User talk:EchetusXe

Archives

2008 2009 Part 1 & Part 2 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Lawrence (footballer, born 1889) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EchetusXe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to the Evening Standard was clearly evident and the signing has been comfirmed. Please read references before changing edits. 82.25.236.248 (talk) 13:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Devine is expected to join Plymouth. No official confirmation has been reported as of yet. Cheers. EchetusXe 14:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EchetusXe, hope you are having a good day there! I reverted your last edit on Alfie Devine's page because there was no edit summary and I went with the stats provided by soccerway.

Since you reverted it back to 20, I checked what happened during the last league match of Port Vale match and realized it was abandoned. I apologize for my mistake. Happy editing! Kokoeist (talk) 20:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah Soccerway have kept the abandoned game stats up? That is silly of them, but thanks for the explanation! EchetusXe 20:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Hi EchetusXe! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since last decline

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kian Breckin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 05:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, thanks for the work on the article, I removed the Derby County player of the year template as he did win a player of the year award for 2008, but he did not win the official Jack Stamps Trophy one. Every Derby County player of the year in the club's history - Derbyshire Live (derbytelegraph.co.uk) ParkingTheBus (talk) 02:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks EchetusXe 11:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Potteries derby you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Potteries derby you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Potteries derby and Talk:Potteries derby/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 07:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Potteries derby you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Potteries derby for comments about the article, and Talk:Potteries derby/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am just giving you the courtesy message that I have replied to your review on on my DYK nomination. Pings over there tend to be a bit dubious so I thought I'd leave this just in case you didn't see it. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 15:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Wayne Jacobs at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sims2aholic8 (talk) 10:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Andy Crosby you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andy Crosby you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Andy Crosby and Talk:Andy Crosby/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EchetusXe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keegan Hartley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andy Crosby you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andy Crosby for comments about the article, and Talk:Andy Crosby/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI... GiantSnowman 16:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ah man, thanks EchetusXe 17:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Billy Kellock (footballer, born 1954), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 07:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wayne Jacobs, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wayne Jacobs said that without football he would have been "dead by 30, or in prison"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wayne Jacobs. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wayne Jacobs), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Potteries derby, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one Potteries derby game was decided by a goal scored twelve seconds into the match? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Potteries derby. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Potteries derby), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not verified by a player's soccerway profile, so please stop adding it in. GiantSnowman 17:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop violating WP:NPOV which I have had to clean up e.g. here and here - neutral wording is not difficult. GiantSnowman 17:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logan Cousins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Cousins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarchOfTheGreyhounds 08:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Midnight Patrol.JPEG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. hinnk (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Rudge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 19:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Rudge you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:John Rudge for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 05:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was recently expanding the Jack Manners (footballer) article from info in the Hartlepool United: The Complete Record book. The book lists his DOB as 4 May 1880 but wiki previously listed it as 27 December 1877 with a link to the English National Football Archive. I do not have access to this and was wondering if you or any other editors did to check whether this is correct? If not, are there any other good sources for this sort of info from this period to double check which date is correct? All the best Michaeldble (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I don't have access to it now. I believe Struway does. EchetusXe 13:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Michaeldble (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your reversions of my edit on the Stanley Matthews article appear to be mistaken. I did not change the birth place parameter, I changed the death place parameter. Per the ODNB, Matthews died in North Staffordshire Nuffield Hospital in Newcastle-under-Lyme. He was born in Stoke, and I did not change that information.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 14:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah very well, I apologise. EchetusXe 17:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandro Da Costa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Hamstall Ridware has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]