User talk:Amshpatten

Sir I could like to know the source of information which is the base of your article about the Pal

dynasty of Pal-lahara

Hello, Amshpatten, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Doug Weller talk 14:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. You are deleting sourced information as well as adding unsourced. Your personal understanding of a subject is not a reason to make such changes. Doug Weller talk 14:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I reverted your edit because I would like to ask if you could include the citation on Ahom script, where it says that it descends directly from Old Mon script, and not from Pyu>Burmese (or Old Mon). I do not have access to the source you are using so I can't look it up myself. In the paper 'The Mon Paradigm and the Origins of the Burma Script' (https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1wn0qs1.10?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents), it is explained in numerous ways how Burmese script must have descended from Pyu and not Old Mon. Looking at the location of the Old Mon kingdom compared to the the Hukawng Valley, where the Ahom people migrated to from China and then to Assam, it seems quite unlikely that their script descends from Old Mon directly. Does your source explain this? Glennznl ([[User talk:Glennzn

Hello Amshpatten, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Gaudi script have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your sources on Odia script are not cited correctly. You can easily cite the correct way by clicking the cite-button while editing, then selecting a template and filling in the form. Could you fix the references on Odia script? Thanks. Glennznl (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Boudh district

added a link pointing to Sambalpuri

Nuapada district

added a link pointing to Sambalpuri

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boudh district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambalpuri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kandhamal district

added a link pointing to Kui language

Koraput district

added a link pointing to Kui language

Nabarangpur district

added a link pointing to Kui language

Rayagada district

added a link pointing to Kui language

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Desia Odia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please expand this draft, and resubmit after expanding.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Desia Odia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Desia Odia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amshpatten! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amshpatten! I want to help you to expand Draft:Desia Odia so we can have it in main space. I am not very familiar with the languages of the area, and there is one thing which I don't quite understand yet fully: according to Glottolog, Kotia and Desia are same, while in Ethnologue, they are listed separately. Are these variants really distinct, or rather kept apart by SIL for socio-cultural reasons? If have followed Glottolog, and added a source that deals with "Kotia Odia". –Austronesier (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Desia is the major regional dialect group of the 4 South-western Odisha districts(Koraput, Malkangiri, Nabarangapur, Rayagada). Its more like a collection of different non-tribal and tribal dialects(tribal-non tribal dialect continuum) of that region, hence the case of different names. Kotia is a tribal language within the Desia grp which is also known as Adivasi Odia, while the non tribal Desia variety is known as Koraputia.-Patten (talk) 05:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. I have now found a similar comment in Glottolog[1]. I will move the page to main space, since I can't see why this shouldn't suffice for a stub. We have many articles about languages for which literally nothing is cited except for Ethnologue and Glottolog, so your page is clearly above the WP:GNG threshold. –Austronesier (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks appreciate it -Patten (talk) 09:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Paralakhemundi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 08:01, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Konark, and several other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 08:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, understood. Patten (talk) 11:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add Indicscript in India related articles as you did at Chhena poda. You have been notified about it before. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know that why did you added Takri to Garhwali page? There is no evidence for the usage of the script for Garhwali Language. Only Pahari languages of Himachal & Jammu & Kashmir, along with Kashtwari from Jammu & Kashmir & Jaunsari & Jaunpuri (at times considered as dialect of Garhwali for which separate wikipedia page exists) from Uttarahand were written using Takri script, that too of a very different variety (here is the proposal of unicode for that variety). Are you a speaker any Pahari language? If yes, the I would like you to contribute to the Swadesh list here. Nik9hil (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Someone had put a Takri image of Garhwali and mentioned it as a historical script. If that is inaccurate, then please remove my edit. Patten (talk) 14:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rangpuri language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assamese script.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Meitei script has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Odia grammar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Zoodino (talk) 15:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rona-Lee Shimon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Navreh has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:49, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Navreh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lunar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs additional sources for verification.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odia grammar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odia grammar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this. Please note that there is a redundant table at Mizoram#Biodiversity. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted -Amshpatten (talk) 07:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Odia language. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please discuss at Odia language talk page whether this should be split from the article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odia grammar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odia grammar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Aka-Jeru language has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello Amshpatten, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Kaundinya I have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(You Asked?) (What I have Done.)} 23:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've noticed you started adding name reading templates to Japanese singers active in the K-pop industry, such as Sakura Miyawaki, Yukika Teramoto, Nako Yabuki, Hitomi Honda, and Juri Takahashi. I have removed Korean readings of their names from the lead of the articles; a Korean pronunciation for native Japanese names are not necessary especially if they are not Korean citizens. Feel free to discuss this on my talk page if they should be included. lullabying (talk) 04:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had added them due to K-pop but I kind of agree with you here that it was somewhat unnecessary. So I guess its fine now since you have taken care of it. Amshpatten (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cambodian people of South Asian descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sujata Koirala (Nepali actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the references pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. nirmal (talk) 07:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Panji. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 19#Panji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In short, the sources are reliable because they were self-published sources created by the person in the biography, which is Benjamin/Bald.

Please refer to my conversation with Nemov for more information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nemov

This topic has already beed resolved, which I mentioned in the reversion notes, so you shouldn't have reverted my edit.

Kind regards, Unofficialwikicorrector (talk) 01:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not involved in the revertion in this case, it seems you tagged the wrong user. Please contact the user who reverted your edits. Amshpatten (talk) 20:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Tosali. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future.— Diannaa (talk) 20:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amshpatten (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Regarding that particular article, I did modify sections from the source before putting it in the main article but I have erred very casually despite being aware of the Wikipedia copyright policy. I have gone through the Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Non-free content as notified to me. As per Wikipedia policy I understand the key policies and issues that governs it.

I understand that Wikipedia content can be copied, modified and redistributed if and only if the copied version is made available on the same terms to others and acknowledgment of the authors of the Wikipedia article used is included. Copied Wikipedia content will therefore remain free under an appropriate license and can continue to be used by anyone subject to certain restrictions, most of which aim to ensure that freedom.

I understand Never to use materials that infringe the copyrights of others as this could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia. If in doubt, write the content yourself, thereby creating a new copyrighted work which can be included in Wikipedia without trouble.- I hereby pledge to always keep this statement in mind henceforth whenever I think to editing here. I will always cite copyrighted works, keeping in mind the issues with copyright.

I love editing articles aided by evidences and proper references and hoped my efforts would contribute to the quality of articles, but it seems I have erred many times with respect to copyright. I hereby apologise for my silly carelessness and pledge to make the effort to always be careful while editing. I don't wish to be blocked as I want to contribute all I can to Wikipedia. I hereby make the commitment never to make the copyright mistake again, providing which I understand I will be blocked again indefintely. Amshpatten (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Copyright is a serious issue and dealing with it sucks up a lot of editor time. Unblocks for CV issues should, in my opinion, only happen when the editor can convincingly demonstrate that they understand why copying copyrighted text is an issue and that it won't be done any more. With no response to Dianaaa's queries below for over two weeks, I'm not convinced. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1. Most of the above unblock request is copied from Wikipedia:Copyrights. I'm not impressed by that.
2. What changed in the 20 minutes between my block and your unblock request? Did you not take our warnings seriously? Why should we now trust you? — Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. I mentioned those specific parts in italics to highlight to issues I am having and to ensure that I have read it thoroughly.
2. I understand I have failed miserably despite being warned about the violations I made. I have been terribly reckless with my editing at times, but I want to assure everyone I consider my blocking to be a very serious matter. As part of my violations, I accept the fact the If I repeat this very mistake next again then it will entirely be my responsibility which I am willing accept. Please kindly consider my case and give me a chance, as I do all of this for the cause of putting accurate information and improve the quality of Wikipedia as I do believe everyone should have access to quality and accurate information. This excessive zeal of accuracy proved to be my folly in the long run, but I have indeed learnt it the hard way. Apologies for all the trouble and I leave this matter to your judgement. Amshpatten (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Amshpatten opened. MER-C 16:29, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]