User talk:Jpbowen

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello Jpbowen, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Lst27 (talk) 22:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It's possible that given the size of this company it does meet our notability guidelines, however the sources on this draft are of insufficient quality. If you can help improve the sourcing I would be happy to reconsider this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nakheel Properties and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nakheel Properties, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 23:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpbowen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Salimfadhley (talk) 23:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One question, are art galleries and art centers considered museums? Well I recently did an article about an art center in Al Ain. I used the museum infobox for the article, since other articles about art centers on Wikipedia use this infobox, an example are the articles on Arlington Arts Center and Woodruff Arts Center. Bkissin who accepted my draft placed the Wikiproject Museums banner on the talk page and placed the "Museums in the United Arab Emirates" category. I plan to do an article on the Nairobi Gallery in Kenya, and I wonder if I should place the museums infobox for that article.-Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 00:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A museum is normally distinguished by a permanent collection of objects. The AlQattara Arts Centre apparently has "a small museum in which archaeological artifacts are stored", so would seem to qualify. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpbowen: By the way, I found an image on Flickr that has a license compatible with Wikipedia, should I place this image in the article Al Qattara Arts Centre?-Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 21:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That should be fine if you follow all the "rules"! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpbowen: Thank you very much for adding categories to the Al Qattara Arts Center article, could you do the same for the Skifa Kahla article? Skifa Kahla is a fortification in Mahdia, Tunisia. In the Al Qattara Arts Center article I added two sources in Arabic, they explain a little about the construction of the Al Qattara fort, its construction dates back to the Iron Age.-Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 17:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added categories and did some tidying. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For information, I have published with IGI Global in the past, but not since 2011, ten years ago. I am unlikely to again with the controversy around the company. I have never been paid by IGI Global and I have never paid them any money (e.g. for publication). I do not know anyone in the company and I have not contacted them since 2011. In my recent edits of Draft:IGI Global, I have added a "Controversy" section with references, that I believe makes the company "notable" in Wikipedia terms. In the past, some Wikipedia editors have been actively hostile to the company, accusing it of being a "vanity publishing" company and using this as a reason for it to be removed from Wikipedia. However, given that I have never paid any money to the company, this is not my experience. In any case, this is orthogonal to arguments for or against whether it should be on Wikipedia. In fact, I believe the number of independent references generated by the controversy means that it should be on Wikipedia. And I believe that the fact that I have not been in contact with the company for ten years means that I am sufficiently independent for there not to be any serious WP:COI. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ecker Flying Boat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dana Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Katakana546 (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mhawk10 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The "controversy" section reads as if it were written by IGI Global's PR team as a way to pre-empt serious critique rather than if it were written by a neutral observer. There are very good journal articles about this; cite those and write a good section that actually handles the serious criticisms of the business, such as that available at the link provided by Bonadea.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IGI Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IGI Global, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Mhawk10 (talk) 08:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Musée de la Culture Diola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kapok.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alumni by educational institution has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discovery Gardens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discovery Gardens (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 00:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is an example where WP:ATD, WP:NEXIST, WP:PRESERVE, and WP:NOTCLEANUP policies apply. Please consider alternatives to deletion in future. Wikipedia is a modern dynamic encyclopedia rather than an old-school library-style resource with gatekeepers. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emaar Properties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australian Magazine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 12:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of Oxford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Oxford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Banks Irk (talk) 18:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article POL Oxygen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page has existed since 2005 and it is still only a single paragraph.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gusfriend (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jpbowen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wytham Abbey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jpbowen, I work for ADNOC and I recently posted an edit request on Talk:Sultan Al Jaber. I noticed that you are a member of WP:UAE, so I was hoping you would have an interest in implementing those straightforward edits. Thanks so much. CB at ADNOC (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you did some editing at Exhibition catalogue (thank you!). Personally I feel that 'exhibition catalogue' really refers to the type produced to accompany exhibitions at galleries and museums, rather than the trade show type also discussed in that article. I posted on the talk page about moving that stuff to the trade show article. What do you think? Talk:Exhibition_catalogue#(Re)move_the_bit_about_trade_fair_catalogues? Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, fine by me, feel free to go ahead! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Academics of the University of Turku has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/Dubai Metro left/Route 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/Dubai Metro right/Route 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1500s establishments in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1630s establishments in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1680s establishments in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1502 establishments in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chester Toy and Doll Museum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chester Toy and Doll Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Happyecheveria (talk) 03:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1460s establishments in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ib Holm Sørensen, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ib Holm Sørensen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Keith Ovenden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, doesn't meet notability requirements for Creative professionals

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Joseph Thornton (bookseller)
• Tennis Court Road
• Guillermo Martínez (writer)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sergiy Vilkomir, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergiy Vilkomir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ib Holm Sorensen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Paris, France/Musees/Louvre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 6#Paris, France/Musees/Louvre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 17:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devas Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Club.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jpbowen. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. While normally it's okay to copy from one Wikipedia article to another (as long as proper attribution is provided), it's not okay to paste content from a deleted article into an extant article. That's because the attribution has been lost - the list of contributors in the article history is a record of everyone who contributed to the article, and we need that list to fulfill the "attribution" part of our Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Sorry but I have had to remove your addition to Virtual Library museums pages for that reason. — Diannaa (talk) 01:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation, is it OK to rewrite a section from scratch? This is part of VLmp. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay to include a paragraph of new prose; don't copy anything from the deleted article please. — Diannaa (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jpbowen, wondered if you could give your wiki thoughts on this draft: Draft:Department of Biology, University of Oxford. I work for the Uni so I have a COI, but the Department was just launched to replace the old departments of Zoology and Plant Sciences, so I have taken content from there and been as objective as possible when creating the page. 48jkb35m (talk) 16:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@48jkb35m the issue seems to be that the department is so new that there are no adequate independent references yet. Has the opening of the department been covered in newspapers, magazines or journals? These would help. otherwise, it would be best to include information on the new department under sections in the pages on the two old departments until the new department has sufficient independent coverage. I hope this helps. 86.187.225.140 (talk) 19:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works based on real people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Self portrait of Ian Hunter (1939-2017).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restored image, although some confusion with date of death. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Self portrait of Ian Hunter (1939-2017).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Boston, USA and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 9#Boston, USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wytham Abbey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Terrence Masson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Narrowed link, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Green Planet, Dubai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Todd Webb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnegie Museum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Updated link, needs a fact check. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article International Association of Panoramic Photographers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to meet WP:ORG. Only a primary source provided.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved page with references, information, infobox, etc. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 22:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Prof. Bowen. I came across a bunch of documents with your name on them, outlining microprocessors, their pinouts, and instructions sets -- all formatted neatly in ASCII and with scripts to create PostScript and PDF outputs. These have come in handy many times over the last few years as I work with some vintage equipment, and when I found out who you actually were I had to stop by and say hello, and thanks for your excellent work from circa 1985!

Cheers, MrAureliusR_Talk! 18:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear that they are still useful, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 16:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article South Sudan National Museum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No coverage to meet WP:ORG and no evidence this museum actually opened.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added some more information and references. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Jpbowen,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and best wishes for 2023 to you too. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jonathan! I saw that you have made some really valuable contributions to WP Visual Arts and I am looking for editors interested in collaborating on Portrait of Count Stanislas Potocki, a painting by Jacques-Louis David from 1781. The article has been mostly abandoned for the last two years and I would love to bring it to GA or FA level, though due to academic writing commitments, I might be unable to do it on my own any time soon. And feel free to recommend someone else if this is not something you would be interested in participating. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts! Many thanks. Ppt91 (talk) 19:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Arts centres in Sweden has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Education in Nuuk indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galerie Urs Meile, Beijing-Lucerne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galerie Urs Meile, Beijing-Lucerne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enough references have been found for a "Keep", IMHO. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 23:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Doree has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 25 § Doree until a consensus is reached. J947 † ^edits 22:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Recurring events established in 1268 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. Anthony Hyman, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Anthony Hyman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Webster (organist), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Webster (organist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virtual Library museums pages, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Library museums pages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Systems has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 02:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conceptual systems has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 02:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Addison Road, London is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addison Road, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rschen7754 06:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chunchen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mengjie and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baoshan (given name) – no notability or navigational value for these articles about transliterations of multiple Chinese given names.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bardwell Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardwell Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rschen7754 19:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Physical systems has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 16:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Museums in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dubai Spice Souk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link updated, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lisa Park (artist), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BFA and MPS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links updated, thank you. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melbury Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zulu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Addison Road, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Allan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, University don. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Don (academia). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Don (academia). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 13:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Innovators has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:34, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People's Republic of China people by occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oxford Centre for Mission Studies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. G. Jeffreys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australian Imperial Force.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Social history of the United Kingdom has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 29 § Social history of the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Concerns raised in the deletion discussion that this article does not represent the widespread viewpoint that IGI engages in "vampire press" practices do not appear to be addressed. Indeed the "controversies" section goes out of its way to discredit this mainstream viewpoint and push a minority POV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IGI Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Balaklava Bay (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Sharaf DG (disambiguation)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Applied Science University, Bahrain.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Under licencing, I added

{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0|migration=redundant}}

{{FoP-USonly|Bahrain}}

Is this correct? —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Provinces of India has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English literature academics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 6 § Category:Alumni by university or college in the United Kingdom on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 17:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1955 in mathematics has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1974 in mathematics has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1970s in mathematics has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1950s in mathematics has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lizbeth Goodman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not meeting WP:NOTABILITY standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avishai11 (talk) 00:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lizbeth Goodman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizbeth Goodman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Avishai11 (talk) 00:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 27 § Category:Art museums and galleries established in 1715 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 30 § Category:Art museums and galleries disestablished in 1552 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Education by city or town on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Scientific organizations established in 2022 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 19 § Category:Museums established in 1596 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article European Academy of Optometry and Optics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources to demonstrate notability per WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the page. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Craven Street

added a link pointing to John Murray

European Academy of Optometry and Optics

added a link pointing to Charity

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have corrected the links. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Nina Carroll requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jpbowen, I've moved this to User:Jpbowen/Nina Carroll so you can keep working on it—feel free to move it back when you're finished. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have installed the page. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 11:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Honey Hill Mews has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 2 § Honey Hill Mews until a consensus is reached. Peter James (talk) 20:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portland Gallery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Art fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1867 establishments in Croatia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sepersontics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 28 § Sepersontics until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 23:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ham II (talk) 07:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charlie Ahearn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion would be greatly appreciated in this Articles for deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Central_Illinois%27_On-Line_Broadcast_Museum
—User:BuffaloBob

I made some updates to Central Illinois' On-Line Broadcast Museum and added a comment. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. BuffaloBob (talk) 21:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, I noticed that in creating Oxford Women Students' Society for Women's Suffrage you linked to the dab page Hyde Park. I've fixed the link. But here's a standard message I offer:

There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. Thanks, and Happy Editing.

(I came to the page because it links to a page I created so I got a notification, then spotted the orange link!) PamD 19:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip, I have followed your advice! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 10:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be of use. I find it a really helpful way to get things right (or less wrong). PamD 11:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Oxford Society for Women's Suffrage has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases, especially if they are not attributed to their source, may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because close paraphrasing is sometimes hard to catch yourself doing, please view the automated flagging of this edit by our CopyPatrol system. If you connect your account to it, you should be able to view something called an "iThenticate" report. This highlights all the shared words that the computer spotted. It's not always very smart (it sometimes flags proper nouns and lists of names) but in this case, large amounts of the underlying sentence structure, the author's comparasions and links they made between facts, and original vocabulary remained intact.

I've also had a look at one of your recently created articles, Gunfield. I haven't examined it thoroughly, but I am already seeing some similarities that are making me concerned. For example,

The article: In the 1930s, a low single-storey service space and garage with a rectangular gazebo roof was added to the front of the former chapel (later a music room), and the existing chapel window was reconfigured

The source: In the 1930s a low single-storey service space and garage with a rectangular gazebo roof was added to the front of the MCR and the existing chapel window was reconfigured.

The article: A link to the chapel was added in 1915 by Arthur Hamilton Moberly. A three-storey loggia onto the rear garden was also built by Moberly at the same time.

The source:A link to the chapel was added in 1915 by Arthur Hamilton Moberly. The three-storey loggia onto the garden was also built by Moberly at this time.

I know this isn't a pleasant message to receive, but would you consider voluntarily giving up your autopatrolled rights at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled or by asking an administrator directly? I can ping one for you, if you'd like. I believe your new creations would strongly benefit review by the new page patrollers, so they can help prevent this issue from re-occuring. It won't have any impact on you or the way you create articles- it just allows for a second pair of eyes to ensure that Wikipedia can comply with its non free content policies.

GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 20:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for spotting this. I am normally more careful with paraphrasing, but I think I hit the save button too early for these cases. I see that you have edited Oxford Society for Women's Suffrage. I have now edited Gunfield, based on your comments above. Let me know if you spot any more issues. I will be more careful in future! —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, tell me about it- it's one of those things I think a lot of people fall prone to! And thank you for fixing the Gunfield article- I'm going to have a more in-depth look at it this weekend, but don't let me stop you from double-checking it yourself!

That being said, recent cases of close paraphrasing issues does disqualify anybody from either holding or receiving the autopatrolled right. I've opened a thread on ANI asking for somebody to pull it. It's not a sanction, and, again, will have no impact on the way you create articles. It'll just send them through the New Pages queue for others to look at. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:01, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oxfordshire Historic Churches Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxfordshire Historic Churches Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 23:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 17:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Collections of museums in Ukraine indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]