User talk:160.72.80.178

Hello, I'm My Pants Metal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dave Gettleman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. My Pants Metal (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dave Gettleman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jason Garrett, you may be blocked from editing. ChromiumOverload (Talk 📨) 20:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Serry Sr.—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Materialscientist -- Just a quick note to thank you for your assistance--With your permission I have restored the edits to the article since the Wikipedia Project Classical Music has posted a specific prohibition against using an info box for this article ("!-- Please do not insert info box as per guidelines for Wikipedia Classical Music Project-->") which is only visible at the top of the article only when one attempts to edit the article. The remaining edits also serve to reduce unnecessary crowding of text in the article to improve the readability and are essentially cosmetic in nature (i.e. no substantial changes to content were made). I've posted more details on your talk page. I hope this is OK. Thanks again for all your help and best wished for your future editorial endeavors.160.72.80.178 (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC)NHPL[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Leonidlednev. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Guy Lombardo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 21:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Yehudi Menuhin and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Gor1995 𝄞 22:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I'll be more cautious in the future. Ciao! 160.72.80.178 (talk) 22:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Guy Lombardo you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Guy Lombardo for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 03:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Averageuntitleduser ---Many thanks for the exhaustive analysis of the nomination of Guy Lombardo to Good Article status. It would appear that considerable work remains to be done. Your expert insights are greatly appreciated. When I have time in the future, I shall make an attempt to incorporate them wherever possible into the content. In the meantime-- thanks again and best wishes for your future editing endeavors! Ciao. 160.72.80.178 (talk) 22:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)NHPL[reply]