User talk:47.32.20.133

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (47.32.20.133) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Nardog (talk) 20:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! Ho visto che hai fatto diverse modifiche migliorative sulle pagine riguardanti la lingua e la fonologia italiane ed hai anche partecipato a diverse discussioni. Vorrei chiedere la tua opinione, ed eventualmente il tuo aiuto, riguardo ad una certa questione ortografica e fonetica, nulla di complicato. Se fossi interessato, come spero, rispondimi sulla mia pagina di discussione. Grazie!

Con piacere. Non mi hai lasciato nessun recapito, ma possiamo parlarne qui.--47.32.20.133 (talk) 22:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andava bene sulla mia pagina di discussione, ma forse è meglio se scriviamo entrambi in un'unica pagina. Allora, potresti dirmi che cosa pensi nello scenario che vado a presentarti? Riguarda il titolo da dare ad una voce. Il nome è quello di un Italiano, ma potrebbe essere una parola italiana, ed è accentato sulla E. Su un dizionario italiano (per esempio il Dizionario d'ortografia e pronunzia) viene riportato con l'accento acuto, indicando a fianco la relativa pronuncia semichiusa. Su Internet si trovano altri risultati con questa grafia, ma molti altri con l'accento grave, certamente meno rilevanti di un dizionario. Ciò è dovuto sia alla pronuncia locale del nome, con accento diverso dallo standard fiorentino, sia al fatto che visse nell'800 e di solito allora tutti gli accenti finali erano scritti gravi, sia al fatto che sulla nostra tastiera dobbiamo premere "maiuscolo+è" per ottenere "é" e spesso chi digita neanche sa la differenza fra l'uno e l'altro. A tuo parere quale sarebbe il titolo giusto da dare alla voce? Quello con l'accento acuto, riportato dal dizionario ma meno diffuso in rete, o quello con l'accento grave, non corrispondente alla pronuncia toscana ma apparentemente più diffuso? Per favore, fammi sapere la tua opinione. Grazie!

Mi dispiace, ma devo confessare che senza avere le informazioni basilari sul tizio, non so rispondere. 47.32.20.133 (talk) 19:51, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Il tizio è Giuseppe Pitré ([1]): è siciliano e nel dialetto locale viene pronunciato "Giuseppi Pitrè"; molti risultati su Internet lo danno come "Pitrè" ma ce ne sono tanti altri che invece lo riportano in italiano standard come "Pitré". Ora che sono stato più preciso riesci a dirmi qual è la tua opinione al riguardo?

Ora sì. Ovviamente il fiorentino non c'entra -- e il DOP fiorentineggiante può essere sospetto per la pronuncia di un cognome siciliano. Non capisco i motivi per cui Pitré sarebbe italiano standard. Comunque, il cognome va scritto come lo scriveva lui, ed è quasi sicuro che la forma fosse Pitrè. I suoi libri pubblicati durante la sua vita portano il cognome Pitrè ([2]} ([3]), sua figlia sembra adoperare è ([4]), e pare che Pitrè sia molto più comune di Pitré fra gli studiosi. In assenza di indicazioni contrarie, si suppone che la vocale finale sia [ɛ]. 47.32.20.133 (talk) 16:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, it turns out that even the guy who started all the trouble -- and consequently wasted a lot of his and others' time -- re è or é knows that the genuine form is Pitrè: "in Sicily (where Pitré lived) the local pronunciation has only open vowels (/ɛ/ and /ɔ/), so probably Pitré used to pronounce his name /pi'trɛ/ and to sign as "Pitrè". Unfortunately, he also got it into his head that DOP is a sort of phonological bible for all of Italy, as though no other source, not even the trail left by Pitrè himself, could trump their exuberant Florentinizing. Why, I don't know; severe overdose of prescriptivism, perhaps, and/or yearning for an authority to tell him what to do (and in doing it, denigrate both Pitrè and his Palermitano). The issue seems to be settled now. I hope the poor guy learned something from the experience. 47.32.20.133 (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Castel Gandolfo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 20:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Città di Castello shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 20:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thanks, I suppose. You don't say which edits of mine you're referring to, so it's not easy to address the problem. A few weeks ago there was a disruptor called Mosidan (for the nonce; he adopts several names) chasing me around reverting my good-faith legitimate IPA renditions of Italian toponyms, even removing references, and claiming that his versions were consensus when they were not. An editor by the handle of Scrapiron seems to have decided to accept the incorrect versions, so I gave up on trying to help to assure accuracy for Wikipedia in that regard.47.32.20.133 (talk) 14:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]