User talk:Kzl.zawlin

The article Gestalt Collapse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disregarding Wikipedia, the album is by far the most common usage. Google scholar appears to indicate Gestalt collapse disorder the most common scholarly use. This use is questionable, at best; it may be a bad translation from Japanese.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Separation process a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Separation Science. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen.

To avoid confusion, I have reverted the move and restored the article, including your subsequent edits, at the old title. If you prefer a different title, I suggest you seek comments on the article's talk page before moving it. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 18:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bokko (manga), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bokko (manga) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bokko (manga) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of pentesting distributions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pratyya ^(Hello!) 13:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Penetration test does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate your attempt at improving the article, you're adding material without references. Please stop do that. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok i hear you but pls dont remove the todo comments next time. i will remove them after i no longer have any intention of working on the article. they have no visually or otherwise undesirable effects. i always provide edit summaries unless it's a minor edit, a comment for me in this case. Kzl.zawlin (talk) 18:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i would also like to suggest for those part that you think are in need of citation, pls mark them so that i can find acceptable references. Kzl.zawlin (talk) 18:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you need to keep a to-do list, you may do so on your own page or a sub-page created here. I will make one for you and moved your to do list there: User:Kzl.zawlin/Penetration test to do.

I did mark the entire sections that need citations.

I would also like to suggest that you start to use proper English capitalization and punctuation. --Walter Görlitz (talk)

I also noticed that you reverted the entire page to your preferred version. I now suspect that this is for a school project or something similar. I promise that I will revert any bad edits I see you make. Do not revert corrections I make to the article again, it may be perceived as uncooperative editing. I have already explained that it had incorrect capitalization rules and use of punctuation. There were other errors that I won't go into now, but you're quite close to receiving a second warning for your behaviour. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penetration test, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nessus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]