User talk:Mark612

Hello, Mark612, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 21:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ibadibam. Your recent edit to the page Bucatini appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ibadibam (talk) 19:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that the edits you made to Swensons were not with the intention of improving encyclopedic coverage of the topic. I have removed the sentence and accompanying link that is apparently a picture of you, your friend, or someone you're trying to embarrass. Everything else I have tagged for further scrutiny. Please share your rationale for these edits at Talk:Swensons#BBYO. Ibadibam (talk) 19:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Swensons, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Ibadibam (talk) 01:07, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Swensons, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Ibadibam (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark612. You have new messages at Ibadibam's talk page.
Message added 04:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ibadibam (talk) 04:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit-warring over the article. Start a discussion on the article's talk page instead, and build consensus for the inclusion of the material you wish to add.

You might want to read WP:Verifiability and WP:Identifying reliable sources. If, after reading them, you still believe the section of puffery you're fighting to add to the article is adequately sourced, please start a discussion at WP:RS/N and see what the editors there think. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop and use the article's talk page to discuss your proposed changes. Otherwise, I will report you for edit-warring and you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark612. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Ohio Northern Region BBYO

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mark. I've blocked you temporarily as you don't seem to understand we an an encyclopedia and not an alternative marketing channel for the Solon Commerce Committee. If you're going to edit here, you need to put Wikipedia first, along with its policies and guidelines, not Solon. If you can't do that, then please confine yourself to using article talk pages, as suggested by our conflict of interest guideline. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I understand what it is you want to say and are trying to add, but encyclopedic articles don't include speculative research about a neighborhood and why it is the way it is today. Sufficeth to say, Beachwood grew as Jews from the older neighborhoods in the city (e.g. around South Taylor, Shaker, South Euclid, and Glenville) moved up the economic ladder and bought bigger houses in a greener part of Greater Cleveland. But I can't make a case for that because first off, the study I can cite doesn't exist; it's not as though there's a massive case study done on Cleveland's Jewish community. Now, I know why Beachwood is teh way it is from having grown up around there. But regardless of who writes it, it doesn't belong in the article. Forgetting for a second that the article is about Beachwood and sticking to the basic facts (as encyclopedias are supposed to do), and even if its economic micro-demographic and the subsequent migrating eastward, could be substantiated, it still wouldn't belong in the article. This isn't an economics based article. Even bigger cities have more detailed sub-articles detailing subsections on separate pages. And what's more, while Beachwood is a substantial Jewish community in the Cleveland area, it's still relativley small compared to Jewish communities in NYC, LA or even Chicago (where it's more concentrated in the northern suburbs). Case in point: There are more Jews in Borough Park, Brooklyn than there are people living in CH, Beachwood, South Euclid, University Heights and Shaker Heights combined... and Borough Park is half the size of Beachwood in area. And that's one neighborhood in one borough of NYC. Furthermore, while the religion and culture are important, they are mentioned already in brief. Meanwhile, the majority of what makes Beachwood attractive to anyone not buying a house there is the mall, La Place and Legacy Village and the hotels adjacent 271... and you'll notice that's not even mentioned in the article. What I'm saying is, I get ya, but please bear in mind that this isn't a research paper on Beachwood and Original Research is a no-no on Wikipedia. Cheers. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 05:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Ohio Northern Region BBYO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern Ohio. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Ohio Northern Region BBYO requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — IVORK _Discuss 11:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slavuta, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shops, Field and Traders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the Ohio Northern Region BBYO Regional Boards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the Ohio Northern Region BBYO Regional Boards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pontificalibus (talk) 07:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on David Berger AZA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 02:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on David Berger AZA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7 - re-adding after being rm by author

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 03:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 03:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with David Berger AZA. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 03:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Beachwood, Ohio shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to change the name of the David Berger AZA page to David Berger AZA #1823. As you probably know, there is another chapter called David Berger AZA in Dallas. Please add a better citation to the part where it says Berger has over 90 members because the link does not mention that. Also, maybe the page should be merged with Ohio Northern Region page with maybe a paragraph about each of ONR's chapters

The article David Berger AZA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable local chapter of an organization. No references prove notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 01:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Beachwood, Ohio. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to add a personal note here in addition to the templated message above. If any of your edits are reverted it is essential that you do not edit war back. If it is important to you, then start a discussion and get a consensus for the change. If you persist in this kind of editing when your block expires, you will probably be getting a much longer block next time. I hope you can bring your editing in line with our expectations. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Berger AZA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Berger AZA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:38, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ohio Northern Region BBYO has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nn per WP:BRANCH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 22:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide even one policy based reason for your removal of the above? Have you ever read the notability guidelines for organizations? Looking at your talk page, it certainly appears you are here for reasons other than to improve the encyclopedia. Your edit summary left when you removed the PROD indicates clearly that you think the things you contribute here remain under your control. They don't. See OWN. It's not a far fetched prediction that your editing privileges may be revoked for continuing on the path you are on. Please take some time to learn what Wikipedia is (and isn't). To that end, I'll leave you some info at the bottom of this page. John from Idegon (talk) 11:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ohio Northern Region BBYO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ohio Northern Region BBYO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

elcome to Wikipedia Mark612, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance		Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.		Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.		How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.		Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.		Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance		Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.		Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by pressing or in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 11:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC) John from Idegon (talk) 11:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mark612, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 11:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ohio Northern Region BBYO. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 22:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Ohio Northern Region BBYO, you may be blocked from editing. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 03:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 02:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark612. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark612. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Solon High School has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster (Chat) 12:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. In particular, see WP:BLPCRIME. Larry Hockett (Talk) 21:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 00:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Josh Mandel for disruptive editing, specifically the unexplained removal of well referenced content. You are free to try to gain consensus for your proposed changes at Talk: Josh Mandel. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 03:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Beachwood, Ohio, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 03:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also,

500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.

The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.

3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Your last few edits were reverted, not by me, and you should not have made them. Doug Weller talk 08:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is still true, and you still may not edit material related to the Arab-Israeli conflict topic. nableezy - 22:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to edit these topics I will be asking the restriction be enforced with a block. nableezy - 22:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 08:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AE#Mark612. nableezy - 23:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s interesting how when anti Israel activists decide to add irrelevant information for sake of trying to instill their pro-Palestine opinions on any page related to Israel, admins seem to not have a problem with it until someone corrects the issue. Virtual jihad if you will. Mark612 (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Youre free to make that argument at WP:AE#Mark612. nableezy - 23:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 10:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]