User talk:Newone

Welcome!

Hello, Newone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Newone 11:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gnetum_gnemon1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:08, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have this image from an other wiki page, Netherlands Gnetum_gnemon2.jpg, but I don't know language there so I cannot understand copyright of this. Any other user should go to check it again for me. Thanks! Newone 07:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gnetum_gnemon_2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 08:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have download from an other wiki page, nederlands so copyright in en.wiki will depend on copyright in http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melindjoe.

Newone 11:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where and how can I have a sample of "Certificate of Quality" of goods which a manufacturer/mill/producer usally use to certify technical specifications of products? Newone 08:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Van_Cao_piano.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vancao.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kieuanh.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Types of Photographic Papers for use in Prosesses 05122006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo PGrand.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo PGrand.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "Stationary Company" from both Office Depot and Staples Inc. Although they may sell paper under their own name, I don't think they can be classified as stationary companies. --GargoyleMT 21:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help me how to unblock to edit enwiki when I received this line:

This account or IP address has been blocked from editing.

You were blocked by Jpgordon for the following reason (see our blocking policy):

open proxy

Your IP address is 203.160.1.42.

Newone 09:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Help me again to unblocked![reply]

Oh, what a pity but I cannot contact this IP's administrator to resolve problem. Please block the IP account, do not block wikipedian while login! Newone 00:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help me to add interwwiki to sizing as follow: fr:Ensimage Newone 03:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry, this link exists in http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schlichte but not in fr! Newone 03:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted uncommented addition of external links to ISO standard sale pages, which were pretty inappropriate, especially on the Whiteness article. Dicklyon 06:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And please use the edit summary box to comment your edits. Dicklyon 06:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Writing paper, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Writing paper is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Writing paper, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Newone. Thanks for taking time to add to these articles. Unfortunately your addition of non-english and commercial links to the articles have been reverted as they fell foul of our external links guidelines. For the most part links should provide additional encyclopedic information about the subject of the article, and non-English language links and links to pages that promote products and services are not appropriate. Thanks. Happy editing! -- SiobhanHansa 12:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is Rhamnoneron balansae? [1] Newone 23:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Types of Photographic Papers for use in Prosesses 05122006.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are invited to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Vietnam, where those of us interested in improving Vietnam-related articles meet to discuss which projects need to be done. Just add your name in the list of Participants, and we'd be glad to have you! Badagnani (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If your ISP has misconfigured its proxy, you can try bypassing it by logging into Wikimedia's secure gateway at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies.

Bắt đầu cấm: 22:19, ngày 28 tháng 7 năm 2007

Kết thúc cấm: vô hạn

Người bị cấm: 203.160.1.32/27

Bạn có thể liên lạc với Jpgordon hoặc một người quản lý khác để thảo luận về việc cấm. Bạn không thể sử dụng tính năng “gửi thư cho người này” trừ khi bạn đã đăng ký một địa chỉ thư điện tử hợp lý trong tùy chọn tài khoản và bạn không bị khóa chức năng đó. Địa chỉ IP hiện tại của bạn là 203.160.1.56, và mã số cấm là #579084.

Please unlock for me? Newone (talk) 05:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please unlock for me:

This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If your ISP has misconfigured its proxy, you can try bypassing it by logging into Wikimedia's secure gateway at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies.

(Multi-RBL lookup • Sandbox test edit)

Bắt đầu cấm: 22:19, ngày 28 tháng 7 năm 2007

Kết thúc cấm: vô hạn

Người bị cấm: 203.160.1.32/27

Newone (talk) 03:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blnguyen had requested me for the service of TinucherianBot to tag articles in the categories in Wikipedia:WikiProject Vietnam/Categories for the WikiProject Vietnam. I request the members to kindly have a look , carefully verify ALL the categories and remove all the possibly wrong categories. Please Dont misunderstand by being cautious here , as we have faced many issues with such huge scale bot tagging earlier. Once I get the final go ahead, I will start the bot with the final list. Thank you for choosing TinucherianBot for the project,. It is a pleasure working for this project...I have also left a note at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Vietnam#Project_talk_page_tagging and request your comments there. You are receiving this message as you are a member of the project. Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 06:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My favour film: Desperado (film). Newone (talk) 14:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo PGrand nho.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to Pattaya. However you marked your recent edit with M which is for really small edits such as corrections to punctuation or capitalisation etc. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed without necessarily opening the page history to find what you did. Please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or even for small but important changes, like changing dates or numbers, or adding images. Thank you. –--Kudpung (talk) 10:44, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't waste people's time by adding {{stub}} to an article such as Greeting card which is clearly not a Stub. There are plenty of other templates to add if you think the article needs improving. PamD (talk) 12:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it can be improved with some types of greeting cards, such as thanh you card, teacher card, new year card... the biggest anf the smallest GC, compare GC in western and estern culture. Newone (talk) 13:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By all means improve it, or ask for it to be improved (eg {{expand}}), but don't label it as a stub ("A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information...", from WP:Stub), when it isn't one. PamD (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Writing paper. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Writing paper. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Newone! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Hà Kiều Anh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the Hanoi article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cha`o anh. Are you aiming to make a serious run to make Hanoi or other Viet articles FA? YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 23:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Newone (talk) 02:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Universe. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 11:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Newone, I see you undid my undo with the edit summary use " " instead of " ". Still baffled about what this possible could mean, I had to load both versions into an external editor and perform a binary compare to be able to find out. Ok, I see what happened now: you replaced occurrences of double spaces with a single space. But, hah... note that browsers always reduce multiple spaces to single spaces, so it is impossible to notice any difference in the text, in the compare window, and in the edit summary. So, perhaps next time, could please write something like cleaned out sme double spaces? That would be helpful. Thanks and cheers. - DVdm (talk) 12:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've answered your question on Talk: Earth's orbit. Duoduoduo (talk) 19:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Umm..then create a disambiguation page? That's all I can suggest. Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 13:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are your two recent additions historically significant? -- please indicate in the "Notes" column. -- Elphion (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Van Cao piano.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Sven Manguard Wha? 07:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re edits such as this and this, also others - these hatnotes are inappropriate because the title is not ambiguous, see WP:NAMB. Further, per WP:HNP, hatnotes should be first of all - before any cleanup templates or infoboxes. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rhacophorus vampyrus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the tadpole of the Vampire flying frog Rhacophorus vampyrus has two fang-like hooks in its mouth? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

You can view the full list of stub types at WP:STUBS

Hello Newone,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}} template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks!

Baseball Watcher 20:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure that your edit summaries accurately reflect the contents of your edit. This edit was labelled as "Undid revision 455011051 by Stemonitis (talk)", which is not entirely true. You did (inappropriately) undo some of the things I had fixed, but not all, and you also introduced new material. Please also note that there is no point in linking to the Wikimedia Commons if the only media there are already presented in the article. --Stemonitis (talk) 06:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trang này có đã được lưu bởi người khác sau khi bạn bắt đầu sửa. Phía trên là bản hiện tại. Phía dưới là sửa đổi của bạn. Bạn sẽ phải trộn thay đổi của bạn với bản hiện tại. Chỉ có phần văn bản ở phía trên là sẽ được lưu khi bạn nhất nút “Lưu trang”. Newone (talk) 08:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In England, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages South west and North west (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Shoplet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Printer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited PRIMEHPC FX10, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rack and GB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you removed a bunch of formatting spaces from the Mars article, so I just wanted to mention that doing so saves no space whatsoever. The rendered page will be exactly the same, while the old database formatting will stay in disk storage for the lifetime of the article. The only thing you accomplished is to make it a little bit more difficult for editors to check the table formatting and perform edits. Regards, RJH (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Three-dimensional space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Matthews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Huawei Ascend Mate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good eye! Many such homonyms seem to exist between plants and animals. I changed [[Paragramma]] to [[Paragramma (plant)|Paragramma]] per Tropicos. I don't have time to do the massive reffing the page needs, but that should do it for now. Thanks, Hamamelis (talk) 06:33, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also List of fern families: Subfamily Microsoroideae and Microsoroideae#Genera? Newone (talk) 03:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Codex Leicester, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aristolochia quangbinhensis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cm, Petiole and Peduncle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asia Pacific Gateway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Titanic (1997 film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 15:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boycott Chinese products, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leica Camera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shutterbug. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gateway Tracing Paper Info.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, my web site has been changed but still find it here: https://web.archive.org/web/20071010054047/http://tmg.com.vn/Editor/assets/gateway%20tracing%20paper%20info%20nho.jpg Newone (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi—thanks for your work on en.WP. Just a reminder that we don't normally link dates. Tony (talk) 11:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard I of England may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/GuillaumeTyr4.asp Medieval Sourcebook: Guillame de Tyr (
• of Tyre): Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum [History of Deeds Done Beyond the Sea]).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just use it as appearence in original page. Newone (talk) 09:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of species described in 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leptochilus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Icelandic Phallological Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seals. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article American Insurance Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG. References are mostly self-published or directory entries. Subject did bring a suit against the state of California that was eventually decided by SCOTUS, but the fact that it was a notable case does not automatically make the participants notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tsukiyamaia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kachin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bản mẫu:Traffic law. Since you had some involvement with the Bản mẫu:Traffic law redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Category:American films from film articles. As noted at the article for the category, all American films should include this category regardless of any subcats they may also be members of. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Elliot321. Newone, thanks for creating Macrosolen!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please make sure to add some references to the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Elliot321 (talk) 13:16, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm looking for sources now. Newone (talk) 13:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Library, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keeper of the Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was this an upload of yours on another Wikipedia, that got uploaded here by a third party? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In any event it would be much appreciate if you could review ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I uploaded it in viwiki as vi:Tập tin:DSC01374.jpg. Newone (talk) 08:41, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now it is already in commons. Newone (talk) 08:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VinFast, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages VIR and Klara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Vietnam Information Security Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SITH (talk) 14:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You're invited to an RfC on the question of, "Within the section on the Iran-Contra affair, should we include the aspect of drug trafficking on the part of some Nicaraguan Contras?"

Talk:Ronald_Reagan#rfc_85A761C

Thanks,

FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VinFast LUX SA2.0, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, VinSmart, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 08:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I will write now. Newone (talk) 08:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VinSmart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commercial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, VinFast Fadil, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The {{Other uses}} template is designed to be used on the primary topic of a title that would otherwise be ambiguous. There is no reason to include it on a page like Vantablack (EP) because it already has an ambiguator. There is already a template in use at Vantablack, and it's good enough. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

However, I will point out that the {{Other uses of}} template exists for this purpose. I would be unopposed to the usage of this in the EP article. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to VinFast President. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, VinFuture Prize, is not suitable as written to remain published. It will not be notable until they actually begin awarding prizes. If they do in the next six months, add a list of them, with appropriate third party references to the awards--not justf rom your site. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: As I know, the first award season will be at 2022 January, so the date 6 months is too short. Newone (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Newone, I have moved it your user space as User:Newone/Vinfuture Prize. You can move it back to Draft when ready. Please remember that 1/ you will need to declare any WP:Conflict of Interest, and 2/ You absolutely need references from Third Party Independent reliable sources, that are not press releases or mere announcements. DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about Critics' Choice Super Awards? Newone (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little skeptical about that one too, for its too new to be notable but at least it's specialized and has a particular reason for existence rather than one more general prize, and it doesn't have see also to major awards way beyond its importance. ``.

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Nobel Prize and Fields Medal. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thanked you for the edit you made to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thaddeus_Stevens, because it was to an edit that I'd made. I've added footnotes to other Wikipedia entries that show a URL, because I don't know how to do it the way you fixed Thaddeus Stevens. For example, I added the two footnotes at the bottom of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pietro_Aretino. Would you fix them as well, or tell me how to do so? Thanks.Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VinFast Fadil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CUV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Michael Lohscheller, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 08:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: I had filled some sources. Can you have a look at this again? Newone (talk) 05:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's going to need a little rewriting for style. I can do it easierthan I can tell you how to do it. It will take me a few days or a week.to get to it. I'm cirious tho: He was ceo of a large company, an his subseqent positions have been with branches of companies of a brand manager for a smaller company. DGG ( talk ) 06:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Automotive industry in Vietnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electric scooter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JaGa: Done, tks. Newone (talk) 06:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Antarctica for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VinFast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tempest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Newone. I'm sorry to come with a negative message, especially since as far as I can recall this is our first interaction. But please stop what you're doing -- which I think(?) is finding navboxes and inserting them into articles you think they should be linked in? Instead, you're finding errors in navboxes and making bizarre edits based on them.

The most obvious example is this where you added {{Cuban musical forms}} to Dengue fever, an article about a mosquito-transmitted disease. I guess it was because that navbox had a link to "dengue" and you assumed it was referring to the same thing? It isn't. And while I know nothing about Cuban music, Googling "dengue music" brings up no genres (though one band called Dengue Fever!). A second example is {{Drugs for functional gastrointestinal disorders}} which you added to Silicone because the navbox had an entry "silicones". I searched Google and Pubmed for any indication of why "Silicones" was in that navbox and I can't figure it out. Maybe it's an error? Either way, the article "Silicone" is about silicone broadly. Having a navbox to point readers to drugs for digestive diseases doesn't make much sense, and surely falls afoul of the guidance at WP:NAVBOX for what constitutes a "good" navbox use. I haven't looked into your other edits, but since those are both recent, I'd encourage you to please stop doing this.

I've reverted the edits above. If you think I've acted in error, you're more than welcome to start discussions at the affected pages and we can hear from others. Thanks and I hope all is well. Ajpolino (talk) 22:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ItsCheck. An edit that you recently made to List of most-viewed YouTube videos seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The articles have specified that all view counts should be edited simultaneously, not individually. ItsCheck (talk) 02:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsCheck: I had already checked data in YouTube's clip. Newone (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Newone

I am aware that you have, it's just that the page you edited must have all view counts edited together. That's just the page's guidelines and I'm not a fan of them either but it is what it is. ItsCheck (talk) 20:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited List of electric truck makers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CES.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]