Talk:Secondary growth

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (September 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

There seem to be a few inconsistencies in the introductory definition. I'll try to edit out some superfluous info from that section as well Zujua (talk) 04:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, primary growth redirects to this article, but (apart from a few words in the lead) isn't discussed; the redirect boldly says that primary makes no sense except wrt secondary - let's just beg to differ. The two solutions that spring to mind are a) to have a new article on primary growth, all apical meristems etc; or b) to rename this article and edit it to cover both (sounds daft but it needed saying). I suggest we do (a), reclaiming the redirect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chiswick Chap. I just created the article on primary growth. At the present time, it is stub-like. I am a gardener who is interested in botany, but the article would benefit from more expert inputs. If you are still on WP (after almost 9 years!), could you take a look at it and improve it? Contributions welcome! Dr Dobeaucoup (talk) 15:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help me get the answers 41.81.3.53 (talk) 05:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]