Talk:MS Amera

Split

This article should be split one for each ship. Hue White (talk) 20:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a single ship that has had multiple names over its career. Standard practice is to name the article after the most recent or last name the ship was known under, with redirects from the other names. Any discussions on changing this practice should be directed to WT:SHIPS, as a change in how these situations are handled would directly impact a large number of articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh - wait - maybe I misunderstood. I thought you were wanting to split out each name the current Prinsendam has been known under into its own article - that would go against past practice. But were you actually talking about splitting out the "Past Prinsendam" into its own? In that case, I agree - as that was a different ship. --- Barekкороче кака

] • contribs) - 20:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MS Prinsendam (1988). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080522105141/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCP/is_2_23/ai_78256205 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCP/is_2_23/ai_78256205

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MS Prinsendam (1988). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]