[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:LuanaTKD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Universe (journal) (January 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Martin Urbanec was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LuanaTKD! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Universe (journal)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, LuanaTKD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Universe (journal), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Universe (journal) has been accepted

[edit]
Universe (journal), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lorenzo Iorio draft

[edit]

Lorenzo Iorio, born in Bari, Italy, in 1971, is an Italian physicist working in general relativity, gravitation and related topics in astronomy and astrophysics.

He is editor-in-chief[1] of the peer-reviewed scientific journal Universe]] , published by MDPI, which lists the Nobel laureates Roger Penrose and George F. Smoot in its board.

Bibliometric information

[edit]

Iorio has published so far over 230 peer-reviewed papers and 1 edited book. According to Google Scholar Citations program, his h-index is currently 43. As of April 2022, NASA ADS returns a h-index equal to[2] 42, while the tori[3] index and the riq[3] index are 137.9 and 489, respectively. As of April 2022, according to Google Scholar Citations, his most cited papers are an article[4] on Solar system constraints on f(T) gravity with 198 citations, a review[5] on the phenomenology of the Lense-Thirring effect in the Solar System with 190 citations, an editorial[6] for a Special Issue on the 100th anniversary of general relativity with 95 citations, a review[7] on possible gravitational anomalies in the Solar System with 87 citations, a paper[8] on perturbed stellar motions around the rotating black hole in Sagittarius A* for a generic orientation of its spin axis with 80 citations, and an article[9] on the impact of the static part of the Earth's gravity field on some tests of General Relativity with Satellite Laser Ranging with 80 citations.

[edit]

July 2021

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Universe (journal), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DGG ( talk ) 01:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you seem to have missed the last time I asked this, but what is your conflict of interest in regards to Lorenzo Iorio? How do you know him, or are you Mr. Iorio? - Adolphus79 (talk) 07:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, frankly speaking, I did not remember you asked me. By the way, I am a relative of him, and I am a student in physics. Regards. LuanaTKD (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This does count as a conflict of interest, though not a paid conflict of interest. You need to declare it on the talk page of your articles and drafts, and submit new articles using AfC, not directly. You also need to declare the coi on your suser page. DGG ( talk ) 10:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

=Iorio

[edit]

The material on Iorio seems at the moment to be a section of your usertalk page. The best thing to do would be to start it again as an AfC. Remember to include a list of the5 or 6 most cited peer reviewed publication, with citation counts form Google Scholar. .Let me know when ready. DGG ( talk ) 10:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. What is an AfC? Sorry, but I am not acquainted with all of that. Ok for the citations, but why from Google Scholar instead of SAO NASA ADS, which is more trustable? Thank you. LuanaTKD (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I added the citations you requested. Can you, please, help me continuing the road to publication of this article? Thank you very much. LuanaTKD (talk) 15:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
you can get references from anywhere, but the citation counts from Google Scholar work across all fields , which is convenient when any of the work is inter disclipary, which some of this is. You will have to learn yourself how to write the article, though: see WP:FIRST. DGG ( talk ) 17:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I prepared my article through AfC and submitted it for review as Iorio, Lorenzo. I was not allowed to create it as Lorenzo Iorio. Please, follow this issue and help me. Thank you. LuanaTKD (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lorenzo Iorio has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lorenzo Iorio. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 00:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lorenzo Iorio has been accepted

[edit]
Lorenzo Iorio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "Editorial Board of Universe" (webpage by MDPI). Retrieved 22 July 2021.
  2. ^ "Lorenzo Iorio publications". NASA ADS. Retrieved 2022-04-19.
  3. ^ a b Pepe, Alberto; Kurtz, Michael J. (November 2012). "A Measure of Total Research Impact Independent of Time and Discipline". PLoS ONE. 7 (11): e46428. arXiv:1209.2124. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...746428P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046428. PMC 3492370. PMID 23144782. e46428.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  4. ^ Iorio, Lorenzo; Saridakis, Emmanuel N. (December 2012). "Solar system constraints on f(T) gravity". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 427 (2): 1555–1561. arXiv:1203.5781. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.427.1555I. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21995.x.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  5. ^ Iorio, Lorenzo; Lichtenegger, Herbert I. M.; Ruggiero, Matteo L.; Corda, Christian (February 2011). "Phenomenology of the Lense-Thirring effect in the solar system". Astrophysics and Space Science. 331 (2): 351–395. arXiv:1009.3225. Bibcode:2011Ap&SS.331..351I. doi:10.1007/s10509-010-0489-5.
  6. ^ Iorio, Lorenzo (April 2015). "Editorial for the Special Issue 100 Years of Chronogeometrodynamics: The Status of the Einstein's Theory of Gravitation in Its Centennial Year". Universe (journal). 1 (1): 38-81. arXiv:1504.05789. Bibcode:2015Univ....1...38I. doi:10.3390/universe1010038.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  7. ^ Iorio, Lorenzo (May 2015). "Gravitational anomalies in the solar system?". International Journal of Modern Physics D. 24 (6). arXiv:1412.7673. Bibcode:2015IJMPD..2430015I. doi:10.1142/S0218271815300153. 1530015.
  8. ^ Iorio, Lorenzo (December 2011). "Perturbed stellar motions around the rotating black hole in Sgr A* for a generic orientation of its spin axis". Physical Review D. 84 (12). arXiv:1107.2916. Bibcode:2011PhRvD..84l4001I. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.124001. 124001.
  9. ^ Iorio, Lorenzo (July 2003). "The Impact of the Static Part of the Earth's Gravity Field on Some Tests of General Relativity with Satellite Laser Ranging". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 86 (3): 277-294. arXiv:gr-qc/0203050. Bibcode:2003CeMDA..86..277I. doi:10.1023/A:1024223200686.