Talk:Medical education

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Education High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

According to Walter Bradford Cannon in his biography The Way of the Investigator, p. 85, he initiated "Case study" methods in medical education. He says that he wrote an article "The Case System of Teaching Systemic Medicine" for the Boston Medical and Sugical Journal. (no date given) He says he was prompted by observing his roomate Harry A. Bigelow prepare for his law courses with the Casebook method. In WP Case study is devoted to sociology with no mention of medicine. Cannon's statement follows:

The idea of using printed clinical records, that I suggested as basis for discussing diagonosis and proper treatment, was at once favorably received and put into use. Case books on disease of the nervous system, on general medicine, and on diseases of children soon appeared.... That reform started about 1900.

Can anyone confirm Cannon's story. What about today's educational paradigm ? Rgdboer (talk) 00:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Cannon's story is easily disproved. A little reading in the history of medicine quickly demonstrates that the case study was a -- if not the -- principal method of instruction in so-called Western medicine, as far back as Classical Greece and Rome. --Una Smith (talk) 04:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing, a case study in sociology is equivalent to a "clinical review" in medicine. The "case study" referred to here concerns the use of a medical case report (often a mock report) as a teaching tool. ---Una Smith (talk) 05:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Following the suggestion to do reading in the history of medicine, I took up Making Medicine Scientific (2002) by Terrie M. Romano. The subtitle is John Burdon Sanderson and the Culture of Victorian Science; chapter one, "Choosing Medicine" has a section "Time in Paris" describing Sanderson's further medical education in 1851. On page 26 we find:

He joined the English Medical Society and was for a time its president. The society held weekly meetings at which students read papers on medical subjects or communicated the history of cases, followed by general discussion.

So I will agree with Una Smith that Cannon did not initiate the use of case reports in med ed.Rgdboer (talk) 22:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Canada, medicine is not technically a graduate entry degree. I think "second entry degree" would be more accurate, as many medical schools (for example the University of British Columbia) allow admission after 3 years of undergraduate study. 96.48.145.148 (talk) 04:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good article, but the "Online Learning" section shamelessly promotes Virtual Dental Patients and BioDigital Human. Such advertising doesn't belong in the article--nor would criticism, for that matter. Wikipedia should be "just the fact, ma'am" (and the uncontroversial facts at that) and avoid saying that X provides "valuable information," "represents a paradigm shift in clinical measurement for dentistry," "demystifyi[es] what goes on below the skin through friendly visuals," or "addresses this problem." Thank you. 2Plus2Is4 (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent spam undone. LeadSongDog come howl! 03:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medical education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324152337/http://www.license.umn.edu/Products/Minnesota-Virtual-Clinic-Medical-Education-Software__Z05174.aspx to http://www.license.umn.edu/Products/Minnesota-Virtual-Clinic-Medical-Education-Software__Z05174.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am a medical student working on a project for a course. I will be editing the article entitled "Medical Education" because it is a topic that interests me. The outline for my plan can be found below:

Introduction : This section is generally well organized. I will review the available references an add to them if needed. I may further summarize the subheadings in one or two sentences.

Entry-Level Education/Postgraduate education: I will not add much to this section, but review it and edit according to the wikipedia manual of style (MoS).

Continuing Medical Education: In this section I will include several examples of continuing medical education required to maintain medical licencing. I will include references and links to wikipedia articles on those specific subjects.

Online medical education: The field of telemedicine is exploding right now and becoming an increasingly important topic in medical education. Teleconferences are utilized frequently in medical education and tele-clinical encounters are starting to be integrated into the medical curriculum. I will expand upon this section briefly and add references.

Example of medical education systems: I will review this section using the manual of style guidelines, but I will not edit this section substantially.

Integration with Health Policy: I will review this section using the manual of style guidelines, but I will not edit this section substantially.

Medical education as a subject-didactic field: The majority of my edits will be in this area. I will delineate various styles of teaching used in medical schools, including Lecture based learning, Problem Based Learning (PBL), Team Based Learning (TBL), and simulation education etc. This may require me to make new pages for each type of learning or simply make new subheadings for each.

In addition to the above edits, I would like to help translate this article into Spanish, as there is no Spanish version of this article.

I look forward to working with you on this project! Please offer your comments and critique as necessary.

Thank you --Hartmanethan (talk) 17:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]