The DYKs can be found here. I just search by "film" and grab most of them. I definitely need to start initiating the newsletter page earlier in the month so more of the core elements that don't really change can be completed so only limited time needs to be spent on the last day's updates. Anyway, thanks again! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy tag. It's already been declined previously.[1] At worst this should be redirect to Hilary Lawson. The edit history[2] indicates that material may have been removed which was valid. I've restored some of it, and put some on the talk page for review. Ty 18:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		WP:FILM Barnstar
		This is to acknowledge and thank you for your participation in tagging and assessing 2,400 articles in WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive 2009-2010. You have helped to ensure our project has a better idea of the articles under our scope. I appreciate your efforts in further helping the project! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		WP:FILM Bronze Wiki
		Additional thanks go to your efforts as you reviewed the third most amount of articles during the drive. This is a great feat, and I do thank you for taking the time to review so many articles. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for going over and cleaning up the admittedly junky prose in The Killer article. It's greatly appreciated! :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! I hope it will pass its GAN. Improving film articles is important. --Peppage^tlk 18:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to say I've mentioned your name here. MickMacNee (talk) 12:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Peppage. Did you get my message before? You can review it here. I'm wondering if there is anything that can be done on the WikiProject's part to help facilitate the bot requests. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bovineboy had updated the page after you posted a response to clear it up. I actually have been focused on getting the infobox fixes perfect and making sure there are no errors. I've been testing it and it works well. Right now if the article has an infobox the bot cleans and standardizes it, it also will try and fill in some missing information. I just created a repository https://bitbucket.org/peppage/filmbot/ (something I should have done awhile ago) if you wanted to see it. It's going to need more testing and I wanted to work on a way to give an infobox to articles that needed it. --Peppage^tlk 18:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is really cool! I wish I could do something like that. :) Anyway, thanks for the update. No major rush; these many changes, we should be getting it right. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good job in cutting the plot summary down to size. I've attempted this a number of times already, but people keep putting irrelevant details back in. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think it's going to get a lot worse. I still don't like the part at the end which talks about how the movie is shown and does not read like the rest of the plot. --Peppage^tlk 15:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peppage,

Thanks for doing some minor cleanup and adding external links in many of the Japanese film pages that I have created. I really appreciate this as usually, I am the only one who maintains these huge numbers of articles, and I am sometimes overwhelmed by it (as you can see, the articles' qualities differs quite a lot). As such, your work is really helpful to me. Hope to work with you again in the future! --Lionratz (talk) 01:36, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added the poster - image. The eye is also a poster image. The film will be in Cyprus next week -- last week it was shown in 14,000 monitors in Seoul, Korea's underground. http://www.cyprusfilmfestival.org/cyiff/index.php?option=com_sobi2&sobi2Task=sobi2Details&catid=39&sobi2Id=227&Itemid=9999Mig (talk) 06:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

I have been waiting for the copyright number for about seven months or more. There will be an article about me, the film and the banks (Take over Wallstreet?) on the Hugffington Post soon, as I will be interviewed tomorrow. I believe that this short is very current with what's happening in the country -- even the world. I thank you for your contribution and Wikipedia comments. Just so that you know, the film has been programmed or will be exhibited in the following festivals -- as you know, these festivals see thousands of films before a selection is made, so getting exhibited is and of itself an honor.

anonymous (street meat) - UCLA/Ciboney productions. Exhibited:

California International Short Film Festival “Honorable Mention” Santa Monica, CA USA 2011

Daazo European SF Centre, Hungary 2011

Ibergente, Quito, Ecuador 2011

Famewalk International Short Film Festival, “Nomination,” California, USA 2011

Cannes Festival de Film SFC, France 2011

Seoul Metro International Extreme Image & Film Festival, SESIFF “Going Underground” South Korea 14,321 monitors (est. 3.6 million viewers) 2011

Berliner Fenster , Berlin Metro International Film Festival “Going Underground” Germany - 2800 monitors (est. 3 million viewers) 2011

Cyprus International Film Festival, Nicosia, Cyprus 2011

Burbank International Film Festival (BIFF) - AMC Theater Women’s Night Block One, California, USA 2011

X-Open Saint Petersburg, Russia, Film Festival “Beginning” 2011

In the Palace International Film Festival, Balchik, Bulgaria 2011

Early Melons International Student Film Festival, Bratislava, Slovakia 2011

Le VII European Independent Film Festival (ÉCU) - France, Italy, Spain, UK 2011

Indie Lisboa International Independent Film Festival, Portugal 2011

East Silver Market, Prague, Czech Republic 2011

Ffresh — the Student Moving Image Festival of Wales, Wales 2011

International Festival of Kinoproba Russia Lunacharskogo, Russia 2011

Watersprite Cambridge International Student Film Festival, UK 2011

International festival of short films and visual art WIZ-ART, Russia 2011

Digital Film Festival Izolenta, Sweden 2011

busho Budapest Short Film Festival, Hungary 2011

Miradox Portal, Russia 2011

Breaking Ground European Film Festival, The Netherlands 2011

Mig (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peppage, why are you editing film articles where you remove infobox fields and add others and mark these edits as minor? For example, here, I don't know why you're removing the "alt" field (we wanted to add it where it does not exist, not the other way around), and you're adding writing-related fields when they were not part of the critical set of parameters to include. (For that film, the "screenplay" field is sufficient, so the new fields are going to be unused.) Erik (talk | contribs) 17:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CinemaBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 11:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 12:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the helping hand! :) Erik (talk | contribs) 15:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for all your contributions identifying articles for WikiProject Film! Not to mention CinemaBot! :) Erik (talk | contribs) 14:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing these from film infoboxes. They are there because the title on its own is too long for the template to handle the automatic italicization of the page title. Gokaiger Goseiger Super Sentai 199 Hero Great Battle, Kamen Rider OOO Wonderful: The Shogun and the 21 Core Medals, and Kamen Rider × Kamen Rider Fourze & OOO: Movie War Mega Max are all too long for this feature to work.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down. I was mistaken in my edits, I didn't know about these special instances because I missed the box at the top of Template:Infobox film explaining the situation. It is a very particular parameter not normally used. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. :) --Peppage^tlk 20:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pretty blatant box, though. Just keep this in mind for the future.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for the welcome!

Are you a coordinator for the project? The reason I ask is that I am the coordinator for the Firearms project and Cutlery (knives and swords) project on here. Although we coordinate semiregularly with the military history people, I'd like to work with the film project more on future articles about guns and knives in movies. While I don't want to see every gun article list every movie a particular gun has been in, there are a few guns and knives that have become somewhat iconic because of their appearance in a film: Rambo's knives, Conan's swords, Dirty Harry's Smith & Wesson Model 29, Quigley's Sharps rifle, etc. Can you point me in the right direction on this?--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 18:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a coordinator but Erik (lead), MichaelQSchmidt, Bovineboy2008, MikeAllen, Karthikndr are the newly elected coordinators. Any one of them should be able to help you out, although Erik seems to be missing right now. A collaboration sounds like a great idea though. --Peppage^tlk 19:14, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In this edit, you removed the </source> tag. Please don't do that; it breaks the bot. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:36, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for any grief this has brought you. It was my first time using your bot, I just wanted to get the newsletter out. I'm not the person that normally does it but he went completely MIA. I was trying to be very careful but I overlooked that tag. It won't happen again. --Peppage^tlk 22:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit form my talk page: "Hey! You have done some great editing on Toward the Unknown. In the cast section tables are not typically be used per MOS:FILM#Cast. Happy Editing! --Peppage^ಠ_ಠ 00:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)"[reply]

Hi Peppage, thanks for the note. I do know that tables are considered improper form for the cast list, but it is often a useful graphic device to take up the inevitable "white space" that is created. Eons ago, tables were perfectly acceptable but a group of editors did take a stand against their use in wiki film articles, and that decision was incorporated in the MOS. One of the reasons why I eventually left as a film project group coordinator was the constant snipping that was becoming prevalent and the deletion of tables was one of the sticky points where a small but active group of editors could dictate a change merely because it followed the WP:I just don't like it precept. FWiW, I still have never heard the reason for why tables on a cast list were "poor" form ... Bzuk (talk) 04:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

That was before my time, it's not organizing data and it is a list of names. I follow the MOS because that was the consensus. I've recently come across some people that didn't even know the MOS was there so I was trying to spread the word. --Peppage^ಠ_ಠ 04:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus is when all parties agree to a decision or resolution, I was one of the holdouts but the MOS proceeded with basically a small number voting one way. Regardless, when anyone complains, I do change the format, but it does make sense not to have great big gaping holes in the articles which cast lists invariably create. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 05:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Inre this diff

I'm finding talk pages. What would you like done? Ask, and I'll do so/ Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. I was able to overwrite the cross-mainspace redirects in order to make the proper moves to all but Kill Bill. In looking for a talk page for Kill Bill Volume 2, I found Talk:Kill Bill Vol. 2 So check in with the guy who may better know where all the CNR's for this title are hidden: User:Anthony Appleyard. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further investigation, it seems to have been just as you surmised... a talk page left behind after an agreed-upon page move. Per your thoughts on Talk:WikiProject Film, I performed the move. However, I did leave a redirect from "Talk:Vol.2" to "Talk:Volume 2" as a reasonable search term of the article title itself. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The rating you did for Keshu seems to be totally incorrect. The article definitely is not Stub class. I observed other film articles also where you have simply crated talk pages with incorrect or ignorant ratings. Please make better and correct ratings as per guidelines or let the experienced Wikipedians do the rating.
Anish Viswa 07:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You mad bro? Straight from The Film Assessment department:

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Film WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.

If you wanted to assess them, you're allowed. It's not a personal attack against you, I just rated against the criteria with my opinion. For that specific article I would have liked to see another section that wasn't an accolade list. You can even use these instructions to give a basis on rating. That said, I could probably be more lenient on ratings but the Category:Unassessed film articles isn't going to rate itself and it's my opinion. --Peppage^ಠ_ಠ 14:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen many articles with lesser mount of data and very few references assessed in Start class. Keshu definitely has more information than as Stub class artaicle. Just compare the examples given for Stub class article and Start class article and also visit some pages rated as Stub class and Start class. I am also not attacking you personally, but I am observing that the ratings you are giving to articles and more than what even 'subjective' can justify.
Anish Viswa 14:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not basing my ratings on other articles, just on the guidelines. I don't know what you want me to say. Do you really want someone who is actively trying to help WP:FILM to stop editing? The article rating is internal anyway, if you disagree just change it. --Peppage^ಠ_ಠ 14:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are all trying to help and contribute to WP:FILM. As the author of the article, I don't want myself to rate or re-rate the article. What I am only telling is to compare the articles to rate with the examples given there for articles rating, while you rate articles.
Anish Viswa 15:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Wolf Boy by --Sunuraju (talk) 10:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Endure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Arnold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peppage!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Countdown2011Poster.jpg, but in order to keep new images, we need to know their exact source and copyright status.

If you can edit the description page and add that information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

we need pic of Lee Ji-ah by --Sunuraju (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Love 911 by --Sunuraju (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your work on adding film posters. But the image you placed at Lipsett Diaries is for an entirely different film, Life Express. 14:44, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Possible Worlds (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean McCann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

Hi. As a past contributor to this article, do you have any thoughts on the question I have posed on the Talk page? Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 16:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Doc savage the man of bronze dvd cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DisneyShotKennedy2010Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adjusting the levels and cutting out some of the silent gaps in my recording. It's much better now. Appreciate it!

Shayday~enwiki (talk) 12:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AnnaBoleyn1920Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:47Ronin1994Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MannequinInRed1958Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]