Talk:R v Burgess

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments before I go to sleep:

• Case needs some exposition as to why it is an important decision
• Appeal section needs to refer to comments on previous CA/HL decisions and explain why they were applied/not applied/distinguished.
• Case needs Bailii reference if available
• Otherwise, commentary from legal textbooks would be helpful.
• See R v Collins for the bare minimum for appeal cases. Rodhullandemu 02:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]