User talk:Erebus555/archive

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Erebus555. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I saw you edited the article a little bit so could you help me ectract some infrmation about the tower from the German wikipedia articule. I used google to translat, and It is a bit hard to read. I provided a link in the refrance. Could you help me out by doing the same with the Messtrum and DZ bank, also in Frankfurt. Alaskan assassin (talk) 03:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

EREBUS.EREBUS.EREUBUS. if i go 2 every article you write which is uncited then im sure you will find some clever ecuse as to why it is correct

Feel free. Many of my older articles have uncited material in them, but this hasn't been challenged by other editors. If it is, then I will tend to add the material again with citation to support it. If I cannot find the citation, than I accept the other editor's decision and leave it be. - Erebus555 19:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

OK, now I don't know what you are talking about. As an experienced editor, I do not go around deleting material willy nilly. Any removal of content is explained and justified. As far as I am aware, the information I deleted from the article you mention was uncited and by Wikipedia policy, any material that is uncited may be challenged and removed at any time. I intend on continuing to contribute and removing or merging material if Wikipedia policy allows me to. Please do not come along with sweeping statements next time when it is you who doesn't know what they are talking about. - Erebus555 19:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

rv it wasnt me!

honest!

UKbandit 15:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry! You misread the edit summary (which is automatic by the way), it said I reverted an edit back to what the page looked like when YOU edited it. It doesn't say I reverted your edit :-). - Erebus555 15:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

ah, doh! UKbandit 16:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I've just read the City of Birmingham Stadium article, which you contributed a lot to - thanks. A lot of the references are to a digital brain page. Is it yours? I'd like to know where the stuff about the stadium came from. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 18:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

The digital brain link is not mine, sorry. I found the links to the images on a forum page about this development, and from my understanding, these were released as part of the development details - though I cannot find where from. May I ask why you were asking? - Erebus555 18:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Curiosity, and in search of more citeable references. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 19:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Dear Mr Erebus,

Given that there is a current propaganda war from the grim mill town of Manchester to proclaim itself as the second city, even though it is ranked 8th by the office of National Statistics figures (2005) population estimates, I do not find it acceptable for the Birmingham page to provide credibility for these rediculous claims. I have therefore deleted and will continue to delete this reference to Manchester to provide balance to the Wikipedia article.

Unlike the Birmingham page, the Manchester page proclaims itself as the second city and carries no such reference to the fact that this is disputed by Birmingham. In the interests of fairness and balance I find this an unacceptable bias and will make amendments to rectify.

Kind regards

Prof Rob Right

If you read the Second city of the United Kingdom article, you will notice that the artticle explains that there is now several more factors used when it comes to deciding which city should be given the "second city" title. These include cultural, political and economical factors as well as the population figures you outlined.

For the Birmingham page to provide reference to Manchester shows it to balanced and not from one single point of view. The fact that this is cited too shows that it is a credible claim.

If you continue to delete this from the article, you will be starting an edit war between you and other editors. This means that you will eventually be blocked by an administrator for a time period decided upon by them. As well as that, you will find that other editor's efforts to give the article Featured Article status have been in vain as it is the subject of an edit war - as one of the criteria for featured article status states that it must not be subject to this.

Therefore, you should stop deleting such information from the Birmingham article and actually contribute to the Manchester article by adding that Birmingham is a rival to this. This would therefore balance out the two articles. - Erebus555 13:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Erebus555, if I understand your post at talk:Manchester correctly, you have removed a reference to Manchester from the Birmingham article because references in the opposite direction (for want of a better description) are removed - even though you think the article is improved by the cross-referencing. Forgive me, but it seems a bit odd to deliberately degrade the Birmingham article because of anything happening to the Manchester article. Regards, Mr Stephen 11:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

I did this seeing as the editor on the Manchester article removed the reference to Birmingham per discussions on talk page archives. This led me to believe that such information added to the Birmingham article, therefore, must not comply with the discussions which have taken place. It maybe best to come to an agreement to whether these references to Birmingham and Manchester on the articles should be included, as I can see it touches a nerve with some editors. - Erebus555 11:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello Erebus555,

I'd be happy to produce a localised map for the city. This issue seems to have risen elsewhere in stopping UK settlement articles recieving GA and FA.

What I require is some source material; a few problems include do we use a Birmingham map or a City of Birmingham map, and how do we divide the map (by ward, or other kind of division)? If we use a Birmingham map, then where does its "official" boundaries end? What should be included on the map?

From memory, User:Fingerpuppet may be helpful here. Once we've sorted these, it wouldn't take me long to put something together. Hope that helps, Jza84 18:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

That map is excellent - give me a week or so and I'll see what I can do. With regards to the Birmingham article text, some of the content needs to be ordered according to the UK settlements guidelines on sections, (Geog, then Hist, then Demographics, then Landmarks, and then Transport etc are later sections. Administration should be Politics or Political representation, and Famous residents should be titled Notable Brummies) and I believe the infobox should be contiguous to bring it inline with the rest of the UK. Just some pointers!

I've got quite a few maps to make, but I'll make this one a priority. Jza84 21:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting the vandalism warning on my talk page. I've raised my concerns at the admin noticeboard, as I feel this is becoming a little targetted against me and that article, despite attempts for a compromise and engagement.

I haven't forgotten about the Birmingham map (see I'm not a raging Manc! - well not even a Manc at all!), I've just had a few county maps to roll out first that I'd comitted too. Thanks again, Jza84 18:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:G_Force.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 15:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

As a recent, and possibly significant, contributor to the Second city of the United Kingdom article, I'd like to direct your attention to this edit on the Talk Page regarding a Request for Rational Debate on the subject of the article. All the best. Sprigot 15:13, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello, and sorry for the delay in responding!

I'm still in the middle of a backlog for infobox county maps which I'm trying to roll out asap. I do still intend to aid in other projects like Birmingham however.

I use a package called Adobe Illustrator CS. It's an industry-standard graphics software package, which I think produces much higher quality vector images (< see the article if you're not as much of a graphics-nerd as I) than other image-making software.

I also complete my images in Adobe Photoshop CS before uploading them to Wikipedia. I have a degree in Visual Arts and I think it's needed to use Illustrator as it's a little tricky for new comers.

It's a real shame that this package is being downloaded illegally and anonymously through p2p networks like Shareaza.com and is avaliable to anyone with an internet connection. If you happened to buy a copy however, I'd be more than willing to share how I create maps in more detail.

Does that help? Jza84 00:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

That's very helpful, thanks. It seems then that it might not be for me, despite usually teaching myself as I go along with most software. So I think I'll just leave it all to you - you are the expert in this field after all, by the sounds of that degree! Happy editing! - Erebus555 09:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Armada Towers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Luke! 15:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Green Lakes, Dubai, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Green Lakes, Dubai satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Lakes, Dubai and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Green Lakes, Dubai during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Luke! 16:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

My apologies for not using the most recent version as I must have been viewing another version when adding the notice. Luke! 16:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello! I've noticed you said that WP:Derbyshire would be a good idea. The project now has 5 (maybe 6?) supporters, and so I've created a temporary page within my User Space. Please expand it, and then we will move it over. I'm currently working on a logo, Userboxes, Talk Page Banners etc, and a few adminy pages, assessment, template, stub etc. It's at WP:Derbys if you want to expand it. Thanks, Bluegoblin7 17:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

There is a discussion about the appropriateness or otherwise of some links that have been added to a number of pages, and subsequently removed. As you are a member of the project, you may wish to comment at

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Waterways#Pennine Waterways Links —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayalld (talk • contribs) 14:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Do blocks of flats have separate pages on the wiki? What sort of page should Samuel Vale House, Coventry be included in. What is the correct term? "block of flats", "tower block" or "apartment block". Snowman 17:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, we refer to them as tower blocks if they are above 6 storeys in height. Below that, they can be called blocks of flats. Tower blocks have their own individual articles, as do large blocks of flats. The article you asked about would be called Samuel Vale House, although, if there was an article already by that name, then the article name should be Samuel Vale House, Coventry. A reference to it should be made on Samuel Vale House. The wiki really wants as much info as possible. The main info that users have is the number of floors, location (down to road name if possible), height in metres and date of construction. If you had all that information then the article would look like: "Samuel Vale House is a 17 storey tower block on X Road, Coventry. Completed in 19xx, it is xx metres tall." We also have categories as well just to keep it all organised. The style is very similar, or possibly equal to, that of Wikipedia. Hope that helps! - Erebus555 18:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The categories in wikicommons refers to "apartment blocks", and as far as I could find "Category:Towers in the United Kingdom" also contains monuments. I can not get started with the categories on commons for residential tower blocks at the present time. I new category structure might need building, or have I missed something. Snowman 19:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, are we talking about wikicommons or that UK Housing Wiki that's linked to from my userpage? I'm getting confused or maybe it's the alcohol getting to me. - Erebus555 19:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The wiki is the en wiki, and wikicommons is wikicommons where the image has been uploaded to. Snowman 20:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

OK, sorry, I got confused. I am not too sure in which category the image should be placed, to be honest. May I suggest asking User:DWaterson as he seems to have more experience and knowledge of Wikicommons. Sorry again. - Erebus555 17:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter

File:WPGM nl.png The WikiProject Greater Manchester Newsletter Issue I - October 2007 Got any suggestions? - Add them here Member news The project currently has 21 members. However, it could increase with the {{Welcome WPGM}} on usertalk pages, as seen with GRB1972 Pages Needing Attention Didsbury - it recently failed a GA review - could it be promoted eventually? Current Debates Should The Filmworks and The Printworks be merged? See here for more. Monthly Challenges May seem like old news now, but Manchester was recently listed as a good article, try and make as much effort as you can with trying to make it featured. Manchester Airport has seen unprecedented vandalism from anonymous editors recently, on 24th September it was protected by MastCell for a period of 1 week. Make sure to visit the page (after that date) regularly so we can stamp out any "bad edits". Try to invite more members to this project. As much as a streamlined team is good, the more editors we have the broader the range we can cover. Created by Rudget Contributions | Single-Page View

The WikiProject Derbyshire Newsletter Issue I - October 2007 Got any suggestions? - Add them here

Editor's Message Hello, and welcome to this first issue! Please keep on contributing here. and keep your comments coming in. If you wish to continue to receive this, then add your name to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Derbyshire/Newsletter, otherwise you will not receive it after this issue! Thanks! Bluegoblin7 19:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Member news The project currently has 10 members. However, it could increase by YOU telling others about the Project!

This Month's Achievements! We have NO unassessed articles We have a live portal We have lots of project pages There are over 200 tagged articles

Monthly Challenges Create a welcome message for new and prospective members. The Portal is now live, so please keep nominating and voting for the relevant articles! Try to invite more members to this project. As much as a streamlined team is good, the more editors we have the broader the range we can cover. Nominate for next month's collaboration Created by Bluegoblin7

Hi Erebus555! Here is this month's newsletter! To continue recieveing it, follow the link within and add your name! Bluegoblin7 19:38, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi - I'd welcome any local knowledge you have about this church and Thomas Rickman, as I see you edited that article recently. According to the Birmingham Mail, the stained glass windows were designed and installed in the late 19th century by Thomas Rickman, and various sources state that the church was to have celebrated its 150th anniversary next year, giving it a date of construction of 1858. However this does not tie in with the dates in the article, 1776-1841. Can you shed any light on this anomaly please? Were there perhaps two architects with the same name? – Tivedshambo (talk) 17:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Well firstly, I can't see how Thomas Rickman installed stained glass windows in the church during the late 19th century when he died in the early to mid 19th century. The information I have found is a bit sketchy but can be pieced together. The actual church appears to have been built to a design by Thomas Rickman (or possibly Rickman and Hutchinson, which was the name of his practice) in 1822-23. In 1858, a district chapelry was assigned to the church under the name "The District Chapelry of Erdington". I currently have two book sources stating that the church was built in 1823 and just the one for the district chapelry statement. I hope this clears things up! - Erebus555 17:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

EDIT: I have also found that the church was consecrated on July 23, 1824. - Erebus555 17:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up. A sad loss to Erdington - I could see it burning from the station yesterday morning. Hopefully they can rebuild something from it. – Tivedshambo (talk) 18:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Why have I suddenly got a message from you, saying "welcome to Wikipedia" etc?

I've been contributing for many months now, why have I just got a welcome message from you?

Yours, puzzled,

WikiReaderer 15:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Thinking about it, I never did receive any welcome... :( That's OK WikiReaderer 15:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Greater Manchester Newsletter Issue II - November 2007 Got any suggestions? - Add them here Member news The project now has 28 members! 7 new participants enrolled this week, they can be viewed here. There was also change to the welcoming messages this month, by Jza84, which reinvigorated the style in response to the change of colours on the main and affiliated pages. See the welcome templates, here. Finally, a barnstar has been created for the project! See the final design on this page, and so far it has been awarded to one lucky participants, WebHamster. Well done. Greater Manchester Article News Well has this month been a hub of activity, or what? (See:Original diff) The new assessment scale has been welcomed by many here at WPGM and as of 4th November, 81.37% of all 650 articles have been assessed with both importance and class. Two articles have been passed good article criteria since last delivery, they are: Didsbury & Dunham Massey. Well done to all involved. Current Debates There was a lengthy debate over a certain number of related articles in Manchester City Centre this week, (See:the thread involved). Aytoun Street, Barton Square, Brazenoose Sqaure, Dover Street, Manchester and Police Street were all flagged by Pit-yacker as being deserved of deletion per lacking notablilty. The process took 5 days at articles for deletion and the result was, delete. Other sections that readied editors into scrambling over themselves this month were: should Greater Manchester boroughs get their own infobox? Such as with London boroughs. The debate continutes. Monthly Challenges Same as last month, we've have to get Manchester upto Featured Article Standard. However, with Manchester now rated as A-Class (above GA and below FA) it may be easier than first thought. Try to fill all the current "to do" requirements. There has also been some talk of increased activity of bringing Greater Manchester to Good Article Standard. It would be ideal if all 650 articles were at least GA standard, but that will never happen in the next month. But please if you can, assess your ability to understand an article and if you're acquauinted with the task in hand and potentially long wait for a writing and for a review, go ahead! Be bold. Manchester Airport once again saw more vandal edits this month, and was protected for another consecutive month on 22nd October by Jmlk17. Some users have also realised the extreme coincidence in the first half of 65% of editing IPs, i.e. all begin with "79.72". Could it be the same editor? If you can keep visiting the page to revert vandalism in sight. The most freqeunt additions that are factually incorrect are the inclusions of: Chicago O'Hare and New York-JFK to Pakistan International Airlines (T2) and Newquay to Air Southwest (T3). MAN also has a peer review. Although you may not have noticed that this WikiProject has a associated portal. The page named, Portal:North West England, is updated frequently, but it would be nice to get more editors. It too has recently undergone a peer review, and some criteria has been added to get the page to featured portal status. You could signify your involvement by adding {{User Portal NWE}} to your userpage. Created by Rudget | Single-Page View

Rudget _{Contributions} 17:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

The Derbyshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Derbyshire Newsletter Issue II - November 2007 Got any suggestions? - Add them here Editor's Message Hello, and welcome to this month's newsletter.! Please keep on contributing here, and keep your comments coming in. If you wish to continue to recieve this in future, then add your name to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Derbyshire/Newsletter, otherwise you will not recieve it after this issue! (Those who got this in Issue I I apologise, but only one person said they still wished to receive it! If you want either just a link, or just the banner, then please leave your name on the main page also. I have changed the format this month aswell so that it is collapsible! Thanks! Bluegoblin7 10:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Member news The project currently has 11 members. However, it could increase by YOU telling others about the Project! Special Thanks must go this month to users Victuallers and User:Xn4, for their sterling work within the project. Victuallers has led the way in getting several Derbyshire facts on the main page, and Xn4 has led the way in nominations for the selected image and article on the Portal. THANKS GUYS! This Month's Achievements! Several articles have gone for some of the higher ratings. Unfortunately, none succeeded, but please continue to improve them! Monthly Challenges Create a welcome message for new and prospective members. The Portal is now live, so please keep nominating and voting for the relevant articles! Try to invite more members to this project. As much as a streamlined team is good, the more editors we have the broader the range we can cover. Nominate for next month's collaboration Contribute to this month's collaboration Created by Bluegoblin7

Bluegoblin7 11:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Way back in Dec 2005 you created stubs for Pinhay Bay & Pinhay Cliffs stating they are in Somerset. I was trying to do some clean up for WikiProject Somerset & was going to merge them (I put merge tags on a couple of months ago) but I can't find any record, map or whatever for Pinhay Bay or Pinhay in Somerset - the only ones I can find are in Devon - do you have any other sources which say there are sites of this name in Somerset - or could we edit the article to put them in Devon?— Rod ^talk 21:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I haven't done any wikipedia stuff for say, 3 years, and don't recall how any of it works, nor can I devote the time to re-learning. Do people have contact forms for sending/receiving messages? I want to pass along some information in the hope someone will add it to one of the Birmingham pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dglp (talk • contribs) 16:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, welcome back to Wikipedia, firstly! One way of contacting a Wikipedia editor is through the way you just contacted me - their talk page. However, if the message you want to give them includes personal information then it may actually be better to send them an email. The way to do this is go onto their userpage and on the left hand menu, click on 'Email this user'. Not every user has this option as some wish to keep their email address private. After clicking on this, you can enter the message subject and the message itself. These are the two ways of contacting an editor that I know of.

Of course, as Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, you can add information to an article yourself. If it is not of a written standard that Wikipedia likes, other users can simply edit this to comply with WP:MOS. Remember, any material added to an article should be cited with web or book references (see WP:CITE for more). Happy editing! - Erebus555 19:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ayn Rand1.jpg is up for deletion (no source). See Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 November 27#Image:Ayn Rand1.jpg. I don't think you'll be able to help, but just in case... --- RockMFR 07:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Extragratis, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extragratis. Thank you. --Explodicle (talk) 21:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I know it was a long time ago, but I thought I'd drop you a line with a random fact - DYK that the same architects also designed The Gherkin building? Literally 1/5th of a mile from the willis building. Hencetalk (talk) 12:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Fosters and Partners are prolific architects are quite in demand so this fact doesn't surprise me! But I suppose you can have too much of one architect sometimes. Anyway, thanks for the fact! - Erebus555 (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Good job on Upolu Point. —Viriditas | Talk 13:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

You created the article Blake Basin but the article contains no assertion of notability and may be eligible for speedy deletion under WP:CSD, Article criteria 7. I have tagged the article with {{subst:dated|notability}}, but will hold off on tagging it with a db tag for now.--CastAStone/^/(talk) 23:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I have read WP, and see no reason why this content cannot be added. I'm sorry if you find it offensive in anyway, but the information is valid. It is available on the web, it is not libellous or malicious, it is in the interests of public information. Feel free to report as you wish. You should read the WP section on censorship. Also, the note stating that if you do not wish your articles to be altered, then do not write them. The possible reasons for people removing this section are extremely dubious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovekimp (talk • contribs) 23:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

The content is non-notable. It is nothing to do with me finding it offensive, and neither do I claim to own the article. I didn't even write the article. That is all. - Erebus555 (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

It looks like you live near to me in Pype Hayes. I’ve also had it up to here with officious Wikis and unjustified blocks]. Perhaps we could get together some time. That type of trouble has put me off lexicography. Barbara Shack (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

u do this to have fun?????? why did u edit the panthers site when it is true that they rubbish and shouldnt be in the bbl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.32.119.24 (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Because it was opinionated and does not represent a neutral point of view. Also it was poorly written and unreferenced. If you wish to edit properly, then register an account and read the help pages into how to write an article or to edit articles to Wikipedia standards. Thanks for the encouraging comment. - Erebus555 (talk) 19:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You edited, Birmingham City Centre and commented that the City Centre Core is not the same as the old city centre. Please sort out the City Centre Core article.Barbara Shack (talk) 08:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I’ve tried to edit User talk:Oosoom several times. Each time I get blocked and get accused of adding spam. There are no links in my comment. I’ve had no trouble with other Wikipedia edits. There’s been the same trouble with my computer at home and with an IT Centre computer on a totally different network. It looks like the problem is with Wikipedia computers. My comment wasn’t important but the blockage is. I fear anybody who tries to contact Oosoom from any computer network will get the same trouble. I mentioned the "Floozie" several times. Perhaps the computer mistook that for porn spammers. I was discussing the floozie in Victoria Square.Barbara Shack (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Refer to the fountain by it's official name - "The River" - and see if that works. If it doesn't then I'll have a go myself. - Erebus555 (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

“Man sagt, dass Großbritannien ohne die industrielle Kapazität von Birmingham den Krieg wohl verloren hätte.“
It is said that without the industrial capacity of Birmingham Britain would have lost the war.
I found the German text in German Wikipedia, here Below the text is my translation. You reverted it before I had time to write the reference. I don’t know if the German text is accurate or not. Therefore I wrote “perhaps decisively” I added the German text accidentally. It was in the word document I used.I've added the reference to the discussion page. Barbara Shack(talk) 17:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Return Of The Dragon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Number 13, February 2, 2008

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of January 2008.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Storm of the month

Cyclone Gene formed on January 26 over the open south Pacific Ocean. It drifted southward, and strengthened into Tropical Storm Gene on January 28 as it moved across the Fijian archipelago. There, it brought heavy rainfall, which caused the worst flooding in several years. Half of the country was left without power, and the cyclone killed seven people in Fiji. The storm turned southwestward, developing a cloud-filled eye and quickly strengthening by the end of the month.

Other tropical cyclone activity

• One tropical cyclone formed in the Western North Pacific Ocean west of The Philippines, which was analyzed by Japan Meteorological Agency as a depression; it tracked southwestward and did not significantly affect any land areas.
• In addition to Cyclone Gene, Tropical Storm Elisa and Cyclone Fuma occurred in the South Pacific ocean during the month, along with three tropical depressions.
• The only tropical cyclone in Australian region during the month was Tropical Cyclone Helen, which struck Australia.
• Four tropical cyclones, three of which named, existed in the Southwest Indian Ocean during the month. The most notable was Cyclone Fame, which caused twelve deaths after striking Madagascar.

Member of the month

The January member of the month is Ajm81. A tropical cyclone editor since he first joined in October 2005, Ajm81 plays a vital role in the project. Unlike other editors, who mainly edit articles, Ajm81 maintains and updates the track maps across the project. We thank Ajm81 for his timely contributions, and may he have some well-deserved downtime after the last tropical cyclone report is released.

New and improved articles

• There were six new pieces of Featured content : 2003 Atlantic hurricane season, List of storms in the 2003 Atlantic hurricane season, List of North Carolina hurricanes (pre-1900), 1983 Atlantic hurricane season, 1988 Atlantic hurricane season, and Hurricane Lane (2006)
• New Good articles include: Hurricane Cleo, Hurricane Gracie, 1821 Norfolk and Long Island hurricane
• New storm articles include: Tropical Storm Danielle (1980), Hurricane Elida (2002), Cyclone Elita, Cyclone Indlala
• New non-storm articles include: 2006 central Pacific cyclone, List of United States hurricanes

Main Page content

• Entries from 8 articles: Hurricane Ava (1973), Cyclone Inigo, Hurricane Greg (1999), Hurricane Henri (1979), Hurricane Kenneth (2005), Hurricane Elida (2002), Cyclone Elita, and Hurricane Naomi (1968) appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during January.

Storm article statistics

Grade	Oct	Nov	Dec	Jan
FA	30	31	33	33
A	9	8	9	9
GA	106	109	112	114
B	78	82	86	99
Start	212	211	208	214
Stub	5	6	6	3
Total	440	447	454	472
ω	3.02	3.01	2.98	2.98
percentage Less than B	49.3	48.5	47.1	46.0

Wikiwork and 1000 articles In January 2008, the WikiProject began using a system called Wikiwork, or ω. It weighs the overall quality of the project's articles, and a lower number means a greater total quality. The weighed ω, as used above, is a relative number that can be used to compare groups of this article. As of this publication, the relative ω of the project is 3.404, corresponding to between Start and B class. However, when limiting it solely to storm articles, the number drops to 2.98, which is slightly better than B class. During the month, a new statistics page was created.

Additionally, during the month, Mitchazenia pointed out that we received our 1,000th article with the creation of Cyclone Elita.

♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Template:Erebus555-contrib requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Green Lane Masjid, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Green Lane Masjid. EmmetCaulfield (talk) 08:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I would be grateful if you would check the login tourism link at the bottom of the "West Midlands (region)" page. I deleted, because I thought it was spam, but now someone has put this link back again. Opinion needed. There may be other instances of this link on other pages. Snowman (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Template:User webcam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello there! Just thought I ought to let you know about the new List of tallest buildings and structures in Salford article. I believe (from memory) you have an interest in this field and might want to take a look/ammend accordingly. Hope that helps, -- Jza84 · (talk) 13:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Coventry was started today with a basic project page. How can it be incorporated on the West Midlands wikiproject page? Are you going to propose a project for Birmingham? Snowman (talk) 21:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

On the West Midlands WikiProject page, it may be an idea to create a subsection called "Sub-Projects" or something along those lines. Beneath it, you can link to the Coventry WikiProject and give a couple of sentences on the scope and goals of the project.

I am actually glad that you have proposed the Coventry WikiProject and managed to get it through to creation as I had initially suggested creating one for Birmingham. However, after discussions with other editors, the decision was taken to propose and eventually create the West Midlands WikiProject. So, hopefully, the creation of the Coventry WikiProject will give enough justification for the creation of a Birmingham WikiProject. However, at the moment I am quite busy and don't have the time at the moment to create a Birmingham WikiProject. - Erebus555 (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Your encouragement is appreciated. You could mention a possible Birmingham project in the "Sub-project" section on the WMP page. Snowman (talk) 22:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Number 14, March 1, 2008

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of February 2008.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Storm of the month

Cyclone Ivan formed on February 7 and subsequently executed a loop to the west-southwest. Encountering favorable conditions, it strengthened to attain peak winds on February 17 before striking northeastern Madagascar. It degenerated into a remnant low pressure area as it crossed the island, and briefly re-organized into a weak tropical depression before dissipating on February 22. Ivan caused heavy damage in Madagascar, leaving 190,000 people homeless and causing over 83 deaths.

Other tropical cyclone activity

• In the South Pacific ocean, Cyclone Gene persisted from the previous month; a tropical depression also occurred in the month.
• Tropical Cyclone Nicholas was the only named storm during the month in the Australian region, which struck Western Australia. Two tropical lows occurred during the month, the latter of which later formed into Tropical Cyclone Ophelia.
• Four storms occurred in the Southwest Indian Ocean, including two from the previous month and the aforementioned Cyclone Ivan. Cyclone Hondo became the strongest cyclone worldwide in the month, and after becoming extratropical it regenerated over ten days later about 1750 miles (2800 km) to its west-northwest.

Member of the month

The February member of the month is RattleMan, for his lasting dedication and continual support of the project. During February, the user worked on improving the timeline articles for the previous season. RattleMan often updates the sections on storms in season articles, and helps to maintain the southern hemisphere articles.

New and improved articles

• There were 6 new pieces of Featured content : Hurricane Felix (featured picture), Hurricane Isis (1998), Tropical Storm Alberto (2006), Hurricane John (2006), Tropical cyclone, and Hurricane Isabel (featured picture)
• New Good articles include: Hurricane Gracie, Hurricane Ava (1973), Hurricane Flossy (1956)
• New storm articles include: 1935 Yankee hurricane, Hurricane Ginny, Cyclone Agni, 1917 Pinar del Río hurricane
• New non-storm articles include: List of North Carolina hurricanes (1950-1979)

Main Page content

• Today's Featured Article: Hurricane Isis (1998) appeared on the Main Page in the Today's Featured Article on February 15
• Entries from 3 articles: Hurricane Naomi (1968), Hurricane Darby (1992), and Hurricane Hernan (2002) appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during February.

Storm article statistics

Grade	Nov	Dec	Jan	Feb
FA	31	33	33	36
A	8	9	9	8
GA	109	112	114	123
B	82	86	99	96
Start	211	208	214	216
Stub	6	6	3	6
Total	447	454	472	485
ω	3.01	2.98	2.98	2.96
percentage Less than B	48.5	47.1	46.0	45.8
percentage GA or better	33.1	33.9	33.1	34.3

Improvements During the month, a total of 15 new articles were added, though the net increase in start or stub articles was only three. The highest quality set of articles for a basin is for the Eastern Pacific Ocean, of which half of its articles are either a good article or better; all of its retired storm articles are good or better. However, the basin has a lower total number of articles, and the Atlantic basin has a higher overall total of good articles.

There is a drive to increase the number of featured topics, which is located on the project talk page.

♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Number 15, April 5, 2008

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of March 2008.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Storm of the month

Cyclone Jokwe was the first tropical cyclone to make landfall in Mozambique since Cyclone Favio struck in the previous year. The tenth named storm of the 2007-08 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season, Jokwe was first classified as a tropical depression on March 2 over the open Southwest Indian Ocean. It tracked west-southwest, crossing northern Madagascar as a tropical storm on March 5 before intensifying into a tropical cyclone on March 6. Jokwe rapidly intensified to reach peak winds of 195 km/h (120 mph), before weakening slightly and striking Nampula Province in northeastern Mozambique. It quickly weakened while paralleling the coastline, though the storm restrengthened as it turned southward in the Mozambique Channel. Late in its duration, it remained nearly stationary for several days, and steadily weakened due to wind shear before dissipating on March 16.

The storm caused minor damage in northern Madagascar. In Mozambique, the cyclone affected 165,000 people, and left at least sixteen fatalities. Cyclone Jokwe destroyed over 9,000 houses and damaged over 3,000 more, with the heaviest damage in Angoche and the Island of Mozambique in Nampula Province. The storm also caused widespread power outages and crop damages.

Other tropical cyclone activity

• There were no named tropical cyclones in the South Pacific ocean, though a tropical depression developed near Vanuatu in the third week of the month.
• Late in the month, Cyclone Pancho developed in the Australian region, reaching peak winds of 90 knots. In addition, Cyclone Ophelia lasted from late February through early March.
• In addition to Cyclone Jokwe, there were two named tropical cyclones in the Southwest Indian Ocean; Cyclone Kamba became an Intense Tropical Cyclone over open waters, and Tropical Storm Lola formed and dissipated near Mauritius late in the month.

Member of the month

The March member of the month is CapeVerdeWave, whose first edit was to a tropical cyclone article, back in January 2006. CapeVerdeWave has been a steady and active member of the project, writing several articles on Category 5 hurricanes as well as working on the often forgotten older hurricanes. The user also has contributed to some older season articles, and recently helped update the project after the recent hurricane re-analysis. We thank him for his continued dedication.

New members

Southern Illinois SKYWARN Milk's Favorite Cookie Somerset Squall Stormtracker94

WBOSITG Jj137 Joan97

New and improved articles

• There were 6 new pieces of Featured content : Typhoon Paka, List of wettest tropical cyclones in the United States, Effects of Hurricane Ivan in the Lesser Antilles and South America, List of retired Pacific typhoon names (JMA), Tropical Storm Vamei, and List of New York hurricanes
• New Good articles include: Hurricane Beulah, Hurricane Ione, Hurricane Isidore
• New storm articles include: 1945 Southeast Florida hurricane, Hurricane Fox (1952)
• New non-storm articles include: Effects of Hurricane Dennis in Florida, List of North Carolina hurricanes (1900-1949)

Main Page content

• Today's Featured Article: 1933 Atlantic hurricane season appeared on the Main Page in the Today's Featured Article on March 27
• Entries from 1 article: 1917 Pinar del Río hurricane appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during March.

Storm article statistics

Grade	Dec	Jan	Feb	Mar
FA	33	33	36	38
A	9	9	8	8
GA	112	114	123	130
B	86	99	96	91
Start	208	214	216	211
Stub	6	3	6	9
Total	454	472	485	487
ω	2.98	2.98	2.96	2.94
percentage Less than B	47.1	46.0	45.8	45.2
percentage GA or better	33.9	33.1	34.3	36.1

Project News: Updates on the Best Track - Atlantic and North Indian Ocean, and more
In February, the Hurricane Research Division released its reanalysis for the Atlantic Ocean from 1915 to 1920. Highlights include the addition of eight storms, as well as the removal of one storm. The winds in the 1919 Florida Keys Hurricane were increased to 130 knots, and the 1916 Texas hurricane was increased to a Category 4 hurricane.

According to an email sent to the India Meteorological Department, there will be an online version of the North Indian Ocean best track from 1877 to 2006, scheduled to be released in two months; it is unknown if it will cost money to access.

In unrelated news, the project was featured on the Signpost; Mitchazenia was interviewed, and talked about the past, present, and future of the project.

At the end of the month, there were five different Featured content candidates (FXC's) by five different editors; two were featured article candidates, two were featured list candidates, and one was a featured picture candidate. The have been a few times in which there were four FXC's from four different editors, most recently in February and early March of 2008.

♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi - as requested, I've created {{Ofsted}}, so {{Ofsted}} will now give you:

Ofsted details for unique reference number 51359. Warofdreams talk 01:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, it is very much appreciated! It will be very useful on something I am working on! - Erebus555 (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Number 16, May 3, 2008

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all of April 2008.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Storm of the month

Typhoon Neoguri was the earliest tropical cyclone on record to strike China. It formed on April 13 to the east of the Philippines, and once entering the South China Sea, environmental conditions allowed for quick strengthening. Neoguri attained its peak intensity of 150 km/h (90 mph) as it approached the island of Hainan, though rapidly weakened due to unfavorable conditions. The system made landfall in southern China on April 19, causing three deaths and moderate damage totaling over ¥296 million (2008 RMB, $42 million 2008 USD). The typhoon left 40 fishermen missing in the South China Sea.

Other tropical cyclone activity

• A weak tropical depression formed near New Caledonia in the South Pacific ocean early in the month, and another tropical depression developed in the basin later in the month.
• Two named storms formed in the Australian region during the month, including Tropical Cyclone Durga, which was the first ever cyclone named by the Tropical Cyclone Warning Centre in Jakarta, Indonesia. Tropical Cyclone Rosie co-existed with Durga for much of its duration.
• Cyclone Nargis developed in the North Indian Ocean late in the month, and reached its peak intensity early in May; further details will be covered in the next newsletter.

Member of the month

The April member of the month is VOFFA. Though not officially a project member, VOFFA is an important user to the project, having maintained and updated the talk page archives on tropical cyclones worldwide; activity includes adding warnings and discussions for all storms. The user is particularly active during the off-season of the Atlantic basin, when article activity on tropical cyclones typically declines.

New members

Chetblong Qst

Cyclonebiskit Pilover819

New and improved articles

• There were six new pieces of Featured content : Cyclone Elita, List of North Carolina hurricanes (1900-1949), Tropical Storm Barry (2007), List of North Carolina hurricanes, Lists of North Carolina hurricanes (FT), and Image:KatrinaNewOrleansFlooded edit2.jpg
• New Good articles include: Tropical Storm Fay (2002), 2006 Atlantic hurricane season, 1939 California tropical storm
• New storm articles include: Hurricane Ileana (2006), Hurricane Madeline (1998), Hurricane Lester (1998)
• New non-storm articles include: Hurricane Ivan tornado outbreak, Timeline of the 2008 Pacific typhoon season

Main Page content

• Entries from 9 articles: Effects of Hurricane Dennis in Alabama, Effects of Hurricane Dennis in Georgia, Cyclone Jokwe, Effects of Hurricane Dennis in Mississippi, Tropical Storm Arthur (1996), Cyclone Gamede, Cyclone Glenda, Hurricane Cosme (2007), and Typhoon Neoguri (2008) appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during April.

Storm article statistics

Grade	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr
FA	33	36	38	40
A	9	8	8	8
GA	114	123	130	131
B	99	96	91	103
Start	214	216	211	208
Stub	3	6	9	9
Total	472	485	487	499
ω	2.98	2.96	2.94	2.92
percentage Less than B	46.0	45.8	45.2	43.5
percentage GA or better	33.1	34.3	36.1	35.9

Project News
There is discussion on the status of articles on non-notable storms in the Merging page of the project. Comments are welcome.

A Wikipedia traffic counter was launched earlier this year. In the month of February, the article on Hurricane Katrina was viewed just over 200,000 times, making the article the 496th most viewed article on the English Wikipedia during the month.

During the month, Hurricane Camille was demoted from GA status, continuing the trend of good articles degrading in status on notable storms; other occurrences include the FA removal of Cyclone Tracy and 1900 Galveston Hurricane. If anyone has any ideas how to fix the problem, feedback and ideas are appreciated.

♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Good luck elsewhere within wikipedia and life. Thegreatdr (talk) 13:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

There is no need to replace assessdates as you did on "Woodway Park School and Community College‎". Accessdaymonth and accessyear are used on some FA's and sometimes it is written in scratch format; it is clearer which is the day and which is the month. I understand that the wiki MOS specifies that no particular ref style is preferable as long there is consistency. Snowman (talk) 16:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Today I attended a meeting in meat space, (Offline). The speaker said that Big Brum was originally a fire tower. I added that to the article with “Citation needed”. Please check.

I haven’t abandoned Wikipedia. There were threats to stalk me online. |’ve decided to phase out use of my real name. I started a second Wikipedia account with a different username. I’m not trying to hide this from the admins. Checkuser will find my second account easily.Barbara Shack (talk) 18:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Big Brum was never a fire tower and wasn't designed to be one either. The original plans for Big Brum by Thomason clearly show that it was intended to be a clocktower. It may be possible that the speaker was actually referring to the clock tower at Sutton Coldfield Town Hall as this was a fire tower before becoming a clock tower.

It's good to see you're still around! There have been many Birmingham editors who appearing, do a raft of edits and then disappear again and I was starting to think that you were one of them! - Erebus555 (talk) 19:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm Proxima Centauri 2Barbara Shack (talk) 08:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Why doesn't Google give prominence to the article on Birmingham City Centre that you helped to develop? I think that article is better than many commercial websites that are on the front page of Google. It could be worth taking that up. Proxima Centauri 2 (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC

Can Google be persuaded not to put commercial interests first? Proxima Centauri 2 (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC) )

Google doesn't have any control on what comes up on a search, unless it is a dangerous site and they are asked to remove it. Wikipedia's evergrowing popularity could mean that some people, who are searching for information on Birmingham City Centre, will refer to Wikipedia first before searching on Google. Plus, when they search Google for Birmingham City Centre, the article for Birmingham is still within the top 10 returned results. - Erebus555 (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

You are an editor of Chicago Spire with at least 10 edits on the article. There is currently a debate regarding the propriety of whether buildings under construction should be eligible to be GAs at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)/1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Do you understand the co-ordinate display system - I see our enthusiastic geo-locator is on an enforced vacation. If you look at Dorridge there are two overlayed co-ordinates, and I am not sure how it has managed that. Thought you might have seen this before or could point me in the right direction. Dogbiscuit (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, when you see something like this on an article, it means that there are two sets of coordinates somewhere in the article. As there is an infobox, that means one set of coordinates are in that. Those should remain as they actually help put the little marker on the map. The other set of coordinates are usually found at the top of the article (which in this case they are not) or at the bottom of the article in the External links section (which they are here). They are usually in a template beginning with 'coor'. Just remove this from the article in the edit box and it will be sorted whilst having no detrimental effects to the quality of the article. I will remove the coordinates from the Dorridge article just so you can see what to do! Hope that helps. If not, feel free to ask again! - Erebus555 (talk) 19:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Consider me taught to fish! Dogbiscuit (talk) 11:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Since you expressed an opinion recently at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)/1, I thought you might want to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi - I've just created a category for Erdington - see Category:Erdington. I've put in a few obvious articles, but any other suggestions you have would be welcome. Do you think articles like Gravelly Hill Interchange should be included, or would you consider that outside the area? I like the article on Lad in the Lane by the way! —  Tivedshambo  _(t/c) 19:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the comments on the Lad in the Lane article! I felt it was necessary to get rid of some red links in the Architecture of Birmingham article. As for the category, I think it is a good idea. I think the category should cover the scope of the Parliamentary constituency/ Council constituency to avoid confusion over the boundaries. This would mean including Stockland Green and Kingstanding and would also make the inclusion of Gravelly Hill Interchange possible. Also, I think an article for the Highcroft Hospital is due. There is a lot of information out there and the sub-section is only going to get bigger! Might be worth creating an article for Erdington Hall too - although, I don't know how much information is available on the net about it. - Erebus555 (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look at this article and fixing citations etc. I'm slowly going through it sorting it all out (and adding detail where appropriate), so your recent work on that is really helpful! It's getting closer to being a decent article, but there's so much of it that's unreferenced that it's quite a big job. Fingerpuppet (talk) 09:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I noticed that a lot of work had been done to it since I last looked at it! It is looking good so far! Soon, the article will need subarticles - especially for transport and history. - Erebus555 (talk) 13:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi - just to let you know I've made a start on a couple of articles that are in your "Articles I Want" list - Island House (Birmingham) and Bassetts Pole. Also, I've been coming across a load of your stuff in Google Earth recently (well, for the last few years!) - keep up the good work! Booglamay (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I was looking at your talk page. "Handsworth station", was opened 14/10/1854 as Handsworth and Smethwick railway station. It was renamed Handsworth station by BRB; and it closed on 6 March 1972. The station listed as "Handsworth station" on the Wikipedia:WikiProject West Midlands/Article requests, appears to be Handsworth Wood railway station. Possibly it is Handsworth Wood station that you are wanting, not Handsworth?Pyrotec (talk) 19:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Aah yes, I think it would be Handsworth Wood station. When I wrote that, I wasn't as familiar with Birmingham's defunct stations as I am now! There are a few things I could do with fixing, thinking about it now! Thanks for bringing that up! - Erebus555 (talk) 19:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

...and for updating my schools page :) --Stuartjmanton (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey Erebus,

Just thought you would be useful helping me out with The Sway DaSafo article. Please could you add a section called collaborations, detailing Sway's past collaborations with other artists. Also it would be helpful for you to add a "This is My Demo" section, which would hold info about the album. P.S: I'm sorry this notice has been a bit out of the blue, but as you occasionally edit Sway's Wiki & have some knowledge I thought this could be a good task to help me on.

Thanks Dirtyharry1994 (talk) 08:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I think the collaborations section should go in the discography article, as most collaborations produce a single at least. Also, I don't think there is any need for a This Is My Demo section considering there is already an article on it! The problem with expanding the article is that there are very few references out there on the internet at the moment. So, whatever is put on the article usually ends up with a Cite tag. As it stands, I think the article is fine at the moment. Until the release of the Signature LP, I don't think it can be expanded much further as there will be a lot of hype when the album is released. The discography article is in need of expansion though. A section on singles released by Sway needs to be included and may be a section on tracks that he has produced - if there are any. - Erebus555 (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

As part of the Motorcycling WikProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes and sorting out all the manufacturers with an infobox etc. I've just replaced your redirect of Ariel Motorcycles and linked it as main to the section in Ariel (vehicle) - when you have a moment please will you have a look at how the two can fit together more comfortably? I considered removing the list of models but I suppose it doesn't matter, as I found what must be the definitive list on the Australian web site. Cheers Tony (talk) 16:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, I've gone through the article and fixed some bits and bobs to do with the structure and style. I've incorporated the link into the lead of the article, although I am still convinced it could be better placed. It might be best to refer to the editors at the Motorcycling WikiProject who will undoubtedly have more experience than me with articles in this particular field! Happy editing. - Erebus555 (talk) 17:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

It seems User:Pigsonthewing has done a bit more work to the lead and the link seems to be incorporated better now! - Erebus555 (talk) 17:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.

When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.

If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Check out WP:SPO merge proposal. 20:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I have raised some concerns at Talk:Birmingham Redevelopment Scheme#Rename and repurpose?, to which you might like to respond. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 15:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Natwest House Bham.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:NatWestTowerBirmingham.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:NatWestTowerBirmingham.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Birmingham Wheel.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Birmingham -wheel -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Alpha Tower 1.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Alpha Tower -Birmingham -UK (1).JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Alpha tower.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Alpha Tower -Birmingham -UK (2).JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:BT Tower after paint.JPG is now available as Commons:File:BT Tower repainted -Birmingham -UK (1).JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:DSCF0633.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Holloway Circus Tower -rear -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:British Telecoms Tower, Brum repaint.JPG is now available as Commons:File:BT Tower repainted -Birmingham -UK (2).JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:DSCF0637.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Centre City Tower -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Orion Building ground level.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Orion Building -ground level -Birminghan -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Edmundstreet recent development.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Edmund Street -development -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Ikon Gallery (bham).JPG is now available as Commons:File:Ikon Gallery -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:JurysInnBham.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Jurys Inn -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Orion and Holloway.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Orion and Holloway Buildings Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Quayside Tower Birmingham.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Quayside Tower -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Mclarenb1.JPG is now available as Commons:File:McLaren Building -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Orion Building.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Orion Building -Birmingham -UK(2).JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Mclarenb2.JPG is now available as Commons:File:The McLaren Building -Birmingham -UK(2).jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:MasshouseblockM.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Masshouse block M -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Hyatt hotel birmingham.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Hyatt Regency -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Belmont Row works after fire.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Belmont Row works -after fire -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Ventureast, Birmingham demolition work.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Ventureast -demolition work -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:1SnowHillPlazaBirmingham.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Snow Hill Plaza -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:NTIBirmingham.JPG is now available as Commons:File:New Technology Institute -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:New Street, Birmingham looking towards Town Hall.jpg is now available as Commons:File:New Street -looking west -Birmingham -UK.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:MillenniumPointFront.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Millennium Point -front -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:ImaxTheatreBirmingham.JPG is now available as Commons:File:IMAX theatre -Millennium Point -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Curzon Park development site.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Curzon Park -development site -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:ICC Birmingham Entrance.JPG is now available as Commons:File:International Convention Centre -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Curzon Street Station plaque.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Curzon Street Station plaque -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:PallasadesBirminghamlogo.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Pallasades Shopping Centre -logo -Birmingham -UK.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

File:MasshouseBirminghampromo.JPG is described by you as a photograph of promotional material. in which case, I think that it is almost certainly has a copyright held by the authors. I think it needs a fair use rational to be used on the "Masshouse" page. Snowman (talk) 14:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I've split the Tony Hatch article into sections, as you suggested on the discussion board, though not as many as would have been necessary from a "visual" point of view. I did not want to re-write the article in any way (since I know virtually nothing about the subject), so I had to make do with the opportunities for splitting which the current article offered. It is some form of progress, at least. I had hoped that you might find the time to replace my crappy section titles, for I failed to come up with useful ones.

Regards,

Otto von B (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. Back in 2007 you added the sentence Plans to construct basins at Lowesmore and Diglis were abandoned. A couple of us are puzzled, as there are basins at these places today. Do you have any further info? Pterre (talk) 13:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Greater Manchester Newsletter Issue XVI - June 2009 March issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Sorry there's not been a newsletter for three months, it's not that there hasn't been anything to say but that there almost hasn't been time to say it... On 20 March 2009 Manchester was "today's Featured Article" and received over 44,000 visitors. This was the culmination of about 2 years of effort from a lot of editors who found the article in this state before the founding of the project. Along with Greater Manchester, it's our flagship article and for it to reach the mainpage is a great achievement. It was an incredible collaborative effort and shows what the project is capable of, and since then we have gone from strength to strength. The Manchester Small-Scale Experimental Machine was Today's Featured Article on 30 May, with 33,000 visitors. Promoted articles: Carrington Moss is an 1,100 acres (450 ha) peat bog in Trafford; in the 19th century, it was reclaimed to be used agriculturally and for the disposal Manchester's waste, and is still used for farming. Manchester Mummy is about Hannah Beswick, whose macabre fear of being buried alive lead to her demanding that her body was kept above ground and checked periodically for signs of life. The Manchester Small-Scale Experimental Machinewas the world's first stored-program computer. It ran its first program on 21 June 1948. The SSEM was a template for the Manchester Mark 1 and the first in a series of groundbreaking computers designed at Manchester. The town of Sale in Trafford was probably founded in the Anglo-Saxon period and is best known as the home of physicist J. P. Joule the founding place and former home of and Sale Sharks rugby club. Cheadle Hulme is a suburb of Stockport that formed from several small hamlets, rather than growing around a church which was usual for medieval villages. (also Stockport's first GA!) The East Lancashire Railway 1844–1859 (ELR) only operated for 16 years, but in its short history it was threatened by competitors such as the North Union Railway, and was involved in a dangerous stand-off with the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR). Eventually the ELR and L&YR were amalgamated in 1859. Eccles, famous for the Eccles cake, is a town in the City of Salford that boomed with the Industrial Revolution. Along with Worsley, it is a proposed World Heritage Site. Mellor hill fort is the only Iron Age hill fort in Greater Manchester and was only discovered in the 1990s. Partington, in Trafford, is a town and civil parish that was until the Manchester Ship Canal opened in 1894, a mainly agrarian community. With the opening of the canal, Partington became a major coal port and following the Second World War was expanded as an overspill estate for deprived parts of Manchester. The town of Worsley was home to the Duke of Bridgewater's coal mines and is under consideration to be preserved as a World Heritage Site; the duke built the Bridgewater Canal to transport coal from the mines. Manchester computers, Emma (1828 ship), Carrington Moss, Greater Manchester bus route 192, and Mellor hill fort have all featured in the DYK section of the front page since the start of March. For details of the DYKs by the project that have appeared on the main page, see Did you know? With all the project's success, we must be careful not to become complacent. In March, David Beckham was delisted as a Good Article because it lacked enough references and was poorly written in parts. Improving an article and getting it reviewed for GA is a lot of effort and it's a real shame to see the article delisted, but a reminder that our role as an article writer is two-fold: once we improve them, we have an obligation to maintain them. Beckham is the kind of person who is regularly in the news, so the article will get a lot of attention and need regular updating, and it was written by members of WP:FOOTBALL, but let's take it as a reminder of what's needed from us. WT:GM: The project's talk page is a forum for discussion and to keep up to date with the latest project developments and initiatives put it on your watchlist! Recently there have been discussions on articles to be deleted, the congestion charge, how to get members involved and working together, and plenty of other stuff. Written by Nev1, based on a template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:GM?? Please nominate yourself at WT:GM! New editors are always welcome! Aims Our extant short-term project aims: Obtain GA status for Salford. Obtain GA status for Stockport Obtain GA status for Kersal Moor. Obtain GA status for Manchester city centre. Obtain GA status for Congestion charging in Greater Manchester and Greater Manchester Transport Innovation Fund (TiF). Get a lead/static image in every infobox of every town in the county. Over the past three months, we've succeeded in our aims of bringing Eccles and Worsley to GA status, thanks largely to the seemingly inexhaustible Parrot of Doom. Recently another aim was added: bringing Stockport to GA standard. It's currently C-class and has some well developed sections. It will be a difficult task, but worthwhile considering it's Greater Manchester's third largest settlement. Also, the importance of bringing Salford to GA has been emphasised; it's currently B-class and should be the easiest of our aims to accomplish, although it's been there for a long time. Let's see if we can put this one to rest soon. The project compared Over the past three months, WP:LOND and WP:YORK have had a massive upsurge in the number of articles under their auspices. And interestingly, WP:YORKS has had an upsurge in GAs (10), and WP:LOND has had an increase in both GAs and FAs (8 and 10 respectively), closing down the gap with WP:GM. Although WP:DERB appears to have lost a GA, one of their articles was incorrectly tagged; however Derwent Valley Mills is being prepared to become a Good Article candidate, and hopefully will be the project's first. With the recent retirement of Ddstretch and Espresso Addict, WP:CHES has lost two of its most active contributors, but is still managing to produce good articles such as list of castles in Cheshire (FL) and John Douglas (now a Good Article candidate). The majority of WP:MRSY's articles are now assessed and will hopefully go from strength to strength.   GTRM LOND YORK MRSY CHES DERB FA 38 25 23 8 4 0 A 0 1 0 0 1 0 GA 44 35 42 12 23 0 B 105 225 193 31 83 37 C 113 55 238 104 66 71 Start 731 1817 2142 528 530 482 Stub 771 1229 3603 421 455 702 List 48 75 103 20 28 24 Unassessed 0 2821 0 463 0 0 Total 1850 6344 6344 1587 1190 1316 Member News There are now 48 active members of WikiProject Greater Manchester (with a further 17 members inactive since 1 September 2008) as 2 new members have joined the project since the start of March: Juliancolton Sharadjalota456 The project is always looking for new members, and if you spot an editor who makes good changes to Greater Manchester related articles why not invite them to join up by adding this template to their talk page: {{SUBST:Welcome WPGM}}. Reminders... Images! There are some good images around, but more are still needed if we're going to get a "lead/static image in every infobox of every town in the county"! The requested photographs category lists some of the articles needing images. Articles needing attention Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion and the list of articles needing cleanup are in permanent need of attention.

Nev1 (talk) 13:41, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Have you got anything on Sydenham, a mainly residential area of Leamington Spa, which may have been wrongly placed at Sydenham, Warwickshire, rather than being at Sydenham, Leamington. It was recently merged with Leamington, but I am considering re-establishing the article again. see merge discussion at Talk:Sydenham, Warwickshire. Snowman (talk) 10:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Greater Manchester Newsletter Issue XVII - July 2009 June issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Promoted articles: Cheadle Hulme is a suburb of Stockport that formed from several small hamlets, rather than growing around a church which was usual for medieval villages, although there is evidence of activity dating back to the Bronze Age. The Cheadle Hulme railway station was opened in 1845 and was the second railway station in the settlement. June's DYK?: Did you know that after the collapse of the Broughton Suspension Bridge in 1831, the British military introduced the order to "break step" when soldiers were crossing a bridge? Featured on the Did you know? section on 6 June 2009. Other news: Recently Salford was turned into a disambiguation page with the article on the settlement moved to Salford, Greater Manchester. This will hopefully make it clearer to the reader that Salford, Greater Manchester, and the City of Salford are not the same thing. Just remember to specify which Salford next time you're adding a wikilink to an article! Although it wasn't technically this month, list of people from Wigan was created on 2 July, and any help populating the list with sourced names would be great. It's one of nine such list for the boroughs in Greater Manchester (Bury doesn't have a list yet) and they all need populating. There is currently a discussion on our project's importance scale which has been adopted by WP:YORKS, and what it should cover. Please feel free to join in, the more people are involved the better! Remember to be careful about editors claiming places are still in Lancashire, today I had to revert someone insisting that Leigh isn't in Greater Manchester and recently the Friends of Real Lancashire voiced their dislike of the Lancashire article so this issue isn't going to go away. Just remember that the project watchlist can help us catch vandalism and is worth checking from time to time. WT:GM: The project's talk page is a forum for discussion and to keep up to date with the latest project developments and initiatives put it on your watchlist! Recently there have been discussions on articles to be deleted, the congestion charge, how to get members involved and working together, and plenty of other stuff. Aims Our extant short-term project aims: Obtain GA status for Salford. Obtain GA status for Stockport Obtain GA status for Kersal Moor. Obtain GA status for Manchester city centre. Obtain GA status for Congestion charging in Greater Manchester and Greater Manchester Transport Innovation Fund (TiF). Get a lead/static image in every infobox of every town in the county. Recently another aim was added: bringing Stockport to GA standard. It's currently C-class and has some well developed sections. It will be a difficult task, but worthwhile considering it's Greater Manchester's third largest settlement. Also, the importance of bringing Salford to GA has been emphasised; it's currently B-class and should be the easiest of our aims to accomplish, although it's been there for a long time. Let's see if we can put this one to rest soon. Member News No new members joined the project in June and there are 45 active members of WikiProject Greater Manchester (with a further 20 members inactive since 1 January 2009). The project is always looking for new members, and if you spot an editor who makes good changes to Greater Manchester related articles why not invite them to join up by adding this template to their talk page: {{SUBST:Welcome WPGM}}. The project compared In June, WP:LON has a massive upsurge in the number of FAs, with some great work by Iridescent in promoting a swathe of bridge articles to FA. WP:YORKS has over taken WP:GM in terms of GAs, and for the first time since June 2008 (when WP:LON had the lead), WP:GM is not the project with most GAs. In June, the Derwent Valley Mills became a GA and is WP:DERBY's first GA although there are more likely candidates in the pipeline. WP:CHES continues to perform strongly considering it has few active editors, and in June John Douglas (architect) was promoted to FA and there is currently a FLC. In June, there was discussion at WT:MERSEY about how to generate more audited content (ie: GAs and FAs) and since then one article has been promoted to GA, there is one GAC and other articles being prepared for GAC.   GTRM LOND YORK MRSY CHES DERB FA 39 32 24 8 5 0 A 0 1 0 0 1 0 GA 44 32 45 12 23 1 B 106 230 191 32 88 37 C 115 59 246 108 71 71 Start 740 1823 2211 605 528 485 Stub 771 1236 3688 498 454 707 List 52 80 132 23 29 25 Unassessed 0 2825 1 305 0 1 Total 1867 6318 6538 1591 1199 1327 Reminders... Images! There are some good images around, but more are still needed if we're going to get a "lead/static image in every infobox of every town in the county"! The requested photographs category lists some of the articles needing images. Articles needing attention Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion and the list of articles needing cleanup are in permanent need of attention. Written by Nev1, based on a template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:GM?? Please nominate yourself at WT:GM! New editors are always welcome!

Nev1 (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, Erebus555! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –pjoef (talk • contribs) 17:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Greater Manchester Newsletter Issue XVIII - August 2009 July issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Promoted articles: Salford is Greater Manchester's second city (although it is the wider district which has city status), but for most of its history it was larger and more important than Manchester. The Salford Quays area will become the home of CBBC and BBC Sport in 2011. The Peak District was the first national park in Britain and spans Cheshire, Derbyshire, Greater Manchester, South Yorkshire, Staffordshire, and West Yorkshire. It was used by the Dam Busters and used as a location for the film based on the story. Other news: There's been a lot of article activity in the last month, especially in Wigan-related pages. Wigan is the only borough in Greater Manchester without a GA or FA to its name, and it would be great if this could change. A lot of work has been put into Tyldesley, any and help to get it to GA would be great. There's also been a high-profile new article created: media in Manchester. Pitch in on the talk page if you're interested! Just remember that the project watchlist can help us catch vandalism and is worth checking from time to time. WT:GM: The project's talk page is a forum for discussion and to keep up to date with the latest project developments and initiatives put it on your watchlist! Recently there have been discussions on articles to be deleted, the congestion charge, how to get members involved and working together, and plenty of other stuff. Aims Our extant short-term project aims: Obtain GA status for Stockport. Obtain GA status for Kersal Moor. Obtain GA status for Manchester city centre. Obtain GA status for Congestion charging in Greater Manchester and Greater Manchester Transport Innovation Fund (TiF). Get a lead/static image in every infobox of every town in the county. Last month, we achieved our long-standing aim of bringing Salford up to GA status. It's been a fine effort and perhaps we can concentrate on our other objectives, especially getting Stockport, the largest settlement article not to be at least B-class, to GA. Member News There are now 47 active members of WikiProject Greater Manchester (with a further 20 members inactive since 1 January 2009) as two new members have joined the project since the start of March: Sansonic (talk · contribs) J3Mrs (talk · contribs) J3Mrs has done some fine work on Wigan-related articles, especially Tyldesley so hopefully we can help him with his efforts. The project is always looking for new members, and if you spot an editor who makes good changes to Greater Manchester related articles why not invite them to join up by adding this template to their talk page: {{SUBST:Welcome WPGM}}. The project compared In July, WP:LON almost doubled in scope and now has over 12,000 articles – far more than any other UK county WikiProject. Last month, the Peak District was promoted to GA; the area is mainly in Derbyshire but covers several other counties and is a massive achievement for all involved. WP:CHES continues to perform strongly considering it has few active editors, with one FL promoted in July and another in the pipeline. WP:GM is still the leading UK county project in terms of FAs and by proportion of audited content (ie: GAs and FAs). A lot of effort has gone into producing this project's articles, so let's make sure we keep tags on them and that they don't degrade.   GTRM LOND YORK MRSY CHES DERB FA 39 36 25 8 6 0 A 0 2 0 0 1 0 GA 46 37 46 14 25 2 B 104 238 196 33 94 37 C 123 73 250 123 83 72 Start 769 1859 2252 669 530 490 Stub 815 3749 3768 564 456 712 List 56 81 136 25 28 25 Unassessed 0 6522 0 172 0 2 Total 1952 12597 6673 1608 1223 1340 Reminders... Images! There are some good images around, but more are still needed if we're going to get a "lead/static image in every infobox of every town in the county"! The requested photographs category lists some of the articles needing images. Articles needing attention Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion and the list of articles needing cleanup are in permanent need of attention. Written by Nev1, based on a template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:GM?? Please nominate yourself at WT:GM! New editors are always welcome!

Nev1 (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey, just a quick hello from a fellow Skyscraper forumer. Been updating some more of the Birmingham University page with some additions to your own comments.

Cheers, Simon (feltip) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spfelton (talk • contribs) 01:09, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Hi Erebus555,
could it be that your account on Commons has been hacked? Though I don't know anything about your work here and little on Commons, todays actions of your account on Commons were so strange (compared to your earlier uploads) that they raised alert. From your account an explicit image was uploaded over an existing high-profile image of Stockholm, therefore guaranteeing wide distribution. Your comment would be welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I have not used my Commons account for quite a while. I have no idea what happened there; those were certainly not my edits. I'm very confused and concerned as to how the person got my password so I have changed it.

Thanks for pointing out what had happened though, I'll keep a closer eye on it over the next few weeks. Thank you. - Erebus555 (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Best would be to immediately try to change your password on Commons. If you can't log-in with your old one, you'll know for sure it has been compromised. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I have changed my password for my Commons account now, and for this account as both passwords were the same. It seems all the malicious edits were just to that particular image and nothing else has been done. - Erebus555 (talk) 19:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

The "problem" image (versions) have been deleted. However, in case you want to have totally removed the edits themselves from your user edit history, you would have to ask one of our oversighters. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello Erebus555! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Peter Corey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I have nominated Category:Geography of Birmingham, England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Geography of Birmingham (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Sway - Up Your Speed single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Hanriot-1-.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello Erebus555
I wondered what your thoughts were on the naming of various articles for districts of Birmingham that use a distinguisher to differentiate them from other places of the same name elsewhere? I only ask because I recently noticed that Nickyl had created a new article about California in Birmingham, but that he had done so under California, West Midlands. Whilst I’m far from being anywhere near an expert when it comes to Wikipedia’s name conventions, I was under the impression that the distinguisher should be the principal area, which in this case would be Birmingham. Consequently I moved the page to California, Birmingham, so that it would then be consistent with neighbouring district articles such as Quinton, Birmingham and Northfield, Birmingham (I have also similarly moved Woodgate, West Midlands to Woodgate, Birmingham for the same reasons). Looking at Category:Areas of Birmingham, West Midlands I see that there are 20 district articles that use “Birmingham” as a distinguisher, and 8 that use “West Midlands”. I therefore wonder if, for the sake of consistency, it might not be best to move the 8 articles that have “West Midlands” so that they have “Birmingham” instead? Knowing you are an active member with an interest in all things Brummagem, I would be grateful to hear you thoughts on this? Many thanks, best regards (Lepidus Magnus (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC))
P.S. Here are the 8 current “West Midlands” article:

• Bordesley, West Midlands
• Hamstead, West Midlands
• Handsworth, West Midlands
• Hockley, West Midlands
• Sheldon, West Midlands
• Stirchley, West Midlands
• West Heath, West Midlands
• Witton, West Midlands

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:E111.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Songs sign.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MasshouseBirminghampromo.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

This means you. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I see you haven't edited for a while. I hope you're OK.

You may be interested in http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/RBSA_Backstage_Pass

Hope to see you there. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi there Erebus555. You are registered with WikiProject Derbyshire and we are cleaning out our list of members. As you have not contributed to any page for over a year we have removed you as inactive. If you still want to participate in the project, just go back and add yourself again. Thank you. Rcsprinter (gas) @ 15:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi there Erebus555. You are registered with WikiProject West Midlands and we are cleaning our list of members. As you have not contributed to any page for over a year we have removed you as inactive. If you still want to participate in the project, just go back and move yourself into the active list. Thank you. Gavbadger (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

User:Erebus555/sandbox2, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Erebus555/sandbox2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Erebus555/sandbox2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 10:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Your upload of File:Capesanlucas.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

The article Sutton Coldfield Observer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no sources, I found nothing usable on Google.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 01:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shane Mack (mayor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Mack (mayor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pokerkiller (talk) 17:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Snow Hill 43 Storey tower render, Birmingham.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Ellisislandhallinside.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stade de france.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oneman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Erebus555. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The file File:Great Guana Cay Map.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Klee Passage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klee Passage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Poydoo can talk and edit 19:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Return Of The Dragon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SMC Hickton Madeley Architects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMC Hickton Madeley Architects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 10:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lake Shore Towers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Shore Towers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 00:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nike Total 90 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nike Total 90 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TarnishedPath^talk 02:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The article Alaban has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot verify that this place exists. Does not appear in governmental sources nor in maps

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)