User talk:Igny

Igny is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia in a few weeks

Archives

/EE Battleground /Math /Misc

Hello, I have mentioned you in a requests for amendment at Arbitration, you can find the discussion here. Thank you. Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 05:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Igny: Hello. This is just to let you know that you've been mentioned in the following request at the Mediation Cabal, which is a Wikipedia dispute resolution initiative that resolves disputes by informal mediation.

The request can be found at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor.

Just so you know, it is entirely your choice whether or not you participate. If you wish to do so, and we'll see what we can do about getting this sorted out. At MedCab we aim to help all involved parties reach a solution and hope you will join in this effort.

If you have any questions relating to this or any other issue needing mediation, you can ask on the case talk page, the MedCab talk page, or you can ask the mediator, Steven Zhang, at their talk page.

MedcabBot (talk) 14:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Igny, your DIGWUREN topic ban has been amended to allow you to participate in the above mediation case. The conditions of the modification are set out here. Please let me know if you have any questions. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Igny, this is Mr. Stradivarius from the Holodomor Medcab mediation. The mediation has been going slowly recently, and as you might have seen from the mediation page, we have been talking about appointing spokespersons for each other to get things moving along. The other mediators and I have decided that it's best to impose a deadline for deciding spokespersons, otherwise it really doesn't look like this mediation is going to progress. So, we would like you to authorize another editor who you trust to be a spokesperson for your viewpoint, by 12am, December 1st, 2011 (UTC). If you do not decide a spokesperson by this time, then we will proceed with the mediation even if you provide no input. You can find more details on our ideas for spokespersons and on what has been discussed so far at the spokespersons section on the mediation page. Thank you again for your cooperation. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 11:02, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, here's User:Steven Zhang's outline of how the spokesperson system will work, for your reference:

Basically how this works, two, three or four editors are appointed by the rest of the editors as spokespersons for their collective viewpoints. This spokesperson should be the only one who presents the views of the collective people he/she represents. I'm going to ask each of you to consider nominating a spokesperson, or who you would like to represent your viewpoints, and if you do not wish to do this, to provide an explanation and a commitment to remain active throughout the mediation case. We're still on the first issue and need to crank things up a gear.

So please leave your username and who you would like to nominate as your spokesperson here; or if you do not wish to nominate a spokesperson, please leave a commitment that you will remain active throughout the rest of the Holodomor mediation. Thanks again. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 12:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let you know that the deadline for deciding spokespersons has passed, and that we will be progressing with the mediation without your input. You are, of course, free to comment or to nominate a spokesperson at any time. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 11:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Igny: Hello, this is to let you know that a Mediation Cabal case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our talk page so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator, Steven Zhang, on their talk page. Thanks! MedcabBot (talk) 12:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Igny, this is a boilerplate message to let you know that we have moved on to issue two of the Holodomor mediation, victim estimates. At the moment we are accepting statements from all participants, so if you want to make your position on this issue known, then now would be a very good time to contribute. Your statement should be no longer than 200 words, and should include both your opinion on the issue and what you hope will be addressed in the mediation. We will be accepting statements until 00:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC), or until we have statements from all spokespersons. Please note, however, that even if you miss this deadline you are free to contribute to the mediation at any time. You can find the appropriate section on the mediation page here. All the best — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 06:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Igny: Hello, this is to let you know that a Mediation Cabal case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our talk page so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator, Steven Zhang, on their talk page. Thanks! MedcabBot (talk) 06:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Igny: Hello, this is to let you know that a Mediation Cabal case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our talk page so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator, Steven Zhang, on their talk page. Thanks! MedcabBot (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Igny: Hello, this is to let you know that a Mediation Cabal case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/02 October 2011/Holodomor

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our talk page so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator, Steven Zhang, on their talk page. Thanks! MedcabBot (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Igny. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:20, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for your visualisation for this article - if its ok I added it to the article. Thank you and well done! =) F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 12:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that edit warring does not require a 3RR "bright line infraction". Please self-revert your reinsertion of the "pov tag" ay yhe Baltic occupation article. Cheers. Collect (talk) 13:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Igny, please, do not revert Estlandia's revert. In this situation one must stay cool.--Paul Siebert (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You would think that Miacek would know better than do WP:NINJA reverts for his buddies... (Igny (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Miacek? Who is Miacek?--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Miacek was one of WP:EEML#Involved parties. At that time it was highly surprising because he was known for his integrity in many WP aspects. That is also why I found it rather surprising for him to get involved here... (Igny (talk) 00:13, 18 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Aha, I thought he was some new uninvolved user. I suggest you to behave as cautious and as cool as possible. In my opinion, jumping into this swamp right after the end of your topic ban was a mistake. BTW, do you have any idea about User:UUNC? If it was you who asked him to comment, it would be correct to explain that openly. We must be as honest as possible.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I could not care less about my topic ban. It actually ended two months ago which my opponents clearly do not realize in their ad hominem arguments and personal attacks. I was hoping to stay away from this swamp for one full year, but I could not pass Martin's unilateral decision to rename Template:Occupation and annexation of the Baltic states sidebar. I do not know much about UUNC. I suspect he is a WP:SOCK, but I have no clear idea who was behind him. There were a multitude of pro-Russian editors banned from EE (including, to my surprise, Russiavia) UUNC could be any one of them. It was also possible that it was merely a bait, a provocation for me from my oponents.(Igny (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I know noone who expressed interest to this area and who was recently banned. AFAIK, Russavia didn't edit the article belonging to that family.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the POV tag will be removed again, do not try to restore it, please. Let's wait.--Paul Siebert (talk) 02:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Igny, 'editors' instead of 'opponents', lest someone think you are on the wp:battleground. Darkstar1st (talk) 02:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a report on you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Igny reported by User:Toddy1 (Result: )--Toddy1 (talk) 06:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usually joining an edit war is not part of the procedure to report an edit war. Just so you know... (Igny (talk) 09:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

You are subject of an AE report here. --Nug (talk) 10:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Baltic states. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 15:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As the result of an arbitration enforcement discussion, you are notified that you are topic banned indefinitely from the subject of Eastern Europe, broadly construed. This ban includes, but is not limited to, discussion of the subject on any page on Wikipedia, except to file an appeal to your sanction in the proper venue. You may appeal the sanction to the imposing administrator, the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, or the arbitration committee, either on the basis of error or to appeal for the sanction to be lifted after a period of good behavior. While the ban is in force, any edit in defiance of the ban will lead to a block from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Igny,

I noticed you contributed to some discussions on this talkpage in 2009. Would you care to comment on the issues I have raised now? Just to get a broader sense of what I can achieve here at Wikipedia. Thanks! 2001:1C02:1907:9500:9CF9:5773:9F59:2B43 (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Igny. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Igny. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Igny. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]