User talk:Mardecayrigboi12436

Hello, I'm Perfect4th. I noticed that you recently removed content from Man of Action Entertainment without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Perfect4th (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

but sorry, all of this is 100% false information and Wikipedia does not allow that. so put your shitty fanfic content to fandom or some crap. Mardecayrigboi12436 (talk) 14:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does hope to provide accurate information. However, the policy stating what should and should not be included (Verifiability) actually doesn't technically say anything about truth; we want content to be verifiable and cited with reliable sources first and foremost. You may be right in this case – I don't have expertise on this subject. I cannot tell what does and does not belong on the page without something else to check to make sure that it belongs there (thus the importance of sources). If you have a source stating which of those included in the article should be there, feel free to add it! It's the best way to make sure people know that what's in the article belongs in the article. Perfect4th (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Go away. BrickMaster02 (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i will not vandalize i swear. Mardecayrigboi12436 (talk) 22:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bsoyka was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Regular Show (2022 series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Regular Show (2022 series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bsoyka (talk) 16:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mardecayrigboi12436! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bsoyka (talk) 16:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Regular Show (2022 series). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it was an unannounced Paramount+ project Mardecayrigboi12436 (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it’s unannounced, it doesn’t exist CreecregofLife (talk) 01:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mardecayrigboi12436. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ARoseWolf 19:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Regular Show (2022 series), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CreecregofLife (talk) 02:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

but at least give me the source for the page that you deleted so that i can put it in my sandbox. Mardecayrigboi12436 (talk) 08:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mardecayrigboi12436 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am doing this for fun and i'm just practicing my Wikipedia skills Mardecayrigboi12436 (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you think that this is a legitimate skill to practice, there are no grounds to remove the block. When you are done having fun and wish to participate in this project to write an encyclopedia of human knowledge, please tell what contributions you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 13:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i want to find lost information on Wikipedia and import them there Mardecayrigboi12436 (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]