User talk:Chidie345

Hello! I'm here to edit.Chidie345 (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at LeToya Luckett. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know.Chidie345 (talk) 19:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is okay. Now you do. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pete Astudillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laredo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I made a edit mistake. Oops. Chidie345 (talk) 08:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fixed it. Chidie345 (talk) 08:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok now I got what you wanted to do, no prob. I re do it. Greetings. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 19:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was about to do it, however, I see that this is probably good since A.B. is the third one you know, A. B. Quintanilla III, since his father is Abraham Quintanilla II, and the father of Abraham is Abraham Quintanilla I, so that is the reason why the surname is needed. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 19:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Chidie345 (talk) 19:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy, greetings. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chidie345

Thank you for creating Micro-Games America Entertainment.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I love redirects. Chidie345 (talk) 04:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bratz: Flaunt Your Fashion, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I understand. But I still want the page to be in the mainspace. Chidie345 (talk) 02:41, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you need to bring the page back cuz I'm right now going to put down more information about the upcoming game. Chidie345 (talk) 16:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bratz Flaunt Your Fashion box cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just convinced the admin to put the page back cuz I'm right now putting more information on the page like I was supposed to. Chidie345 (talk) 16:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just improved my draft so the image doesn't need to be deleted for good. It can stay. Now I have to wait for my page to be accepted for the mainpage. Chidie345 (talk) 19:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bratz: Flaunt Your Fashion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chidie345! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. I just put down the game's info on the page, and like I was told, I added more than one citation. I said what platforms will the game be available on, and what the gameplay is like. I even put down the game's main plot. Chidie345 (talk) 01:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chidie345. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bratz: Flaunt Your Fashion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We do not need links on top of pages when the titel is already clear. If someone searches for the MLP movie from 2016, the would not end up on the page about the 1986 movie, so no "about"-Link is needed there. Gial Ackbar (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That movie came out in 2017, not 2016 Chidie345 (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just for reverting a few of my edits, DO NOT ever contact me. You're banned from my page. Chidie345 (talk) 16:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary caught my attention. Dominican blowout is a redirect to that article so the term should be bold in the body; your edit was helpful. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's the least I can do. Chidie345 (talk) 03:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rock Angelz (soundtrack), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Lane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

whoops Chidie345 (talk) 06:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it Chidie345 (talk) 06:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steven Universe: The Movie (soundtrack), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Ball.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just now fixed it. Chidie345 (talk) 19:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MGA Zapf Creation GmbH logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do delete it. I no longer need it. Chidie345 (talk) 22:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seguin High School (Arlington, Texas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perfect Game.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I fixed it. Chidie345 (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Woodroar (talk) 03:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I would never break the rules, even on FANDOM. Chidie345 (talk) 03:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Killing of Sonya Massey has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. DoctorMatt (talk) 03:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I always use edit summaries. Take a look of my contributions to see proof that I use edit summaries. Chidie345 (talk) 05:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary for a recent edit to Killing of Sonya Massey was "was my edit right or wrong?". This edit summary does not accurately tell other editors what you did. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was obvious of what I mean. I said that because I wasn't sure if my edit was correct or not that it would either be reverted or left alone. Chidie345 (talk) 08:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunset Shimmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know about it. Thanks for reminding me Chidie345 (talk) 22:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I fixed it. Chidie345 (talk) 22:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]