Talk:Lionhearted

	Lionhearted has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	Lionhearted is part of the Worlds series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 21, 2024 Good article nominee Listed July 8, 2024 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lionhearted/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 21:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 06:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

We are reunited once again for this review! --K. Peake 06:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The infobox recording date of 2014 is not sourced in the body anywhere
  • Removed
• WP:OVERLINK of Porter Robinson under songwriters
  • Fixed
• Replace hlist with bullet points per Template:Infobox song
  • Fixed
• The first sentence should mention it being from his debut studio album, Worlds (2014)
  • Added
• Move the release sentence to the fourth of the paragraph instead and change to the album rather than its title
  • Did something similar to "Sad Machine". Skyshiftertalk 21:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "The track was one of" → "It was one of"
  • Done
• I would suggest starting a new para at the Passion Pit and re-word it to something like "The song was noted for the influence from Passion Pit."
  • Did something similar to "Sad Machine". Skyshiftertalk 21:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Add after the above sentence one about the song's critical reviews
  • As with "Sad Machine" I prefer adding sentences regarding reviews only when sources explicitly comment on it. In the case of "Sad Machine", critics generally agreed on its atmospheric feeling, but here I don't think there's an easy way to summarize the reviews, otherwise it would get too extensive. However I added another sentence saying that critics noted that "it was the first on Worlds with a faster tempo". Skyshiftertalk 21:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "a music video was" → "an accompanying music video was" with the wikilink, add info about the synopsis too
  • Done
• Mention which charts it entered
  • I think that's too much info considering the length of the article; it would be almost the same as the last paragraph of "Release and reception".

• Add info about the synths to the audio sample too
  • I don't see that info in the article, but I added that "Multiple critics found it influenced by Passion Pit".
• Add the release year of Space Invaders in brackets
  • Done
• Pipe electro-house to Electro house
  • Done
• Pipe Consequence of Sound to Consequence (publication)
  • Done
• "found it inspired by Passion Pit" → "found it inspired by the band" to avoid using their name so much
  • Done
• Merge the Las Vegas Weekly and Spin sentences by using a comma with "while"
  • I don't think these sentences are related enough, unlike the previous one about Passion Pit.

• "On June 3, "Lionhearted" was" → "On June 3, 2014, "Lionhearted" was" and move [6] to being solely at the end of the sentence
  • Done
• "on the 17th, accompanied by a music video" → "on June 17, accompanied by a music video" with the wikilink
  • Done
• Put parts of the longer reviews quoted into your own words per MOS:OVERQUOTE
  • Done
• 'St Elmo's Fire' should be surrounded by single speech marks and piped to St Elmo's fire
  • Done
• Pipe Variance to Variance (magazine)
  • Done
• Pipe Beat to Beat (magazine)
  • That's a red link, and it's currently linked to Beat Magazine.
• "described it as" → "described the song as"
  • Done
• Mention what the positions the song charted at were, although I do not see the Ultratop Dance one sourced
  • Done

• Good

• Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
  • Done

• I can not see the Dance position in the source

• Good

• Worldwide → Various
  • Done
• You need to add sources for these releases
  • Done

• Copyvio score checks out since nothing shows up and there is not violations of quotes I see myself anyway!!
• What is DJ Times and why is it reliable on ref 2?
  • WP:ABOUTSELF should apply as I'm just using Robinson's words here. Skyshiftertalk 21:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Pipe AXS to AXS (company) on ref 5
  • Done
• Pipe Consequence of Sound to Consequence (publication) on ref 7
  • Done
• Rather than being in the title, cite Apple Music as publisher with the wikilink on ref 13
  • Done
• Pipe Variance to Variance (magazine) on ref 16
  • Done
• Pipe Beat to Beat (magazine) on ref 17
  • That's a red link, and it's currently linked to Beat Magazine.

• Link to music video in the infobox instead of here
  • Keeping both Skyshiftertalk 21:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this went by very quickly! --K. Peake 20:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Kyle Peake: all responded! Skyshiftertalk 21:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Skyshifter I have done some copy editing for you now, although you still need to add various sources to back up the Apple Music releases being in various locations; try about three or four regions please. --K. Peake 09:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Kyle Peake: I'm having trouble with that (i.e. I can't find the Lionhearted single on streaming services) so I've removed the section. Skyshiftertalk 09:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• ✓ Pass now, well done on cleaning this up! --K. Peake 11:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]