User talk:Diddypartylover01

October 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CBS News. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brown catshark, you may be blocked from editing. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But they do eat that many humans. I seen it on the news. Diddypartylover01 (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pol-e Ushan. Frost 17:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is bullshit Diddypartylover01 (talk) 17:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Diddypartylover01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

your reason here Diddypartylover01 (talk) 18:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your block is valid, and apart from saying it is bullshit, you don't give a reason to unblock you, nor do you propose a new username. PhilKnight (talk) 19:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]