User talk:Herbfur

For personal reasons, I will be less active on Wikipedia in the coming months. I will still be able to make smaller edits from time to time, and I will still answer pings and talk page messages.

Hello, welcome to my talk page. Feel free to add any questions or concerns for me here. And remember to sign posts using 4 tildes! Thanks for visiting and happy editing.

If you're looking for conversations from prior to 22:35 on 27 June 2020, please follow this link.
If you're looking for conversations from 22:35 on 27 June 2020 to 24:00 on 31 December 2020, please follow this link.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Herbfur}}), so that I will be notified. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified. Please click here to leave me a new message.

"released to manufacturing on August 15, 1995, and generally to retail on August 24, 1995"

Can you please explain how it is possible to manufacture a retail product in about a week? RTM on August 15 1995 doesn't make sense to me. Thank you. 0ldStaph (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@0ldStaph:The retail product was created over several years, beginning in around 1993. In software production, manufacturers of computers usually first receive the software to load on new computers before a copy of the software is available as a standalone copy to purchase. The "release to manufacturers" date isn't related to when the software was actually developed. Please see Software lifecycle for more information. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Herbfur: What I mean is that the "release to manufacturers" date (August 15) is too close to the date August 24 when the Retail boxes hit the stores. My point is that the actual RTM date was probably several months prior to the Launch of W95. The date on the Retail box indicate May 1995. Do you have any references to RTM August 15?

0ldStaph (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@0ldStaph: I looked into it more and I think you might be right. I've found nothing backing an August 15 RTM date so far. I haven't found any reliable sources on this. Could you provide references for the date on the retail box? This merits further investigation. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 20:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Herbfur: I own the box and also found similar box with the 0595 date here: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/windows-95-upgrade-5-floppy-disk-1792400674 0ldStaph (talk) 20:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@0ldStaph: The source seems to be in order, just I'm not sure how I would interpret the 0595 part, it might not mean May 1995 (Unfortunately, guessing would probably be WP:OR). I'm going to start a discussion about this at Talk:Windows 95, I'm glad you brought this up. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 21:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Herbfur: Thank you! By WP do you mean Week of Production? Some more examples with dates, Win98, ME and XP:

https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/microsoft-windows-98-upgrade-sealed-1788173816 https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/microsoft-windows-95-98-full-version-1820421521 https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/brand-microsoft-windows-xp-1790221187 0ldStaph (talk) 22:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@0ldStaph:By WP, I mean the Wikipedia policy, haha. WP indicates the namespace of the article (which is "Wikipedia"). You can find out more here: WP:Namespace. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 01:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yan Can Cook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work to maintain Wikipedia Policies and reverse vandalism on political and biographical articles, and in particular your recent work on articles related to the 2020 United States Presidential Election! Enjoy a cup of coffee for your efforts! Builder018 (talk) 16:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I like your solution to the pronouns question! —valereee (talk) 14:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee: Thank you! I just sorta got tired of being misgendered on talk pages, so I figured this would make my pronouns so clear that nobody could misgender me ever again haha Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised you were misgendered...most people seem to assume maleness rather than the other way around. —valereee (talk) 16:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Android Lollipop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Inauguration Day, and thank you for reverting President of the United States to revision 1001643698! beetricks ~ talk · email 17:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, we do not yet have consensus about whether to delete the article MacBook Air (M1). As a contributor to the MacBook articles, I'd like to invite you to take part in the discussion on the deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacBook Air (M1). Thank you! Andibrema (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Andibrema: - Thanks for letting me know! I've weighed in with my thoughts. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 02:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Herbfur! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Lua?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... but I'm new at using User Talk Pages. Perhaps your User Talk Page is a better place to make my comment than the way I did it, at the talk page for Rosetta (software). Oaklandguy (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Safari version table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Safari version table/Safari version has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I should really learn on how to actually operate on reverting edits without blindly doing so. Thanks for the catch. T^{fess up?}_{or down?} 04:28, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I honestly had to read over the edit several times to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding anything so I totally get it. Happy Holidays! Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 20:20, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why season 3 which aired in 2022 has been eliminated from the page? I think it’s an error. Please check it 70.125.228.35 (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I believe season 3 was renamed by an editor to series 3 at this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breeders%20(TV%20series)&diff=1127629659&oldid=1127465421 . Further edits then led series 3 to be labeled under the year 2023. I personally only edited the page because I saw what appeared to be an unconstructive edit in recent changes. If you’re able to, I encourage you to edit the page to reflect the correct information, citing sources in the process. Let me know if you need any more help! Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- I removed the section entitle Trump-Ukraine scandal since this is section is misinformation. Even the President of Ukraine denied he was never pressured, and there was no quid-pro-quo. You can see this in a far-left outlet TIME.

- All of the sources from this paragraph are far-left sources with CNN, NYT, WAPO, Politico, and NBC News.

- This section does not provide any context to the political witch-hunt that was conducted by Democrats and some in the Executive branch which began with the False Russia hoax initiated by Trump's prior political opponent, Hillary Clinton.

I am removing this section again until it is properly cited and context is provided on how this was part of the same political witch-hunt as the False Russia hoax.

TIME is regarded by the Wikipedia community to be a reliable source, per WP:RSP. CNN, NYT, WAPO, Politico, and NBC are also regarded to be generally reliable per the Wikipedia community. While your opinion may be that the investigation was a witch hunt, you would need to discuss this change and provide reliable sources to back your position, with respect to Wikipedia policies. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) (talk) 03:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you uploaded a high-quality version of the BTHS logo back in August of 2021 (File:Bthslogo.JPG). I was wondering where you got it from since I can't seem to find a version that's higher quality than the current one (318x318), which is not high enough quality for me to use or get a good vectorization of using Adobe Illustrator for use. GMarcus646 (talk) 02:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current iOS 12 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current iPadOS/short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]