User talk:Mikaey/Archives/2009/April

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mikaey. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 April 7#Rage quit → Multiplayer video game. Uncle G (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

When will this test be over? Is it safe to NOINDEX it? --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, as soon as I can figure out whether or not my code is working. Hopefully in the next few minutes. You can NOINDEX it, that's fine. Matt (talk) 22:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, okay. What was the test page for anyways? --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Aha! I should've checked your user page. Then I would've discovered that you run the ListasBot. Well good job on fixing your code. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

A link to LisgasBot would have been helpful on the test page. :p No worries though. Everything worked out fine. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I just wanted to inform you that I mentioned your bot at WT:Categorization of people#Periods/full stops in sort keys. I believe that the bot is incorrectly removing/omitting periods/full stops, but we'll see what others have to say.... MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 01:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for making the change. I certainly never intended for you to shut down those capabilities of the bot while this was being decided. The fact that you did shows that you are a very conscientious botmaster. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 22:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mikaey I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ListasBot 2 has been approved. Please visit the above link for more information. Thanks! BAGBot (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

		The Wikipedia Bot Builder Award
		For cleaning up countless bio templates, and being responsive to suggestions for improvement, here's a virtual token of appreciation. – Quadell (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you! Matt (talk) 20:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

As follow-up, the archiving at Dae Mo Nim was done just right. Well done. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I think you could get away without one, but "I didn't think I needed one" tends to sound a bit lame six months down the road. Thus I would urge you to file a BRFA for it - Quadell's particularly active at the minute and would no have it seen to in a prompt manner (apologies, my editing's a bit too sparse to see much through from beginning to end at the moment). I don't think it would have any problem passing, so if you can hold yourself back for the week that would take, I would. Oh, and it sounds like a good solid idea (which makes me wonder why no-one's thought of it before), so good luck with that. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 16:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)