User talk:BoraVoro

Hi BoraVoro! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Kmhkmh (talk) 19:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BoraVoro,

I am writing to request the undeletion of the Wikipedia page titled "Baltic Chemistry Olympiad" which was deleted on [14.12.2023] for the second time. It is not funny that some wiki-enthusiasts decide that BChO is a minor event. You are obviously unaware of the history and traditions of scientific olympiads. Let me explain that there are only four international chemistry olympiads with a significant history: International (since 1968), Mendeleev (since 1992), Ibero-American (since 1996), and Baltic (since 1993). Most importantly, the problems of the Baltic Chemistry Olympiad are in English. Most of them are publicly available, and I am currently working on digitalizing the rest of them. Thus, not only is it a regionally important event, but it is also a significant source of problems for the whole Olympiad community.

I have thoroughly reviewed the deletion policy and believe that the page meets the criteria for inclusion based on the reasons mentioned above. I have also ensured that the content adheres to Wikipedia's standards of verifiability, neutrality, and notability.

I kindly ask for your consideration in reviewing the circumstances of the deletion and considering the new information provided in this request. I am open to feedback and willing to collaborate to address any concerns. For more details, please get in touch with me directly.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards, Olunet (talk) 20:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Andrade Gutierrez

added a link pointing to Congo

Multiply Group PJSC

added a link pointing to Wellness

Nuclebrás Equipamentos Pesados

added a link pointing to Nuclear

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Andrade Gutierrez

added a link pointing to Congo

Multiply Group PJSC

added a link pointing to Wellness

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will take care of it BoraVoro (talk) 08:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BoraVoro. There is no need to sign your edits when adding WikiProject banners to Talk pages, as you did at Talk:Cleo_Joel_Green. While it is appropriate to sign your posts on talk pages, WP:SIGNHERE explicitly says "this does not include adding WikiProject boxes and other such administrative templates." Such banners are commonly edited by many users and are a shared resource, unlike your personal comments, which are attributed to you alone by adding your signature to them. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 10:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice advice, thank you BoraVoro (talk) 08:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BoraVoro,

I noticed that some of the articles you move to main space are returned to main space or recreated there. So, you might try refining your standards of what articles are eligible for draftifications. The most eligible articles are recently created article by new or inexperienced editors and have inadequate sourcing or poorly written content. Of course, a different editor might decided to revert your page move but generally that is done by the content creator. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not draftify an article that has already been moved to Draft space once. An example of this would be Draft:Sky Hawk Times. Rather than moving an article to Draft space a second or third time, either work on improving the article, tag the article indicating any serious problems you see with it or if you believe the article is just unacceptable, pursue one of Wikipedia's deletion processes that is appropriate for the article. But don't draftify it more than once. Always check the page history of an article before deciding what step to pursue next. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz If I find the previous draft was not accepted on AfC, and the new article was reuploaded by the other user (or the same) - what is the best way here? BoraVoro (talk) 07:55, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

regarding this - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessie_Zhao I Afded it, as there are 0 reliable sources. I think I was right when draftified it. BoraVoro (talk) 07:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neue Schenke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neue Schenke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Citadeol (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to GTT Communications has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish I was only able to secure a portion of the information needed, but I found it wasn't adequately paraphrased. This has also raised concerns (deep in my mind) about potential copyright issues. BoraVoro (talk) 14:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Government Boys Higher Secondary School Chakghat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Government Boys Higher Secondary School Chakghat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article and no indication of signifigance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it was not the article of mine. strange that it appeared here. maybe a script assigned it to me, as I edited if shortly after its creation BoraVoro (talk) 13:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on DreamFactory. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. When your speedy deletion nomination is declined, the next step is to discuss it at an appropriate venue, in this case WP:PCM, WP:RM, or WP:RfD. Don't just keep nominating it. – Joe (talk) 12:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not intend to edit war, but sorry for what happened anyway! thanks for notification. BoraVoro (talk) 13:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were requested not to engage in an edit war yet you have done the same with Henry E. (Hank) Scott. Please revert your edit of 9 November 2023. You are being overzealous - not every statement needs a source.ZogNitKeynmol (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

requested by who? are you Henry Scott ? BoraVoro (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just an editor who doesn't like WP:DE ZogNitKeynmol (talk) 01:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heloo Bora. I think you made a mistake. While I appreciate your one year tenure on wikipedia, you are not supposed to delete but rather help improve pages. As far as I can see, you did NOT look into quillbot or insert a tag. Had | made this article in 40 days you would not have been able to move it. Please consider reverting. Comintell (talk) 18:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @BoraVoro I've moved it to mainspace. Again, thank you for pointing out flaws (now fixed)

If you really feel strongly, you may start an AfD at your sole discretion , but please consider contributing to the page. The subjext is notable, supported by independent research, and has sources that meet OGCRIT and SIRS.

Thank you again. Comintell (talk) 19:08, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Century Financial Consultancy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Century Financial Consultancy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—S Marshall T/C 18:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S Marshall by the way, I'm not the author of that page. How did it appear here? :) BoraVoro (talk) 13:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Twinkle thought you were the author, likely because of draftification? I'm sorry for accidentally spamming you about it, in any case.—S Marshall T/C 20:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see:) BoraVoro (talk) 08:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored redirect from Amini (startup) as well Mach61 (talk) 17:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mach61 shouldn't we mark with Promo, etc the page in the case the author was blocked for violating Wikipedia policies? BoraVoro (talk) 09:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A page should only be marked wirh maintenance tags if there are issues with the text itself; tags shouldn't be used to "punish" the author. Mach61 (talk) 12:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My page "Fergus James" has put up for deletion despite meeting the criteria to be accepted as the person is most definitely notable having several songs with over 1,000,000 streams on Spotify. FFelxii (talk) 13:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not object to save it within the discussion. Please feel free to discuss at AfD. BoraVoro (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok i understand but do you have any recommendations that I could add to the page to lower the chance of its deletion? FFelxii (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Try to find the most reliable sources, add them to the page, and mention them in the discussion BoraVoro (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AussieWikiDan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, DarkSide (hacker group), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AussieWikiDan ^(talk) 11:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Can you explain why you have continuously draftified this article even after being advised by Liz in the past not to perform a draftification on an articles that may have already been in draft atleast once? Jamiebuba (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the article was already tagged for UPE, if you didn't feel comfortable with it being in mainspace AFD would have been the next preferable option. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamiebuba I understand your position. You may refer to this essay https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Repeated_draftification, but it is en essay, not a Guideline. BoraVoro (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you carefully read the so called Wikipedia:Repeated draftification which you have referred me to? Do you know that you had moved the article at least 3 times and that taking it to AFD would be a more suitable option that moving it again? In future please refrain from such actions as it is disruptive. Happy Editing Jamiebuba (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you! BoraVoro (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BoraVoro. I am not sure why you moved it back to mainspace before addressing the concerns! Do you think he meets any notability criteria? I am planning to XfD it, so I thought I'd ask you before doing so! If you also feel that he doesn't meet any WP:N criteria, please revert your move. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I agree, moved to draft. Thank you! BoraVoro (talk) 07:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BoraVoro, you added a clarification tag to the lead of Reyna Tropical, and I just wanted to point out that according to MOS:LEADCITE, citations in the lead are not needed if the information appears, and is referenced, in the body. For Reyna Tropical, their musical influences are covered, with quotes and citations, in the 'Musical style and themes' section. Since you didn't include an edit summary, I was wondering if you could tell me what you feel needs to be clarified? GanzKnusper (talk) 16:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree BoraVoro (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BaraVoro, I must admit I'm a little confused at your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connecteam. Can I ask you to elaborate on how you came to the conclusion that the souces met ORGCRIT? Alpha3031 (t • c) 17:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi and sorry for the confusion. I won't tell you more than that I followed the rules and used the arguments raised in the discussion. BoraVoro (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really? That's your full explanation? Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry again for bothering you. I did evaluate the whole context and it was not a snap decision anyway. BoraVoro (talk) 07:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's very good, but I am asking you to explain the grounds for your evaluation, as required. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did answer. BoraVoro (talk) 07:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Connecteam. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! BoraVoro (talk) 13:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BoraVoro as you mentioned the reason for draft move of CAFU, I have removed some promotional content, Please reveiw the draft and please do let me know if i missed anything. Thank you SATavr (talk) 10:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you put a "No reliable source" template in the article, Unitree Robotics. Basing from the WP:RS/P, South China Morning Post, WSJ, Financial Times, and The Guardian are considered reliable sources (WP:GREL).

Putting a "No reliable source" template for the whole article is very misleading, maybe putting a better tag to represent your concerns would be appropriate?

Edit: I already replaced the "no reliable source" tag to an "unreliable sources" tag. Hopefully this will suffice your concern. AsianStuff03 (talk) 03:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage in The Guardian is not reliable and deep, but the others are good. You are right. I searched for Unitree Robotics throughout the articles, but the major coverage is just about "Unitree". Thank you! BoraVoro (talk) 07:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please explain this edit where you tagged the page with {{primary sources}}? A biographical dictionary is certainly not a primary source. Broc (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

agree. I should have placed More citations needed or something like that BoraVoro (talk) 15:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, friend! I am commenting on your discussion page because I came to tell you to reconsider your decision and to investigate the references I provided in Marvín Amparo. I used my valuable time to collaborate on Wikipedia and I want it to be appreciated. http://archive.is/OEFAD this is a reliable newspaper

http://archive.is/2024.07.28-134345/https://www.continenttimes.com/2023/02/marvin-amparo-santana/

https://elnacional.com.do/esquina-joven-celebra-17-anos/ thi is a reliable reference 38.22.17.101 (talk) 15:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marv%C3%ADn_Amparo BoraVoro (talk) 08:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I accepted CAFU at WP:AFC before I noticed it arrived there through WP:DRAFTIFY or I would have objected. The article had 21 references at this time but you inidicated it needed more. I found ample reliable reporting on the company in the version I reviewed and it looks like most of that was in place when you draftified. You also felt it was promotional but I find the language to be reasonably neutral. ~Kvng (talk) 20:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! Glad you reviewed it BoraVoro (talk) 16:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]