Talk:Princeton Rugby

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rugby union Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I added a lot of third party sources. Wharsh88 (talk) 18:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None of them cover the Club in significant coverage to meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG. Codf1977 (talk) 18:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-tagged for Notability as I can find nothing in the sources or in any search that indicates why Princeton Rugby is any more notable than the other uni rugby clubs in Ireland, Britain, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand or France. Please before anyone removes the tag can they past here the details of the significant coverage of the club as mentioned in WP:CLUB and/or WP:ORG. Codf1977 (talk) 06:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Princeton was an early and important actor in various codes of football. Most of the schools rugby clubs in the countries mentioned above have their own wiki entry. Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Sydney University, etc. Why would those deserve an entry but not Princeton? All are early and important rugby clubs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.165.36 (talk) 19:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFF is no reason to have an article, what needs to exist is the significant coverage of the club as mentioned in WP:CLUB and/or WP:ORG can you please post links to them. Codf1977 (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]