User talk:POSEIDON OF GREECE

Hi POSEIDON OF GREECE! I noticed your contributions to Athens and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 13:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Swadge2. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Machai, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Swadge2 (talk) 05:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shivkar Bapuji Talpade, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 20:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually sir, I have a very good source. That is, A book know as 'Safari', a monthly published book by Harshal Publication, in India. Issue 88. On page 4-5,Titled as 'Past perfect, future tense'. This safari magazine, is published by a father-son duo, who currently the best publishers in the whole country. And they even write about how they got that information. My written edits are not sourceless. -POSEIDON OF GREECE POSEIDON OF GREECE (talk) 05:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I say that you didn't have a source? Who is the author of your source? And can you cite any other sources that use your sources? See WP:UNDUE. Doug Weller talk 06:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course sir, I am actually from India. The authors, are, as I said, a father-son duo, named Nagendra and Harshal sir respectively. They are running an established organisation and publication, with licenses of Indian government for research in places not allowed to be visited and only the authorized can see. They then some of the information, which is allowed to be revealed to the public, to be printed in their books. I have myself met them face to face a few times, a pair of jolly faces, with hoards of precious informative papers. POSEIDON OF GREECE (talk) 07:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I visited city libraries, for I am myself in a small research of my own, on the 'Vimana Parva', an ancient Hindu book referring to Indian knowledge of all rocket science even NASA does not have. But it is just a lore, and research in that field is required. This is the very book, along with the Vaimānika Shāstra, which gave Shivkar Bapuji Talpade the idea of making an aircraft. POSEIDON OF GREECE (talk) 07:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, for more information, read the Hinddu epic Mahabharata, and you will get what I am talking about POSEIDON OF GREECE (talk) 07:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and sir, one final favour, I do not know how to publish source. So, can you publish it on my behalf. I will get you those exact sources by tomorrow. Thank you sir POSEIDON OF GREECE (talk) 07:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two major problems. Sources would have to discuss Talpade, so can't be before the claim for his flight. Thus we don't really have to argue about whether the Vimana Parva is authentic or not (it's not, Doyle made it up). The Vaimānika Shāstra first published in 1952, isn't a reliable source, it's nonsense. See [1] and [2]. The authors of your source may be very nice, but we can't use any of this. We have a noticeboard at WP:RSN where you can challenge me, but I can assure you that Wikipedia, which is a mainstream encyclopedia, won't accept them. Doug Weller talk 10:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have two things to say. Doyle did not make it up. He found it. It is nothing to be surprised, but, it is real and authentic. It is actually chronology of emperor Ashokvardhan Maurya Piyadasi. Though, may be exaggerated, but it is not fiction. Secondly sir, I was actually just reading the article when your email came. It is actually one of the source talking about exactly what I had mentioned in my publish. Thank you sir

POSEIDON OF GREECE (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, a third thing, that is, sir, in modern day science, Vaimānika Shāstra may look nonsense, and may appear like Star Wars fiction. But sir, if you have ever been to India, you will find it is not just a book full of nonsense. All Shāstras of Ancient India had a meaning deeper within. And if you have read Doyle, then you must have read the line. Inside a sea of Maya, is an island of satya. This line he has not made, but has adapted the line by a great Indian mythologist, Devdutt Pattanaik, a man who talks true philosophy hidden in those texts, arguably better than Aristotle's, though not literally. POSEIDON OF GREECE (talk) 10:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]